User talk:Zumoarirodoka

Bevanism

Please look at Bevanism and remove the tag if it has enough inline citations.--DThomsen8 (talk) 14:54, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Thank you very much for adding some extra citations Unfortunately, I still think the article is severely lacking in inline citations, but I still appreciate the help you're giving immensely. – Zumoarirodoka_(talk)^(email) 14:57, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Perhaps I will add some more. --DThomsen8 (talk) 12:33, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Panama Papers

Hi, you keep on reinstating a big paragraph into the Russia subsection of the 'Reactions' section. Please stop! Please note that the People section is where detailed allegations are going and so what you are doing is duplicating info, in the main. I wrote some of what you keep reinstating, so I hope you can accept that I don't want it to be excluded. But it isn't! Somehow someone else stuck it into the Russia subsection and it really shouldn't be there. I'm having great fun trying to explain to some others on the article Talk page that the stuff we have about Putin is not too much stuff, so when you add to the stuff about him in the Russia subsection it makes it doubly hard. All the very best to you. Boscaswell talk 21:38, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

@Boscaswell: I only re-added the content once, as far as I'm aware, but thank you for explaining the situation. Sorry to be a nuisance, and I wasn't attempting to edit war or anything like that. – Zumoarirodoka_(talk)^(email) 21:43, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

No worries, Zumo. Someone else has been doing it, then, as I've deleted it I think x3 today. Not as reversions, so I'm "safe", but...well...whatever. :-) All the best! Boscaswell talk 21:47, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

@Zumoarirodoka: pls don't edit the UK section for 10 minutes as I've been working on it to cleanup for hours and its doing my head in and I have to finish and i couldn't as you just had done an edit. Ta. Boscaswell talk 16:51, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

@Boscaswell: Fair enough. Sorry for any hassle caused. – Zumoarirodoka_(talk)^(email) 16:53, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

@Zumoarirodoka: no worries. You weren't to know. I finished what I wanted to do, thank goodness. Yay! Boscaswell talk 17:43, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016

Your addition to Panama Papers has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 00:02, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Zion in Age book

Ta for these edits. I have thus added it to my ever-growing non-PC bits reading list, due to the criticism it received ;). Zezen (talk) 04:03, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

You're very welcome, just glad I could be of help :P

And briefly looking (Redacted) per WP:COPYVIOEL - Ryk72 ^'c.s.n.s.' 13:53, 13 September 2016 (UTC) myself, the book certainly does look interesting and as controversial as it has been described. Hope it lives up to your expectations ;) – Zumoarirodoka_(talk)^(email) 15:07, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Diannaa (talk) 19:17, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

:@Diannaa: Which edits of mine are you referring to? – Zumoarirodoka_(talk)^(email) 19:35, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Never mind; I know which ones you mean now. – Zumoarirodoka_(talk)^(email) 19:44, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zumoarirodoka (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I disagree that the edits in question constitute copyvio; in any case, no attempt was given to discussion of contested content with me. The Panama Papers article in particular is a contentious one, and there have been many other editors on there who have added much more contentious material and have gone unpunished. – Zumoarirodoka_(talk)^(email) 19:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
(I would also like to add that I will be much more careful in the future with regards to adding material possible copyvio. – Zumoarirodoka_(talk)^(email) 20:12, 8 May 2016 (UTC))

Decline reason:

There's a warning about copyright violations just a little up this page. And I have to agree with Diannaa that it was a copyright violation. See also WP:NOTTHEM. Huon (talk) 20:54, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wiki Loves Pride 2016

As a participant of WikiProject LGBT studies, you are invited to participate in the third annual Wiki Loves Pride campaign, which runs through the month of June. The purpose of the campaign is to create and improve content related to LGBT culture and history. How can you help?

1. Create or improve LGBT-related Wikipedia pages and showcase the results of your work here
2. Document local LGBT culture and history by taking pictures at pride events and uploading your images to Wikimedia Commons
3. Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)

Looking for topics? The Tasks page, which you are welcome to update, offers some ideas and wanted articles.

This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. The group's mission is to develop LGBT-related content across all Wikimedia projects, in all languages. Visit the affiliate's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's talk page.

Thanks, and happy editing! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 20:55, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zumoarirodoka (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

My block has been in place for over one month now. I am sorry for the previous copyright violations and will be extra vigilant in the future. Thank you. – Zumoarirodoka_(talk)^(email) 00:02, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I think you should answer both the questions below before any unblock request is considered. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:44, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What is the relationship between you and User:Jupitusese? --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 00:19, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Please could you explain briefly, using your own words, what you believe Wikipedia's copyright policy to be. Also, can you think of some frequent errors people make that lead to copyright violation issues? Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 11:04, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:LimMeetsKim.jpeg

Thank you for uploading File:LimMeetsKim.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 15:31, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Enhanced-15382-1458985321-1.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Enhanced-15382-1458985321-1.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Zumoarirodoka. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Mao Tse-Tounge listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mao Tse-Tounge. Since you had some involvement with the Mao Tse-Tounge redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 02:29, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Robert West campaign poster.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Robert West campaign poster.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 07:11, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Lesbians against pit closures.PNG

A tag has been placed on File:Lesbians against pit closures.PNG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 07:18, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:DPRK Nuclear-FreeWorld.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:DPRK Nuclear-FreeWorld.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 15:55, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Stalin (1).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Stalin (1).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

We're on Twitter!

WikiLGBT is on Twitter!

Hello Zumoarirodoka! Follow the Wikimedia LGBT user group on Twitter at @wikilgbt for news, photos, and other topics of interest to LGBT Wikipedans and allies. Use #wikiLGBT to share any Wiki Loves Pride stuff that you would like to share (whether this month or any day of the year) or to alert folks to things that the LGBT Wikipedan community should know. RachelWex (talk) For more information about Wiki Loves Pride, → click here ←.

