Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 Formula One World Championship

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion at this time. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:48, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2020 Formula One World Championship[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOSOON. No news specifically related to 2020 has been released yet. T v x1 13:26, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Yes, there has been specific news about 2020, e.g. Formula 1 delays Miami Grand Prix until 2020. The organisers are openly making plans for later years too, e.g. Liberty unveils its post-2020 vision for F1. Andrew D. (talk) 16:10, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

None of which constitutes content currently included or that can be included in the contested article. The Miami Grand Prix is a proposed race. 2020 is the earliest possible year it could be held. There is no contract for it (yet), so it simply cannot be included in the article. And what happens beyond 2020 is logically of none relevance to a 2020 season article. Thus nothing of which of you mentioned justifies keeping this article. Moreover there was some prior discussion at WT:F1 which also had the sentiment that it should not be created yet. T v x1 18:05, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per WP:NOTNEWS. We currently have nothing encyclopedic value in the article right now. Corvus tristis (talk) 19:44, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per WP:TOOSOON and WP:CRYSTAL. Cannot base an article on what 'might' happen. Eagleash (talk) 20:56, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:15, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the reasons above. There is not enough news for now. – Sabbatino (talk) 09:48, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the reasons above. It is too soon and there is not enough news wh have known about for now. - User:GCunknown (talk) 01:25, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. In hindsight, I should have requested speedy deletion since this was deleted through AFD before.T v x1 01:28, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would object to speedy deletion since an argument could be made the circumstances have changed now that we are a year closer to this future event. As for whether I'd agree with that argument, I'd need to do more research, so I'm undecided for now. But speedies should be uncontroversial, and I don't feel this is. Smartyllama (talk) 12:50, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Move to draftspace We'll want an article on it in the next 3 months or so, if\when some actually details emerge. But too soon for now. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:16, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.