Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aashari Crosswell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn. Eagles 24/7 (C) 23:37, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aashari Crosswell[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing much significant coverage towards WP:GNG. Only played two seasons in college, has not played in NFL. He is currently on a USFL practice squad, but there is no assumption of notability even if he plays in a game there this season. Eagles 24/7 (C) 16:07, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, American football, Arizona, and California. Eagles 24/7 (C) 16:07, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Finding some SIGCOV. E.g., [1], [2]. He showed promise with four INTs as a freshman, but then fizzled out. See here. The coverage is just not enough to persuade me to "Keep" given the lack of significant on-field accomplishments. Cbl62 (talk) 19:09, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I still think this is dubious from a GNG perspective, especially given the lack of on-field accomplisments, but I'm striking my vote in view of the nominator's expressed desire to withdraw. Cbl62 (talk) 16:38, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails WP:GNG. Not enough there to be worth a page for it. Keep, per updates since change. Hey man im josh (talk) 22:31, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:GNG with significant coverage such as [3][4][5][6][7] Alvaldi (talk) 12:31, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"House of Sparky" appears to be an SBNation blog, written by fans, and the SI.com article is a blurb that every player on the Seahawks' 90-man roster received at the time. I would discount both of them. The other three sources appear to be decent, although the first two are from the same newspaper. Eagles 24/7 (C) 16:11, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Eagles247 There is also this article from The Athletic. Alvaldi (talk) 16:21, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's a good one as well. The subject likely passes GNG with these four articles. I'd withdraw this nomination if not for the two "delete" !votes above. Eagles 24/7 (C) 16:26, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I also added a source from the Seattle Times that has a fairly decent coverage on him. @Cbl62 and @Hey man im josh, are the above mentioned sources enough to change your minds? Alvaldi (talk) 16:32, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alright I switched it to a keep. Hey man im josh (talk) 23:23, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, passes GNG per Alvaldi. BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:19, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.