Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2027 FIFA Women's World Cup

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep Initially had little sourced content but now has reliably sourced statements of intent to bid from senior figures of a number of countries. Little realistic probability of this fundamentally notable tournament not occurring, there is only going to be more to write about this tournament in the future. Fenix down (talk) 18:27, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2027 FIFA Women's World Cup

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Even a single-edit IP with a lying edit summary can remove a ProD, so here we are...

WP:CRYSTAL, WP:TOOSOON. We don't know where, when, how many countries, ... It will of course be a notable event, just like the 2031, 2035, ... version, but please wait with a new article until at least a few things are certain. Consider that the bidding process for the 2023 event only started this year' [1] Fram (talk) 14:27, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Except that we do not know if the Cup will even exist in 2027. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 15:11, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Snowycats (talk) 15:37, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:TOOSOON....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:55, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:56, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:V and WP:CRYSTAL. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 16:27, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:TOOSOON, not enough information for an article yet. S.A. Julio (talk) 17:13, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. S.A. Julio (talk) 17:17, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:17, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:17, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Changing to Keep. I still think it's clearly too soon, but honestly if we've got the men's 2034 article live since 2017, I'll be damned if I'll !vote to pull the women's. --valereee (talk) 15:53, 15 June 2019 (UTC) ~~Delete clearly too soon.~~ --valereee (talk) 20:08, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete definitely WP:TOOSOON.--Vulp here 05:13, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Currently in a similar stage to the 2034 FIFA World Cup in that there are some rumblings of countries interested in bidding to host, but no formal bidding process yet. That article was kept at AFD last year, and going against that precedent feels like it would be a case of systemic gender bias. There are reliable sources discussing the 2027 event, such as here, here, and (to a lesser extent) here. Lowercaserho (talk) 06:32, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but needs work on The page at the moment is very draftily at the moment and definitely needs a lot of work on to make it look like an wiki article. HawkAussie (talk) 07:54, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - TOOSOON. Giant Snowman 12:35, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -several news articles related to the bidding process in numerous countries. Article could use expansion, improved referencing not deletion per WP:ATD. Hmlarson (talk) 17:49, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral, defaulting to a weak keep. I'm not sure what to vote here - there's a smattering of coverage with regards to the potential Nordic bid and the potential Dutch bid and a potential U.S. bid. That being said I'm actually sympathetic to the WP:OSE argument being made above - there's a bit more coverage of the Men's 2034 than the Women's 2027, but the type of coverage is the same, and is borderline WP:GNG. I think WP:GNG is actually satisfied based on the way I voted for the 2034 Men's World Cup, albeit marginally. SportingFlyer T·C 23:35, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Changing to Keep - Article should be kept as we already have the 2034 Men's tournament page. Kevinhanit (talk) 17:24, 15 June 2019 (UTC) Delete - Can be recreated once we have an actual bidding process announced by FIFA. Kevinhanit (talk) 17:11, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but needs work per above. (And we kept the 2034 MEN's World Cup article a literal year ago, and there's coverage for this one.) It seems we've established a precedent of the next two editions having articles. Paintspot Infez (talk) 00:37, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. GNG met on the same terms as similarly-situated articles as well as the gender issues raised herein. Montanabw^(talk) 19:48, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as there are documented bids and per the precedent set by the men's World Cup (allowing two future editions to have articles). Sounder Bruce 21:19, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with sources added since the AFD nomination. I was surprised by all the initial Delete votes above, but digging deeper the article has been significantly improved compared to the initial unreferenced article, Nfitz (talk) 15:41, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.