Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhijita Kulshrestha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. This article is also eligible for G5 speedy deletion (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wikibaji). MER-C 16:54, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Abhijita Kulshrestha[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An Indian astrologer and gem expert. Doesn't fit WP:NBIO. Some publications like this The Hindy article exist, but they look like press-releases. Bbarmadillo (talk) 21:06, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The article has enough news resources which are not press releases. Please check all the news references carefully:

https://www.thehindu.com/features/metroplus/a-gem-of-a-woman/article5538461.ece

https://www.deccanherald.com/content/465360/gem-woman.html

http://www.businessworld.in/article/Importance-Of-Gemstones/25-06-2017-120531/

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chandigarh/Winds-of-change-against-employment-exchange/articleshow/762375491.cms

https://www.huffingtonpost.in/author/abhijita-kulshrestha/

https://www.deccanchronicle.com/lifestyle/viral-and-trending/190516/stones-power-healing-gemstones.html

https://thriveglobal.in/stories/chasing-the-musk-deer-called-happiness/

https://omtimes.com/tag/abhijita-kulshrestha/

https://www.gemstone.org/education/more-resources/30-education/fun-articles/197-importance-of-gemstones

http://www.millenniumpost.in/book-reviews/a-taste-of-poetic-freshness-17928

https://www.dailypioneer.com/2019/sunday-edition/for-a-taste-of-freshness.html

https://www.gemstoneuniverse.com/abhijita-wins-woman-indias-woman-icon-of-the-year-award.php — Preceding unsigned comment added by Endureforce (talk • contribs) 06:25, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bbarmadillo (talk) 21:06, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Bbarmadillo (talk) 21:06, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:25, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. A WP:INTERVIEW and some mentions in passing, leaning delete. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:00, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment:Hi User:Piotrus, Thanks for your comment. If you think the article have some passing mentions then why not vote for Keep?Endureforce (talk) 06:18, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Because GNG requires in-depth coverage. Passing mentions are not sufficient. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:20, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no sourcing that comes to the level of passing the GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:36, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have mentioned resources in my above comment. You must check all the resources which are on good news websites.Endureforce (talk) 06:29, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, xinbenlv ^{Talk, Remember to "ping" me} 05:44, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:NBIO. KartikeyaS (talk) 20:06, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep added many reliable and independent resources which are enough to passes general notability criteria. resources mentioned in my above comment. Endureforce (talk) 11:09, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Endureforce, who created this article, is a Wikibaji sockpuppet. MER-C 16:54, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The main 2 sources are a couple of interviews, very much in the press release style, and the other "sources" are mostly her own work. Black Kite (talk) 21:26, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:34, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, the sources mentioned above are interviews, press releases, passing mentions and her own work, none of which contribute to notability. Therefore, this person does not meet GNG. I would advise Endureforce to follow WP:THREE when citing sources in any future discussions. Devonian Wombat (talk) 11:47, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.