Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Achol Jok Mach

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 06:48, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Achol Jok Mach

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of an activist, entrepreneur and podcaster, not properly referenced as passing notability criteria for activists, entrepreneurs or podcasters. As always, people regardless of occupation are not "inherently" notable just because they exist, and have to pass WP:GNG on third party coverage and analysis about their work to externally validate its significance -- but five of the six footnotes here are primary source content self-published by organizations she was directly affiliated with, which are not support for notability at all, and the only independent third-party source is a glancing namecheck of her existence on one page of a book about her country's fight for independence, which isn't substantive enough to single-handedly vault her over GNG all by itself.
Obviously no prejudice against recreation in the future if and when she actually has enough of the correct type of sourcing, but nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to pass GNG. Bearcat (talk) 13:32, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, Radio, and Africa. Bearcat (talk) 13:32, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @Bearcat: - I think you're right about this one. Lajmmoore (talk) 10:29, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:29, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. The sources invoked are extremely lame: A self-written cv; a fellowship announcement where our subject is not mentioned at all; one single mention in a book about "Africa's longest war"; then a few more routine listings. Her work seems admirable but Wikipedia is a not a political promotion vehicle either way. -The Gnome (talk) 20:33, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete All sources either are passing mentions or not independent. Questions? four OLIfanofmrtennant (she/her) 16:29, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete RS does not exist at this time. Lightburst (talk) 18:29, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per The Gnome and a lack of notable coverage. Giraffer ^{(talk·contribs)} 20:26, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.