Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Đoàn Thị Hương

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Kim Jong-nam. (non-admin closure) — Yash^talk stalk 19:02, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Đoàn Thị Hương[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is about a person accused of taking part in a crime, but not so far found guilty. An article about the crime itself would make sense, but not one about this person as an individual, as the sources discuss her only in relation to the crime. She is not notable for other reasons. WP:BLP1E. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 05:47, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. NgYShung ^huh? 10:57, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. NgYShung ^huh? 10:57, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. NgYShung ^huh? 10:57, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

~~*Support~~ I thin the nominator explained it really well, I also think that the article fails WP:CBALL. Could possibly be merged into an article of the actual event if it is ever started but there is not much to merge at this point. Inter&anthro (talk) 14:59, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect I guess I was hinting at it in my initial vote but per the two votes bellow I've decided to change my input to a redirect. Inter&anthro (talk) 00:01, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect back to Kim Jong-nam I created the article as a redirect - it was never intended to be an article on its own. --— Chevvin 20:21, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect I initially looked for Doan Thi Huong and finding it missing, I noticed the Vietnamese version vi:Đoàn Thị Hương appeared to have had significant work / curation (assuming they follow WP:BLP) and is the top Google hit - we should try to keep the information in both languages in sync. (Reminder - both accented and ASCII Đoàn Thị Hương should do the same thing.) Should we tag the Kim Jong-nam page somehow to request bilingual volunteers on both sides? —Hobart (talk) 21:27, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect It's a plausible search term--why would we delete it? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:40, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm happy to accept a redirect if other users believe outright deletion is not appropriate. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 21:39, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect However I think it would be in our best interests to preserve the text of both this and Siti Aisyah as a subsection in the assassination page, rather than just simply blanking both pages and only leaving redirects. BedrockPerson (talk) 17:36, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.