Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/20th Century Masters – The Millennium Collection: The Best of Wild Orchid
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Shimeru (talk) 01:02, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
20th Century Masters – The Millennium Collection: The Best of Wild Orchid[edit]
- 20th Century Masters – The Millennium Collection: The Best of Wild Orchid (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
possibly a hoax, no reliable Google hits (most are copies of this articles), another fact is why would UMG release a compilation from an artist on Sony BMG Caldorwards4 (talk) 01:22, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 01:49, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I don't think it's a hoax because the cover looks legitimate (if it's not a clever forgery) and some blog-style websites claim that it exists. For example, see this. But something has really gone wrong with this album if it is has completely escaped notice by the mainstream media, and not even Amazon or CDUniverse have it for sale (you can check for yourself). Since the artist is notable otherwise, this compilation is probably just a record company quickie, released with no promotion and of no interest to fans or anyone else. DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 02:03, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: No reliable sources exist. Joe Chill (talk) 02:12, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. At worst a hoax, and at best an insignificant rerelease of Talk to Me: Hits, Rarities & Gems. EALacey (talk) 10:47, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.