Wikipedia:Abuse response/Nominate/Archive 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pilif12p

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


 Done Pilif12p (talk · contribs · count) Pilif12p 22:01, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Questions

  1. What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Please address any blocks/AIV threads you may have here.
    I mainly do anti-vandalism, but if I see errors that I know are false, I usually fix them.
  2. What experience do you have in dealing with vandalism on Wikipedia?
    While I've only been here for a few months, I've been doing lots of anti-vandalism work. These make up (probably) 95% of my contributions.
  3. Why do you want to join the abuse response project?
    I'd like to help stop repeat-vandals, and help keep WP a better place for real contributors.

Comments

  • I know him from other projects and support him being able to participate. Enti342 (talk) 22:21, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
{{Working}} Looking into, will have a responce in about 24 hours. -- /MWOAP|Notify Me\ 01:51, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
  •  Done Seen around on en-help and other IRC places, contribs and other data check out, good user. Welcome to the Team. -- /MWOAP|Notify Me\ 22:36, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
  • Sorry for this late response, I've been busy with other things. I've reviewed your contributions and I agree with MWOAP and Enti342. Netalarmpoke 02:45, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Phearson

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


 Done Phearson (talk · contribs · count) (talk) 14:41, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
Questions

  1. What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Please address any blocks/AIV threads you may have here.
    My main contributions have been fact finding and vandal reverting. I have had no blocks and my account is in good standing
  2. What experience do you have in dealing with vandalism on Wikipedia?
    Somewhat extensive, I have reverted blantent vandalism, and I am currently involved in a more complex situation with another user via RfC.
  3. Why do you want to join the abuse response project?
    I am a part time Unix administrator and I have a good grasp of understanding IP abuse and protocol (being that I take care of abuse situations at work), I would like to bring my experience and expertise to the response team.

Comments

  • I've reviewed your contributions and I don't see any problem. You current handling of the RfC case is professional and shows that you are capable of such situations. Support Netalarmpoke 04:24, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
  • Support Reviewed and seems like overall good editor. -- /MWOAP|Notify Me\ 01:44, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Sure.   «l| Promethean ™|l»  (talk) 11:30, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Looks good Enti342 (talk) 02:40, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Mlpearc

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Mlpearc (talk · contribs · count) Mlpearc pull my chain 'Tribs 23:00, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Questions

  1. What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Please address any blocks/AIV threads you may have here.
    My main area of activity is Account Creations and en-accounts IRC. While working ACC I've become familiar with IP ranges and blocks, by no means am I saying I know all about them, but I think I have a basic foundation. I have never been blocked, I've reported users and IP addresses to AIV numerous times. I also do regular article edits ie. fixing links, spelling and so on. I honestly feel my edits, contributions and demeanor are in good standing.
  2. What experience do you have in dealing with vandalism on Wikipedia?
    The vandalism I've dealt with very often involves "Rollback", "Huggle" and "Twinkle", I have been highly active with those areas and tools. I also have rollback rights on Simple Wiki, but nowhere near the same edit counts.
  3. Why do you want to join the abuse response project?
    I would like to help out with "repeat vandals", and continue curbing and reverting vandalism.

Comments

This user appears to be okay. Phearson (talk) 15:32, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

How familiar are you with wikimarkup? Netalarmtalk 03:59, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Answer: I originally knew it as "Wikify", I don't know every rule of the top of my head, but I can recognize when article is in poor condition due to "wikimarkup". This is one of the tags I work with using "Kissle" and in my short but continuing help at AfC. Mlpearc pull my chain 'Tribs 04:23, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

  • To add to the genric answer above, what I think you are looking for, can I work wikimarkup, building report pages, wikitables, links, etc. Yes, please look at my User and Talk pages, also any of the Diff's Here and you can see my work with wikimarkup.