RachelWex 19:21, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Michelle of the Resistance.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Michelle of the Resistance.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

This is to inform you that an attempt is being made to overturn an RfC that you voted on

This is to inform you that an attempt is being made to overturn an RfC that you voted on (2 RfCs, actually, one less than six months ago and another a year ago). The new RfC is at:

Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#RfC: Allow private schools to be characterized as non-affiliated as well as religious, in infobox?

Specifically, it asks that "religion = none" be allowed in the infobox.

The first RfC that this new RfC is trying to overturn is:

• 15 June 2015 RfC: RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion.

The result of that RfC was "unambiguously in favour of omitting the parameter altogether for 'none' " and despite the RfC title, additionally found that "There's no obvious reason why this would not apply to historical or fictional characters, institutions etc.", and that nonreligions listed in the religion entry should be removed when found "in any article".

The second RfC that this new RfC is trying to overturn is:

• 31 December 2015 RfC: RfC: Religion in infoboxes.

The result of that RfC was that the "in all Wikipedia articles, without exception, nonreligions should not be listed in the Religion= parameter of the infobox.".

Note: I am informing everyone who commented on the above RfCs, whether they supported or opposed the final consensus. --Guy Macon (talk) 03:30, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Merger discussion for United States of Europe

An article that you have been involved in editing—United States of Europe—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Oldag07 (talk) 15:21, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Wickydkewl listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wickydkewl. Since you had some involvement with the Wickydkewl redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:48, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Workers Party of Ireland logo new.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Workers Party of Ireland logo new.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

May I delete my user page and all pages in my userspace?

@Diannaa: as I have not edited Wikipedia for a number of years now, would it be possible for my userpage and all pages in my userspace to be deleted? Thank you. --– Zumoarirodoka_(talk)^(email) 16:04, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) (can't remember why, now!) @Zumoarirodoka, normal answer would be "everything but the talk page". But, I see that, on the one hand, you appear to have been able of creating articles without copyvios, and on the other, if checkuser determines that you are unlikely to have socked in that time, the standard offer might be open to you. Apologies if you're aware of this and this message is unwelcome, and also apologies of course to Dianaa for preempting her answer.; it was a kind of FYI in case you thought "indefinite" meant permanent... —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia /cheap sh*t room} 17:13, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi Zumoarirodoka. I have gone ahead with the deletions as requested. The deleted pages are:

• User:Zumoarirodoka
• Zumoarirodoka/Classification of advocacy groups
• Zumoarirodoka/Contributions
• Zumoarirodoka/Methods used by advocacy groups
• Zumoarirodoka/Panama as a tax haven
• Zumoarirodoka/Politics
• Zumoarirodoka/Sandbox
• Zumoarirodoka/TWA/Earth
• Zumoarirodoka/TWA/Earth/2
• Zumoarirodoka/atheism
• Zumoarirodoka/common.js
• Zumoarirodoka/sandbox. Please let us know if you decide to resume editing one day, and an unblock can be looked at at that time. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:53, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Serial Number 54129, as stated at here to Berean Hunter, I do believe that Zumoarirodoka has socked. The evidence is there. And because there has been recent discussion at the Homophobia in ethnic minority communities article Zumoarirodoka created, I was waiting for Zumoarirodoka to pop back up. And now, today, I see that he has popped back up to make a comment here on his talk page. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 21:47, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

@Flyer22 Reborn: Thanks for this, I certainly don't intend spending too much time over the editor. Then CU is even more necessary: if the latest incident of socking is from January, then of course they are still a candidate for the SO. Although I guarantee that would garner far less support than if they haven't edited as they claim in two years...and not declaring all the accounts of course. Still, their choice I suppose. Take care! —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia /cheap sh*t room} 10:30, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Serial Number 54129, CheckUser only holds data for a limited time. Plus, it can be fooled; see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jdogno5/Archive. Because the CheckUser data did not connect him to his sock account, it took a year to get Jdogno5 indefinitely blocked even though the behavioral evidence was strong. Eventually, he was blocked for behavioral evidence after I'd gathered enough of it. So the CheckUser data not tying Zumoarirodoka to J.M.Ike or some other account doesn't mean that Zumoarirodoka hasn't socked. I think it's obvious that J.M.Ike is Zumoarirodoka, unless one wants to state that J.M.Ike is instead a WP:Meatpuppet. Anyway, I appreciate you trying to help out other editors, including looking to give them a second chance. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 18:24, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Understanding Pedophilia.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Understanding Pedophilia.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Acajenka (talk) 08:41, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

"Charles Lynton" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Charles Lynton. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 19#Charles Lynton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. NotReallySoroka (talk) (formerly DePlume) 02:51, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

"Charles Lynton Blair" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Charles Lynton Blair. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 19#Charles Lynton Blair until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. NotReallySoroka (talk) (formerly DePlume) 02:51, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bin-laden-road-to-peace independent.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bin-laden-road-to-peace independent.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

MfD nomination of TGBL

TGBL, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/TGBL and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of TGBL during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Bangalamania (talk) 02:09, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

"TGBL" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect TGBL. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 19#TGBL until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Bangalamania (talk) 11:20, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Peter Tatchell Foundation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter Tatchell Foundation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Tatchell Foundation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Blue Rasberry (talk) 21:38, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Homophobia in ethnic minority communities for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Homophobia in ethnic minority communities is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homophobia in ethnic minority communities until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GnocchiFan (talk) 19:50, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Busby's chair.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Busby's chair.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 10 March 2024 (UTC)