Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/100 Ways to Write a Book

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Daniel (talk) 02:55, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

100 Ways to Write a Book[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable book, no critical reviews of the work found, no sources of any kind really. Delete for not meeting GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 03:01, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Oaktree b (talk) 03:01, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
~~Speedy~~ Delete ~~U5. I've added tag.~~ Cursory search doesn't show any RS. This or related articles have been declined by AFC twice at least, and there also seems to be a COI. —siro χ o 04:17, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The citations are only about the contributing authors, not the book itself. Doesn't satisfy WP:NBOOK. --TheLonelyPather (talk) 06:07, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Doesn't meet WP:NBOOK. I haven't checked all of the references, but a random click-through seems to show that most sources don't even mention this book. Quality>Quantity. ARandomName123 (talk) 02:44, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.