Mlpearc pull my chain 'Tribs 15:15, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Awesome. I'm just asking cause the templates we use (Template:AbRep) and others are quite complicated. No problems with edits.Support. Netalarmtalk 08:40, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Support See this user on IRC all the time, always tries his best, and is a great editor. -- /DeltaQuad|Notify Me\ 10:30, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

EdoDodo

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


EdoDodo (talk · contribs · count) - EdoDodo talk 19:17, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
Questions

  1. What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Please address any blocks/AIV threads you may have here.
    Most of my contributions involve either doing maintenance tasks, fighting vandalism using Huggle/Twinkle or creating accounts for the account creation team. At the account creation team I learnt how IP ranges and blocks work, and also learnt how to understand WHOIS reports.
  2. What experience do you have in dealing with vandalism on Wikipedia?
    I have rollback rights here, and frequently deal with vandalism using Huggle and Twinkle.
  3. Why do you want to join the abuse response project?
    I would like to help out here to fight vandalism. I think that I would be helpful for abuse response because I can write in a number of different languages (English, French, Italian and some Spanish).

Comments

I see no problem with this user's edits. EdoDodo's experience is largely with maintenance and counter-vandalism, which is what we need. Support Netalarmtalk 12:46, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Support Phearson (talk) 13:44, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

UsmanAkhter

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


UsmanAkhter (talk · contribs · count) UsAkh (talk) 04:57, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Questions

  1. What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Please address any blocks/AIV threads you may have here.
    I essentially try and prevent vandalism that I see on the various threads I view. Most of such corrections I've done before making a user-name, but I definitely feel the need to officially join and help out as much as I can.
  2. What experience do you have in dealing with vandalism on Wikipedia?
    I am relatively new in regards to official abuse response, but I consistently corrected mistakes, however small, when I see them on Wikipedia articles. Since I've benefited from the resources and content offered on Wikipedia countless times, I feel the need to give back in a professional and effective manner.
  3. Why do you want to join the abuse response project?
    As I mentioned earlier, I have greatly benefited from the abundant plethora of information that Wikipedia has to offer, and so I would definitely likely to help out. I've realized that such accurate and usually reliable information is a privilege I take for granted because there are others monitoring Wikipedia abuse, and I would like to be part of that project.

Comments

Reject, on the basis of too new a user. Phearson (talk) 13:42, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

  • Oppose - I like your enthusiasm, but you need more experaince, just an suggestion: I would work on gainingRollback Rights first and work with that, then re-apply. Thanks for your interest. Mlpearc pull my chain 'Tribs 18:53, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Moral support Your edits show us that you are genuinely interested in improving Wikipedia, which is great. You'll want to edit more and possibly explore WP:ANI, WP:AIV, WP:SPI, and WP:WQA more to gain an advanced understanding of Wikipedia's counter abuse procedures. Come back in a short while, I'm sure that if you continue on your current path, you'll be approved easily. Netalarmtalk 19:02, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

  • Oppose: At this time I can not base your current edits to make an appropriate decision. Thanks for applying though. -- /DeltaQuad|Notify Me\ 20:09, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 Not done Closed by -- /DeltaQuad|Notify Me\ 20:09, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Acather96

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Acather96 (talk · contribs · count) Acather96 (talk) 19:35, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Questions

  1. What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Please address any blocks/AIV threads you may have here.
    Well, I started back in December, and started off primairly as a vandal fighter, gaining rollback rights. I frequently use a combination of Huggle and Twinkle to revert, warn and report vandals. Recently I have started to branch out into other areas, for example SCV, AFC and am trying to revive WP:BEDS. I have a clean block log, have never been given any warnings,and have never acted un-civily.
  2. What experience do you have in dealing with vandalism on Wikipedia?
    I've been on Wikipedia nearly half a year, and have a good knowledge of polciies on vandalism, cp infrigment, blocking and other that are relevant to Abuse Response.
  3. Why do you want to join the abuse response project?
    I've filed quite a few abuse reports in the past, and would now like to give something back and start helping out, and I think Abuse Response genuinley does deter some vandals from vandalising. Therefore, I would love to be part of it

Comments

Edits analysis Just thought I'd drop this here if anyone wants to see it.
Acather96, according to this, 74.63% of your edits are done with automated tools, which means that you have around 2000 manual edits. While this is not a problem, I think more experience would be helpful. Could you run a WHOIS on 208.80.152.2 and post the registered owner on this page? Thanks. Netalarmtalk 21:24, 22 June 2010 (UTC

