Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 All-Japan Artistic Gymnastics Championships Qualification

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The keep votes are not convincing while those requesting delete are providing clear policy based reasons. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 18:55, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 All-Japan Artistic Gymnastics Championships Qualification[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and the event fails WP:NSPORTS. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:09, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Japan. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:09, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Definitely not for deletion. But more citations should be added. The article is qualified for notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.190.111.42 (talk) 07:54, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NLIST, the article itself is just links to loads of random, mostly non-notable events. We don't have qualifying articles for the national championships of sports in any other country, because they don't pass WP:GNG generally, and this is no exception. Also, seems like WP:FANCRUFT to me, as the topic is too niche. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:00, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article is not a stand-alone list, so it doesn't need to meet WP:NLIST standards. For WP:GNG, it meets Significant coverage with both the article & the sources describe the qualification criterion directly and in detail; Reliable sources as the information is taken from Japan Gymnastics Association, the one that organized the events, & Seiko Sportslink, a popular sport website in Japan; secondary source & independent of the subject as Seiko Sportslink belongs to Seiko Corporation & isn't affiliated with gymnastics organizations in Japan. NguyenDuyAnh1995 (talk) 09:32, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All the sources listed are results tables- they show the event happened, but are not significant coverage about the event. Significant coverage would be prose in e.g. newspapers/websites about the qualification event. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:44, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material, as stated at WP:GNG with no mention of "prose". The source cited the criterion, as it is in criterion topic, & the detailed results, another topic, of each event are in another link. All are directly & in detailed to the topics each of them is related to. NguyenDuyAnh1995 (talk) 10:13, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  
  I can add the events that were served as the qualifications in references. But the website is in maintenance & will be available in a week or two. NguyenDuyAnh1995 (talk) 10:22, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  - And lists of events/results is not significant coverage, and so none of the current sources in the article are significant coverage. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:56, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG. No notable events within the article. Also, are some of the accounts in this discussion linked because the IP account looks suspicious with this being it’s only edit. Fats40boy11 (talk) 08:01, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
To be clear, I’m not implying anything malicious by that. It just looks very suspicious, that’s all. Fats40boy11 (talk) 08:07, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails GNG and WP is not a mirror of source material. Results listings are not significant coverage; and the JGA are not an independent source. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 10:58, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.