Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdool Hamid Ramjeet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:40, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Abdool Hamid Ramjeet[edit]

Not notable vanity. Esprit15d 16:44, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. This might be worth looking into. Whilst there is not much evidence in the way of google hits [1], a few of the hits may be worth looking into by a french speaker (I think they are french anyway). Movementarian 17:20, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable. Ifnord 18:07, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per Ecclesiastes 1:2. I couldn't find anything in some specialized Africanist databases, under various spelling variants of this name. — mark ✎ 23:37, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletions. -- Humansdorpie 23:11, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep Mauritius National Library catalogue currently offline, so unable to assess truth of claims of published works. However, Movementarian's Google search brings up two Mauritian newspaper reviews of a book (English title Builders of History) which features Mr Ramjeet in his capacity as a Mauritian promoter of the Urdu language - inferring some notability. Humansdorpie 23:44, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Mauritius National Library Catalogue now back online, nothing listed by this individual. Humansdorpie 12:55, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable vanity biography. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-03 00:14Z
Abstain: I feel that the current contents do not establish notability - abstaining simply because I am not sure of the notability of this guy. --Bhadani 08:16, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete notability does not appear to have been established. Stifle 02:04, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.