The IP is registered with 'Wikimedia Foundation Inc' and was registered on the 23rd of July 2007. Hope this answers your question :) Thanks,Acather96 (talk) 06:35, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

 Question:  : - Could you elaborate on this Edit and subsequent Warning, Thank you Mlpearc pull my chain 'Tribs 02:24, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

I am sorry, in retrospect this probably should have not warranted a reversion with warning. I have removed the warning and apologised to the editor. Thanks,Acather96 (talk) 07:02, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
No worries. Is there any particular article or project that you've worked on and are particularly proud of? Netalarmtalk 22:24, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

There is no article I have worked on that I would say I was particularly proud of, though I am currently trying to get Battle of Dornock up to B-Class, an article I re-wrote. However, as mentioned above, I am the current co-ordinator of WikiProject Bedfordshire and am trying to revive the project. I have created an assessment page, a welcoming page,a project barnstar and this and this template to help with project member organisation. Please also have a look around the project page, talk and subpages for more contribs to the project. Thanks,Acather96 (talk) 20:16, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

  • Support - If we need another member Mlpearc pull my chain 'Tribs 20:31, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Support We'll need more people as we further integrate long-term abuse and this project. I don't see any problems. Netalarmtalk 20:40, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Support We could use the more members. Contibs look ok. Sorry for the delay in acceptance. -- /DeltaQuad|Notify Me\ 19:42, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

 Done User accepted. -- /DeltaQuad|Notify Me\ 19:42, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Fridae'sDoom

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Fridae'sDoom (talk · contribs · count) Fridae'§Doom | Spare your time? 06:55, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Questions

  1. What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Please address any blocks/AIV threads you may have here.
    I'm currently working on getting George Washington to GA Status, I am also a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, WikiProject Politics, Articles for Creation and Deletion Discussion. I've made mistakes but I've orrected myself after and have learnt from them I have rollback and reviewer rights and have experience with UAA and AIV, although I once reported a nonexistant user by accident >.< I'm friendly and approachable I've been in a position of trust on many other websites prior to Wikipedia so I do have experience in this field.
  2. What experience do you have in dealing with vandalism on Wikipedia?
    I've been given rollback rights, I've warned and reported a few IPs and vandals as well. I understand the procedures and policies for dealing with such on Wikipedia and do adhere to them.
  3. Why do you want to join the abuse response project?
    I want to help the community, Wikipedia has a great community and we learn from each other which is one of the best ways to do so.

Comments

  • Hello and welcome! Overall you look like a great contributor. The only questions I have are, do you understand the purpose of Abuse Response and do you understand how to decipher whois reports, IP ranges, etc?   Thorncrag  08:01, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
    • Whois reports are made over toolserver am I correct? IP Ranges yes, I've done similar things on a forum. Fridae'§Doom | Spare your time? 09:17, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
    • Oh WHOIS... there are links to tools that allow such on Wikipedia when dealing with certain IP users, I've seen them on talk pages. Fridae'§Doom | Spare your time? 09:55, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Who would you contact to report abuse coming from this IP address? Bear in mind that the ISP isn't always the only responsible organization for an IP address.   Thorncrag  19:14, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Well the ISP does provide an IP Admin and Abuse Response email, but I don't think that's relevant. I don't really know outside the ISP, if I were an admin I could ban a certain IP range if I know for certain the users from that IP range are all problematic then I would type 12.130.11.* into the block control panel then any IP beginning with 12.130.11 would be affected by the block/ban but since IPs vary from area to area only the IP range banned would affect users from a certain area. Fridae'§Doom | Spare your time? 01:12, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
But who would we actually contact about abuse from this IP number? Also, which organization is responsible for abuse from this IP? Netalarmtalk 10:22, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
While signing guestbooks and socializing with other Wikipedians is okay to a limited extent, it seems that you do that a lot. I get the impression that you're just joining various Wikipedia projects to get the userboxes and just to be able to say "I'm part of ***". For example, here you late co-nominate someone when it doesn't look like you're all that familiar with their edits, so I see this just as another attempt to get attention. Your request to be a SPI clerk again fits the pattern of gaining "power". This is amusing, since you decide to remove established things with no discussion. Opening unjustified SPI cases, focusing on welcoming new users, joining every project you come across, and nominating yourself at abuse response when you have no understanding of WHOIS information, IP tracing, lookup, etc. show that you just want to gain permissions and power. In fact, this can be clearly seen right here. Your responses to the questions show a lack of understanding of what abuse response does and gives me the impression that you're here for the userboxes. This again makes it clear what I'm saying. I hope that you see my point and change what you do on Wikipedia. Note: There's no need to request editor reviews a week apart. + Most of your edits are welcome messages and talk page posts with little content development or project administration. Sorry if this sounds aggressive =/ , but you really need to understand that Wikipedia doesn't work the way you think it does (stacking up permissions). Netalarmtalk 14:06, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
I'm well aware of that, no I'm not only joining for userboxes.... that's not even a valid reason as to why I joined, I do actually use rollback and I have reviewed many articles some of which were re-reviewed many more times. I made considerable edits in George Washington, when I nominated DirectHit for DYK I was unware the hook was missing citations of which I later added. I haven't contributed much and I'm joining all these WikiProjects PURELY because I want to help out. I've overextended myself and made mistakes... often at the same time but that doesn't stop me from learning from those mistakes and doing better. I wanted a second review because Diego Grez didn't really give me a satisfactory review not that I blame him since I was unclear with my original review statements. Fridae'§Doom | Spare your time? 00:12, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

