Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AccuSystems
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:03, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
AccuSystems[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- AccuSystems (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article doesn't show any reason for notability and reads as an advertisement. Nigel757 (talk) 17:31, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, Software, and Colorado. Skynxnex (talk) 17:56, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Borderline A7, does not really make any recognisable CCS. Also WP:BROCHURE as of current version, but the pre-UPE edited versions available in the article history are better in that regard. I cannot find anything beyond name checks, not even passing mentions really. Alpha3031 (t • c) 07:40, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Desertarun (talk) 18:59, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Once I removed the spammy promo links, the article was even shorter. Nothing to suggest this company met GNG/WP:NCORP criteria for establishing notability. HighKing++ 17:19, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.