Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akshay Chandrashekhar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:17, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Akshay Chandrashekhar[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROMO. One small role in a film, only sources found are Imdb. Award doesn't appear notable. Oaktree b (talk) 15:58, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Oaktree b (talk) 15:58, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Karnataka-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:23, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

He played a major role in a movie which was nominated for National Awards, he heads a production company.

I think these two points are enough for him to be on wiki 2406:7400:73:83A1:E8C4:D8AC:6E04:D941 (talk) 16:33, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment : "He won the National Award" - The award is won by the producer and National Award is the most important award in India. But I doubt if it satisfies the notability as only single factor notability can be verified. Couldn't find anything else for two factor notability Christopheronthemove (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 13:49, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles (talk) 17:49, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 15:03, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails GNG and ACTOR. The subject did not win a national award, it was a special mention for a non feature film not the subject. :BEFORE showed nothing that meets SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. BLPs need clearly high quality (per WP:BLP) IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per V, BLP and BIO. // Timothy :: talk 06:22, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 09:19, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Timothy. Might become notable in the future, but isn't now. --bonadea contributions talk 08:16, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.