 Not done Sorry not at this time, please gain more experience and the please re-aply Mlpearc Public (talk) 22:19, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Closing, per above.   Thorncrag  01:55, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Daven200520

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Daven200520 (talk · contribs · count) Phoon (talk) 03:36, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Questions

  1. What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Please address any blocks/AIV threads you may have here.
    I have contributed to Wikipedia through various edits and have successfully started 5 articles; however, I have gravitated to fighting vandalism with thousands of edits related to fighting vandalism.
  2. What experience do you have in dealing with vandalism on Wikipedia?
    As previously mentioned I have thousands of edits pertaining to vandalism. I have even been given the Rollback user privilege. I am a member of the RC patrol and have a very intimate knowledge of the processes that surrounds vandalism response.
  3. Why do you want to join the abuse response project?
    I believe I have the knowledge necessary to perform the duties of an investigator for the abuse response project, this leads me to believe that I would fit in perfectly with the duties of an investigator and most of all I would love to help as it would be fun and fulfilling.

Question(s) from Phearson

What tool would you use to look up the ownership and other details of a domain? Phearson (talk) 03:48, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

I would use my registered copy of VisualRoute 2010. --Phoon (talk) 04:29, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Question(s) from Mlpearc

Could you give a scenario where it would be appropriate to issue a level 3 warning to a vandal for their first edit of vandalism ?

You may use " %#@*& " characters for obvious selective wording, if needed. Mlpearc powwow 06:34, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

A. A Vandal that has published blatant falsehoods and slander upon the page of a living person would be a scenario upon which I would issue an immediate level 3 warning. --Phoon (talk) 08:18, 1 August 2010 (UTC)-
Within the framework of your response, I think that you would want to issue a BLP warning, not a vandalism warning.   Thorncrag  00:25, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Question(s) from Netalarm

Looking over your contribution history, 77% of your edits are automated, so I'm having a hard time on finding projects/articles that you have worked on significantly. Could you provide a link to those? Netalarmtalk 16:26, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Most of those automated edits were related to my involvement within the Recent Changes patrol, I have created 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 5. I'm part of the Welcoming Committee,Wikiproject Tropical Cyclones, and New Pages patrol.

