Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ABAS Software

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. v/r - T P 02:48, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ABAS Software[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Specialised piece of software written up by someone with an admitted (by e-mail) COI. Is there sufficient evidence of notability? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:18, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:47, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Yet another back office software business advertising on Wikipedia: an Enterprise resource planning & e-business application designed for manufacturers in the Assemble-to-Order, Make-to-Order and Engineer-to-Order environment. Please review the rules for capitalization in English. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:47, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment (from User talk:Sawa123#Deletion of abas Software)

"Dear RHworth, your talking about an email of an CIO (whatever that is?!?). The email was not written by myself, I asked for help because I don't understand everything that is complained about." "

"Can you really assure me that you have no COI?"

"Yes I can assure that."

"No COI??"

"I used to work for a competitor... I guess that is my interest."

Yappy2bhere (talk) 14:51, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No non-primary sources used in the article, Google News returs only press releases and trivial mentions. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 00:01, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There is various non-primary sources: "abas Business Software Overview". from Technology Evaluation Center [1], "ABAS Software ERP Review" from ERP Software Comparison. [2], "Abas ERP" from ERP.com. and "Technical Specifications" from Liferay Inc. [3]. Or why would those be primary sources? And if you check different websites for erp selection or erp evalutation you can find lots of information regarding the software. Only searching in Google will only show sites from the company, the same will happen if your looking for other companies or products. Sawa123 (talk) 08:53, 13 September 2011 (UTC)sawa123[reply]
Keep Major product. I would not be in favor of having articles for individual components. I don't see that using inappropriate capitals is a cause for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 19:04, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.