Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abraham Sie

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 06:31, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abraham Sie[edit]

Abraham Sie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBASKETBALL. Geschichte (talk) 09:46, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Coverage of sports below the top level of the sport in question, will usually be trivial and therefore fail WP:SIGCOV. Geschichte (talk) 18:01, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • No, that is just incorrect. There are countless of athletes, basketball players or others, who receive plenty of significant coverage despite failing WP:NBASKETBALL or WP:NFOOTBALL or any of the other sports-specific notability guidelines. WP:NSPORT, which WP:NBASKETBALL is a section of, clearly states in its own FAQ that failing one of the SNG's is not grounds for deletion as all subject, reglardless of whether they pass a SNG, have to pass the general notability guideline. Maybe Abraham Sie doesn't pass WP:GNG and if you would have nominated him for failing WP:GNG after being unable to find sources I might have voted delete. But not bothering to conduct a WP:BEFORE on a subject from a non-english speaking country (to prevent a WP:BIAS) who has played for his national teams and professionally in two top-tier national leagues is not good practice. Alvaldi (talk) 18:27, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I'm finding some sources, for example [1] [2] [3] [4] so I feel he meets GNG. Playing for a national team is certainly a plus. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 00:42, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 02:14, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 17:52, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.