Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Waimora

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Sourcing is insufficient Star Mississippi 02:36, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Waimora

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 (talk) 23:03, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 23:03, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 23:03, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 23:03, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This isn't notable, still don't have WP:SIGCOV. CastJared (talk) 10:41, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:37, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:38, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. 〜 Festucalex • talk 21:16, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom -- Devoke water 19:22, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - refs added. It would be helpful if people did WP:BEFORE before jumping to nominate.--IdiotSavant (talk) 04:11, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, passes GNG with refs added.--Ortizesp (talk) 04:34, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting after article additions (for review)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:15, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The "Change Maker" Sol Star piece is mostly a low-quality interview, with ~8 sentences by the interviewer that are arguably independent. It's better than the other sources, but still hardly substantial. Every single other source is either trivial or non-independent. That is nowhere close to meeting GNG. JoelleJay (talk) 17:41, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - @GiantSnowman:, Per above. Clearly significant figure in Solomon football. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 01:51, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As Joelle says, one decent source is not enough. Giant Snowman 07:32, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.