Who is 12.130.11.180 registered to and who would the email be sent to when we're reporting abuse? Netalarmtalk 16:26, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

12.130.11.180 is registered too TD AMERITRADEbank, I'd contact their ISP's (ATT)Abuse contact which is [email protected].
The IP is actually registered to TD Banknorth, not TD AMERITRADE. Additionally, the primary contact would not be ATT, instead I would first contact the abuse handle for TD Bank, NA. This would hold true for any IP address registered to an organization in addition to an ISP.   Thorncrag  00:25, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Question(s) from -- /DeltaQuad|Notify Me\

Are you willing to stay active in the project? (I ask because we do have inactive users)

Also, at what point would you consider an IP or IP range ready for contact? Are there any circumstances that you would override the general rule? (and there are some)

Comments

I'd like to withdraw my nomination until I become more informed of policy related to abuse reports this is do to my incorrect answers to your questions. Thank you for all your input and I look forward to reapplying in the future.--Phoon (talk) 01:49, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Anowlin

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Anowlin (talk · contribs · count) --ANowlin: talk 05:53, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Questions

  1. What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Please address any blocks/AIV threads you may have here.
    I've not made many contributions to the main space, other than fighting and reverting vandalism. I've also done some patrolling and such. Editing wise, well, I'm working on cleaning up an article or two when I find one. I also have done some work at AfC, and SPI. I'm also an active helper in the IRC.
  2. What experience do you have in dealing with vandalism on Wikipedia?
    I'm active in the Counter Vandalism Network, and have seen my share of abuse.
  3. Why do you want to join the abuse response project?
    Maybe do some good! (As for understanding of Whois, and IP... I have my associates degree in Network Engineering. I think I'm qualified for that :P)

Comments

  • Who would we send the abuse report to for the IP address 207.195.60.154? Netalarmtalk 21:25, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Per whois:
Abuse Contact 1 (RAbuse) Abuse Contact 2 (OrgAbuse)
DKO9-ARIN

Kovach, Don
+1-306-751-1205
admin [AT] sgi [DOT] sk [DOT] ca

SASKN-ARIN

Sasknet Abuse
+1-306-761-6076
abuse [AT] sgi [DOT] sk [DOT] ca

Anything else? --ANowlin: talk 21:37, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Endofskull

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Endofskull (talk · contribs · count) Endofskull (talk) 00:53, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
Questions

  1. What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Please address any blocks/AIV threads you may have here.
    I mostly revert vandalism. I'm a reviewer and rollbacker, I generally patrol pages with pending changes, and then when there's nothing there, I watch over new pages, and recent changes.
  2. What experience do you have in dealing with vandalism on Wikipedia?
    As I said, I have rollback and reviewer permissions. So I've reverted lots of vandalism, and I calmly warn the user who vandalized. (Which is where a lot of my contributions come from.)
  3. Why do you want to join the abuse response project?
    Well, that's an easy one! I'd like to continue reverting vandalism, and making Wikipedia a better place!

Comments

Regretful oppose. Hi there, and welcome to Wikipedia! Unfortunately, I must regretfully oppose at this time. You seem like you are off to a great start, and seem to be an optimistic and willing contributor so far. That being said, I am concerned that you may be taking on too much, too soon, whereas you have only been contributing for about a month. Abuse investigation is a complex and demanding activity and requires a very high degree of trust. After you gain more experience, I would certainly welcome your nomination again. Sincerely,   Thorncrag  01:05, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

I believe that I could be trusted very well with this permission. I get on Wikipedia pretty often, so I don't really mind about the demanding part (if that's what you meant). Is there any other concerns you have? Endofskull (talk) 01:08, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
Abuse Response is not a permission. We check an IP, email or call the users ISP, and done. No special permissions granted or required. ANowlin talk 01:13, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Agree with Thorncraig. Try again in a few months. Sorry. Pilif12p :  Yo  01:10, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Again, what's your concerns other than that I'm new? Endofskull (talk) 01:12, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Regretful oppose. I agree with Thorncrag. I would like to point out that Abuse Response does not revert vandalism. Abuse Response is the last resort for dealing with users who have vandalized and abused Wikipedia for along time. This position requires a great deal of trust, as we deal on a regular basis with sensitive information, and we also make contact with the users ISP. I'm sorry, but in my opinion, you just aren't quite in a position to join this project yet. ANowlin talk 01:12, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I see what you guys are saying. And I understand that this is with abusive users. Endofskull (talk) 01:14, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.