User talk:Z Police

July 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Z, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:39, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Z shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:39, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

"the edit you made to Z, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed"

constructive adjective

1. constructing or tending to construct; helping to improve; promoting further development or advancement (opposed to destructive ): constructive criticism.

Encyclopedia noun 1. a book, set of books, optical disc, mobile device, or online informational resource containing articles on various topics, usually in alphabetical arrangement, covering all branches of knowledge or, less commonly, all aspects of one subject.

Adding correct and verifiable information is at its core Constructive in that is helps to complete the over all descriptors of that being defined, please, share with me what your objections to my addition actually are. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Z Police (talk • contribs) 21:14, 8 July 2015‎

As the material has been reversed by two different editors, you need to establish consensus on the article talk page for the addition of the material rather than edit warring to try to force the content into the article. Please review WP:BRD as well as WP:EW.

I will discuss the details of the material at talk:Z. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 21:46, 8 July 2015 (UTC)