Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aivita Muze

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:35, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aivita Muze[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I tried draftifying the article only to find out that it was too old. My rationale was that the subject isn't fully notable enough per sources. The sources in the article are only her agency and the (which only verifies work but does not establish notability) and a press release from the brand Hugo Boss. The Vogue source is the image from her walking the runway for a notable fashion house but like I said before that only verifies work rather than showing notability as if she had been chosen for one of their 'Top X models of the season" articles or if they did an article about herself. I tried looking for sources in Latvian to no avail which brings me here. Trillfendi (talk) 18:59, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Women, and Latvia. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:44, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Sources have not got significant coverage (WP:SIGCOV). Not notable enough. Shadow345110 (talk) 00:34, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Lacks in-depth coverage in independent sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle 03:29, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.