Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009–2010 Puebla F.C. season

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 14:15, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2009–2010 Puebla F.C. season[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fork of 2013–14 Puebla F.C. season? the title says 2009-2010, but the text is a mixture of different seasons. Frietjes (talk) 17:17, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:23, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:23, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:24, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:24, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Appears to have a been a copy-and-paste from the 2013–14 season. Unless someone wants to effectively blank the page, change the title to the correct format, and add information from the correct season, then it's better to just delete it. 21.colinthompson (talk) 01:50, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the topic is probably notable, but it wasn't properly created - I'd say draftify as deletion is not cleanup, but I'm not sure if anyone would work on the article. SportingFlyer talk 06:06, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- it looks like there are some differences, but probably better to start over at 2009–10 Puebla F.C. season, rather than try to sort out what is actually correct for the 2009–10 season. Frietjes (talk) 16:21, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - topic is notable but it is worthless in current state. Also agree the correct location would b e '2009–10'. Giant Snowman 08:15, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.