Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdelhay Elanbassi
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 15:53, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Abdelhay Elanbassi[edit]
- Abdelhay Elanbassi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
spam from Voidz. non notable producer, lacks multiple significant roles in notable productions, lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. mix of pr and non reliable sources. I found nothing better. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:26, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:43, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:43, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:43, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:43, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No sources to establish notability. The given sources are unreliable and mention the subject's business more than the subject: one by a business that represents the subject's company, one self-published entry in a business listing web site and one by the subject's company web site. This is a vanity article posted by an editor for hire. Jojalozzo 19:30, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- delete clearly fails WP:CREATIVE. LibStar (talk) 08:50, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.