Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/888casino

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to 888 Holdings. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 03:24, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

888casino

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

essentially promotional, the work of a paid editor DGG ( talk ) 19:53, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Notable, I'd say, although the article should really include details of the company's recent £7.8 million fine for failing to protect people with gambling problems ([1]). --Michig (talk) 20:19, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:26, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into 888.com: If the promotional stuff were trimmed, there would not be enough content to justify a separate article. ViperSnake151 Talk 19:14, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to 888 Holdings per ViperSnake151. Not worth a standalone article. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:37, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per above. Press releases or rewrites of them, no good sources for stand alone article. WP:CORPSPAM. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:50, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to 888 Holdings; not independently notable. No need for a merge, as the target article would not be improved by this content. Ping @ViperSnake151, Clarityfiend, and Piotrus: to see if they would consider a redirect. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:30, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Why you think there is noting to merge? Not even one sentence? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:43, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It would be cleaner outcome. If there's a desire to merge anything, it can be picked up from the article history. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:33, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge as per previous editors Chetsford (talk) 19:04, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge agree with everyone else. I would close this, but I can't remember the "Please merge this article" template. L3X1 (distænt write) 02:37, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.