Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2006 Serena Williams tennis season
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. The IP's !vote does not appear to be grounded in policy/consensus. King Jakob C2 00:51, 17 April 2013 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]
2006 Serena Williams tennis season[edit]
- 2006 Serena Williams tennis season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
She played a whole 4 tournaments! This is excessive and overkill. All should be summerised in the main page; or if someone really wants to create individual years then combine years together as Williams had a very low tournament count for quiet a few years. Socialhistorian2013 (talk) 08:55, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete-Who Cares? I support a creation of a article that lists her tennis seasons.72.198.210.219 (talk) 15:06, 9 April 2013 (UTC)Radioactiveplayful[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:25, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Reluctant Keep - as much as I believe this pages are against Wiki guidelines, consensus has generally been that the Tennis WikiProject want these to exist for the major players. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 21:28, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Whether I agree or disagree with these yearly pages, consensus was to allow yearly pages for each and every year, forward or backward, as long as the player in question won at least one of the four Majors. Roger Federer has them for every year plus: Roger Federer's early career, Roger Federer junior years, and who knows what else. As long as there is enough info and it's summarized properly they can stay. This particular article is well done and formatted nicely. The flag icons are correct and the scoring in prose is thankfully omitted. At least it's not a mess of prose detail-bloat like 2012 Serena Williams tennis season. Yes this one is sparse because Serena played little, but no real harm with it. Fyunck(click) (talk) 06:53, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.