Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2001 Tim Henman tennis season
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Tim Henman#2001–2004. J04n(talk page) 11:44, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
2001 Tim Henman tennis season[edit]
- 2001 Tim Henman tennis season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I understand that WikiProject Tennis allow yearly articles for players who have won a major. Tim has never won a major so i have no idea why we need an article about his year with his closest SF result at Wimby. He had a better year when he made the SF of the French and USO but neither is that year worthy of an article. GAtechnical (talk) 10:20, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:41, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge the highlights into Tim Henman#2001–2004, which can appropriately contain this content. Gong show 02:52, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/Delete - I would agree that he does not qualify for a stand-alone yearly page. Not only has he never won a Major, he was never in a Major final. Fyunck(click) (talk) 10:34, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge. Per the above.--Epeefleche (talk) 01:24, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.