Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Újpest (disambiguation)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:58, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Újpest (disambiguation)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disambiguation not required per WP:2DABS. A hatnote at the primary topic Újpest points to the football team, and that article lists the sports teams "Újpesti ...". PROD declined; subsequent discussion at Talk:Újpest (disambiguation)#PROD. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:19, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I endorsed the original WP:PROD, but have changed my mind. There are four full title matches (if you include the football club, which I do) on the corresponding Hungarian DAB page - and the Hungarian article hu:Újpest (történelmi település) (eight screensful) has no English equivalent. An InterWiki link from the English DAB page is the easiest way to find it. Narky Blert (talk) 14:51, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I put a list of possible matches on the talk page, though I am unclear which can be legitimately added; but any one of them would lift this from the TwoDabs category. Swanny18 (talk) 11:35, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. All the sections of Ujpest TE would be valid DAB entrie, there's interwiki potential, and the see also sections to the metro stations would have qualified it as a 2DABs with additional value anyway. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 18:15, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. "2DABS" does not require deletion, it says that when there are two items of same name that a disambiguation page is not necessarily required. However, if/when as here some editor finds some reason to create a disambiguation page anyhow, e.g. to include some reasonable "See also" for a partial match or for any other reason, it should be kept. --do ncr am 23:09, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:57, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:58, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.