Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 French Open
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete and recreate when more information becomes available. Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 04:14, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- 2009 French Open (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
WP:CRYSTAL Euroleague (talk) 02:12, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, WP:CRYSTAL. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 05:30, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - We will soon know who will be defending the title. This article will just have to be recreated at a later date. Might as well keep Francium12 (talk) 11:41, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:CRYSTAL Yeah, it will have to be created later, but so will the entry for the 2040 Olympic Games. Not enough firm details available for an article yet. Townlake (talk) 15:38, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Looking too empty, like a blank sheet. Gr8lyknow (talk) 20:04, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Yep, pretty empty and WP:CRYSTAL. Undoubtedly will be recreated but hopefully after this year's Open. Pigman☿ 21:42, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:CRYSTAL ball. Badly written with little context or sources. — Wenli (reply here) 22:08, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:46, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:46, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Even though the French Open won't happen for another year, as time progresses this year, more information will be availible, adding to the stub that's there now. However, the external link directs to the 2008 Open, not the 2009 one. In fact, theres no info about the 2009 on the front page, but as time progresses, more info might pop up. DA PIE EATER (talk) 00:18, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.