User talk:Wizardman/Archive2
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thank you for evaluating the article and awarding it GA status. Hopefully, we can get FA soon. =) Nishkid64 02:50, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
WP:ADOPT
Hi there,
As a user looking to Adopt with the Adopt-a-User program, there has been some ongoing developments that we would like to bring to your attention, as well as request help with the backlog at Category:Wikipedians seeking to be adopted in Adopt-a-user.
You should know that the way the adoption process works has changed slightly. To decrease workload at Category:Wikipedians seeking to be adopted in Adopt-a-user on offering adoption please change the {{Adoptme}} template to {{Adoptoffer}} on the user's user page, and this will add the user to Category:Wikipedians having been offered adoption. Users that have already been offered adoption can always have a second or third offer, but by separating out those users that have not had an adoption offer yet, it is hoped that no one will go lacking. Once adoption is complete please use the templates found here on the Adoptee's and your user page.
Also numerous Adopters have been adding their details to a list of users available for adopting, to offer a more personalised service and allow new users to browse through and pick their own Adopter. The quickest way to adopt though, is still to contact users at the Category:Wikipedians seeking to be adopted in Adopt-a-user.
Furthermore a new Adopter's Area has been created where you can find useful resources and other Adopter's experiences. Please feel free to add any resources you have and if you know of any useful resources for new users / Adoptees then you can add them here.
So I hope you get adopting soon - and if you have any general questions or suggestions about the further development of Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User please bring them to our talk page. Cheers Lethaniol 15:25, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Third Opinion for Talk:Burk's_Falls, Ontario
Hi Wizardman. I noticed that Agha Nader re-added the Third Opinion request for that page even after your removed it. Since you already addressed it, and no further conflict erupted, I don't think he was supposed to do that. He is rather new, and his limited experience has been primarily with articles that I have edited, so he may not have known any better. In any case, do you think that you could re-remove it? I would do it myself, but that wouldn't look right since I am an involved party. The Behnam 00:02, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
My RfA
Hi. Thanks for your support during my RfA. I hope you don't mind me asking but I was wondering why you withdrew the comment you made about people opposing my candidacy because of my unwillingness to handle images. Please do feel free not to answer, it's an honest question with no intention other than to understand what's going on. I have to say that I am puzzled by the way the RfA has turned out and am quite saddened by the lack of trust of some of my fellow Wikipedians. Cheers, Pascal.Tesson 06:15, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot for the quick reply. You are probably right in saying that it's a bit late in the RfA to change the outcome. In any case, I certainly did not write to you with the intent of asking you to put the message back up. I was simply worried that you had suddenly decided that my inexperience with images was a perfectly good reason for not trusting me with admin tools. As I said, the whole process has seemed so Kafkaesque that I'm getting a bit paranoid! Best, Pascal.Tesson 06:35, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
TeckWiz's RFA
An article which you started, or significantly expanded, Fred Roberts, was selected for DYK!
|
On January 15, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Fred Roberts, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 23:05, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Your revisions on RfA discussions
I've noticed that you have a rather disconcerting habit at RfA of posting a comment and later revising your comment, usually by completely removing your previous comment, for example:
- Soman's RfA
- Newyorkbrad's RfA
- comment deleted on Pascal.Tesson's RfA, later restored here
While everyone is entitled to change their opinion, I do not think it wise to remove the record of why you "!voted" the way you did before the change. If you change your opinion, it is important to show that it has changed and important to show why you changed your mind. If someone took your previous comments into consideration something you had to say in forming his or her own opinion, it is helpful to at least have a record of what you said, and to let later commentators know that part of the foundation of their own opinion may have changed. Having the change apparent on the face of the RfA allows people to consider whether or not they need to rethink what they said.
A better practice is to stroke through your old submission, by putting "<s>" and "</s>" around the entirety of your old comment, including the signature, followed with the addition of "changed to ___" after the crossed-out submission. You can then add your newly revised opinion to the appropriate section.
If you really are uncertain as to how you intend to !vote, you may want to wait a bit longer before commenting. RfAs run for seven days, so there's no big rush. Agent 86 00:29, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Categorization
Nice to see you working on the important things again! :-) Cheers, Pascal.Tesson 03:40, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 15th, 2007.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 3 | 15 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:16, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
With regard to your comment in this AFD: I don't recommend you tell someone to request speedy deletion when they've split material from an article with the intent to get it deleted. It was not his own article to begin with. Splitting material to request its deletion is abusive and shouldn't be encouraged. - Mgm|(talk) 09:06, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
SLU Cleanup
Thanks for the cleanup of the "SLU Alum" userbox...just noticed it.
