Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012–13 Scottish Junior Football Central Division Two

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:03, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2012–13 Scottish Junior Football Central Division Two[edit]

2012–13 Scottish Junior Football Central Division Two (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable - effectively the 8th tier of Scottish football, which we don't do season articles for. Incomplete - last updated 8 years ago, source no longer works so couldn't be completed even if it was kept. Boothy m (talk) 13:36, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:37, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:37, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:37, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - non-notable minor league season. GiantSnowman 18:49, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete not a notable league season Seasider91 (talk) 19:34, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete It was a 4th tier league (the Juniors are a completely separate system) and incompleteness isn't a reason for deletion. However I struggled to find significant coverage of the season so it's a delete. Dougal18 (talk) 14:12, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I realise they are a separate system, that's why I used the word "effectively" Boothy m (talk) 17:26, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.