Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amit Dar
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:52, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Amit Dar[edit]
- Amit Dar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This subject fails WP:GNG for lack of substantial coverage by multiple reliable sources. No accomplishments apparently approach WP:ANYBIO. Note, his colleague Venita Kaul has a similarly pointless bio here; the theme by the creator seems to be non-notable World Bank employees. JFHJr (㊟) 16:22, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy DeletePage made for the self promotion and publicity. It should be deleted immediately.Jussychoulex (talk) 19:01, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. GS h-index of 13 not really enough for WP:Prof#C1. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:44, 20 February 2013 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:BIO, per nom, and WP:PROF, per Xxan. RayTalk 04:27, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.