User talk:Xp54321/Archive 5

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

→

Archive 10

John 3:16

Hi, I see you reverted an edit to John_3:16 - without giving any particular reason - which added the LoLcat bible translation of John 3:16. The source of the translation is here: [1] so please assume good faith and do not revert edits merely because you are unfamiliar with a particular translation. Thanks! --82.226.191.237 (talk) 17:42, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Sorry about that. It looked like a text message or editing test or something like that which is why I reverted. Sorry about that.--Xp54321 ^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 17:44, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Its okay. I saw that the link was wrong (since its redirected to a section of the mail lolcat article, went to correct the link, and found my edit had gone! Yes, its an unusual and very modern translation for a younger audience 9but then, so are some of the other translations listed). Without a reference you were probably correct to revert it, on reflection. I added it back and corrected the link. --82.226.191.237 (talk) 17:49, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Nah, it;s my fault, I should have asked you what it was but I didn't so it is my fault.Xp54321 ^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 17:50, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for answering that question on my talk page. I haven't been doing much on Wikipedia other than logging in, checking my talk page and watchlist, and then logging out. Work hasn't been too kind on me. I added a busy template on my user page. If you see some question from a new user or anything (obviously one that doesn't relate to an article I'm working on or anything), feel free to answer it on my behalf. Thanks again. Kodster ^{(heLLo) (Me did that)} 23:26, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Your welcome Kodster. Anytime. --Xp54321 ^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 00:09, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Caspian blue

Xp,

there is no question of suspected sockpuppetry. Everything I am doing is quite open and for a specific legitimate purpose.

It was from the beginning, and is clearly documented.

You are kneejerking over a very minor issue without looking at a far more serious one. --58.94.56.254 (talk) 19:39, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Um...who are you?--Xp54321 ^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 20:42, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Lucyintheskywithdada. Xp, follow WP:DFTT and don't bother replying to this idiocy. – iridescent 02:00, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Motto of the day

Hello, I notice you're using one of the {{motd}} templates, run by Wikipedia:Motto of the day. You may have noticed that some of the mottos recently have been followed by a date from 2006, or on occasion simply "Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia". The reason for this is that Motto of the day is in some very serious need of help. Participation in the project, which has never been especially high, has dropped considerably over this past summer, to the point we have had several days where no motto was scheduled to appear at all. Over the past several weeks, I've been the only editor scheduling mottos at all, but there aren't enough comments on some of these mottos to justify their use. If we do not get some help - and soon - your daily mottos will stop. In order for us to continue updating these templates for you, we need your help.

When you get a chance between your normal editing, could you stop by our nominations page and leave a few comments on some of the mottos there, especially those that do not have any comments yet? This works very simply; you read a motto, decide whether or not you like it, and post your opinion just below the motto. That's it - no experience required, just an idea of what you personally like and what you feel reflects Wikipedia and its community. If you do have past experience with the project, then please close some of the older nominations once they've got a decent consensus going. There are directions on the nominations page on how to do this.

If you have any questions, please let me know, or post on the project's talk page. I'm looking forward to reading your comments on the suggested mottos, and any additional suggestions you'd like to make. Until then, happy editing! Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 02:43, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Re: What's happened

Hmmm. Nothing really incredible that I know of. The Abuse Filter seems to be very close to being approved, but you never know how something like that will go. Other than that, I don't know. I've been pretty busy IRL, so I haven't really been involved in much other than vandal-fighting. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 15:16, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Hey

I just removed your speedy delete template from Mr. Meaty - there was a legitimate article there before two hits of vandalism - Cluebot reverted just one of the vandalisms, leaving another one still there - oddly enough, from two hours ago.

I flipped it back to a decent edit. Bobo. 03:29, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Oh, thanks man. Huggle showed it as nothing more than vandalism(Due to the vandalism) which is why I tagged it.Hehe, sorry. Thanks!Xp54321 ^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 03:30, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

THE ZAPATISTA PARTY IS GOING TO GET YOU!

GET READY FOR PRISON! I hope a Mexican doesn't rape you there, racist piece-of-CRAP! --202.67.101.170 (talk) 03:51, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

MEXICAN PRIDE!

ZAPATISTA PRIDE!

Hey, what is that 2nd flag?--Xp54321 ^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 03:51, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

x_x;

Thanks for your help. That was hectic. --Enzuru 04:28, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

He has returned! --Enzuru 04:29, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Eh, I'm anti-.NET and may not even be on Windows when I'm editing Wikipedia. --Enzuru 04:30, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

The vandal who has been reverting is back under a separate IP. --Enzuru 04:32, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Ah.. nuts. Same article?--Xp54321 ^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 04:33, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

It actually has been around four articles. Three of which it started, and then the fourth when I guess he started following me around reverting anything I reverted. --Enzuru 04:34, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

I have just watchlisted two, and I'm reporting the IP.--Xp54321 ^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 04:35, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

LOL check this out: he warns ME! --Enzuru 04:51, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Too bad I'll miss the block....I gotta get some sleep.:( Take care of this vandal, k? :P--Xp54321 ^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 04:52, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Nighty night. --Enzuru 04:54, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Fumblingfoe

Giving the subject of an article on a living person vandalism warnings for removing information they consider inaccurate, and then reporting them as a vandal for it, is an appalling idea. Wikipedia takes biographies of living persons very seriously. Please don't do it again. Hut 8.5 15:58, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Huh? Where did this happen? Can you give me the diff? If I made amistake, I need to know where as to correct it.Xp54321 ^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 15:59, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

You reported then to AIV, citing this edit and this one as vandalism. Hut 8.5 16:03, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Ah..sorry it looked like vandalism, and I had no idea it was the person himself removing the material. Vandals sometimes do the same thing. Again, sorry, it won't happen again.--Xp54321 ^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 16:05, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

In appreciation

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		In appreciation of your contributions to Wikipedia.  Keep  up the fine work. Ecoleetage (talk) 02:43, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

 Just stopping by 

Wow, I just noticed this. :-) Anyway, I was just looking through most of your contributions, and just wanted to say great job with the vandalism reverting! You look like you've reformed from before when you misused rollback/huggle/etc. multiple times. Good work. Yours truly, RyRy (talk) 03:01, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Thank you very much RyRy. You've improved a lot as well.:D--Xp54321 ^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 03:13, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

King of Pop (album)

Can't believe it's a GA already, I didn't create it all that long ago. — Realist² 17:42, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

LOL, you create GAs like crazy R2.:P How's that list of supporters coming? :PXp54321 ^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 17:43, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Yikes, 42 percent according to the last update, I try not to look at it too much to be honest. I'm just enjoying the editing process at the moment and trying new things. Useight is my editing couch right now, he's pushing me to try new things but it's real fun. That recent changes button can be real intimidating to a mere editor such as myself. — Realist² 17:47, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Heh, have fun editing while you can, administrators these days are too busy to do much editing.....Xp54321 ^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 17:48, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

For what it's worth, you'd have my support if you ever ran for adminship :) I predict Xp will panic on seeing the orange bar! hehehe —— RyanLupin • (talk) 16:56, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Agh! I did panic as I was busy and unable to get on yesterday! :P--Xp54321 ^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 21:58, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

My RfA

Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a count of (154/3/2). I appreciate the community's trust in me, and I will do my best to be sure it won't regret handing me the mop. I am honored by your trust and your support. Again, thank you. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 18:08, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Yes! It passed! :D--Xp54321 ^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 01:38, 28 September 2008 (UTC)