Cheers, --Jonashart 15:04, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Keeley Hazell
Is there a reason why you keep changing the spelling? It's generally accepted as having one l. ust wondering.--Wizardman 05:01, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- I keep correcting your vandalism. There is no such word as "modeling". Furthermore, Keeley is British and hence the proper English spelling is appropriate. Turkeyphant 05:11, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Trust me, correcting the spelling certainly is not vandalism. According to Model (person), my spelling's right. Although in the big scheme of things it doesn't even matter whih way it is.--Wizardman 05:15, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- No - but you weren't correcting the spelling, you were deliberately reverting my corrections. I have already demonstrated adequately why you should not revert my edits, please refrain from doing so. Turkeyphant 05:20, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Trust me, correcting the spelling certainly is not vandalism. According to Model (person), my spelling's right. Although in the big scheme of things it doesn't even matter whih way it is.--Wizardman 05:15, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
3RR
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Turkeyphant 06:03, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oh come on, you just posted that in retaliation. History shows I have yet to make 3 edits in 24 hours on that article.Wizardman 06:12, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Featured list candidates
Thanks for you supporting List of Yukon general elections in its candidacy for Featured List status. Would you consider voting on List of Prince Edward Island general elections (post-Confederation) on its FLC page? Tompw (talk) 12:42, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Happy Birthday!
|
Happy Birthday, Wizardman/Archive2, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! |
--Extranet (Talk | Contribs) 00:05, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
WP:COW??
Hi -
In Wikipedia:User_categories_for_discussion#Category:User_en you made a reference to "WP:COW". That page doesn't appear to exist. What is this?
Thanks -- Tim Pierce 03:18, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
GA Oops-Leon review
Hey there. I have appealed your decision regarding Oops-Leon at Wikipedia:Good_articles/Review. I don't see what the article is missing, and I'm asking for are more concrete suggestions for ways I can meet the criterion you feel the article has failed. Any comments you can make would be appreciated. -- SCZenz 18:20, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Re: WP:WPBIO assessments
Hi, Wizardman. Sorry to give you more work deleting striked assessments. When I have time as both an article creator and sometime assessor I find the other people's notes instructive. But I am pretty new to the project. Don't the other reviewers do this? -Susanlesch 19:29, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oh and Happy Birthday! -Susanlesch 19:32, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Uncyclopiedia AfD
The third nomination was kept for less than one day, hardly enough time for anyone to voice their concerns about the article. The entire article self references itself and is poorly documented and sourced. The whole article needs a re-write in its current state. I'm going to post another AfD in about 3 or 4 days if the article does not remove self references and clean itself up, there as removing the need for deletion in the first place. Stexe 10:28, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
Newyorkbrad's RfA
Thank you for your support on my RfA, which closed favorably this morning, as well as your open-mindedness in reconsidering your initial !vote. I appreciate the confidence the community has placed in me and am looking forward to my new responsibilities. Please let me know if ever you have any comments or suggestions, especially as I am learning how to use the tools. Best regards, Newyorkbrad 19:44, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
My RfA
WP Bigraphy Assessments
I just got your message. First of all, I would like to apologize if my actions offended you in any way. With the exception of the Budd Dwyer article, all of the articles I have submitted in the last couple of hours are articles that I created, and I don't feel that I can objectively assess them. --TommyBoy 05:41, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 22nd, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 4 | 22 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
| Wikipedia modifies handling of "nofollow" tag | WikiWorld comic: "Truthiness" |
| News and notes: Talk page template, milestones | Wikipedia in the News |
| Features and admins | The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:54, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
My RfA
Thanks for taking the time to review my contributions and contribute to my RfA. I withdrew when it became clear that the uphill climb had crossed the snowball threshold, but I appreciate your feedback and the process gave me some good ideas for other ways I can be contributing to Wikipedia. I'll work on the areas that came up in the discussion, and try again after I've gained wider experience. -FisherQueen (Talk) 12:27, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your support
 |
As you set out for Ithaka, hope the voyage is long Don't expect Ithaka to make you rich. Ithaka gave you the marvelous journey |
A. Leon Higginbotham, Jr.
I noticed that you added the rating for the A. Leon Higginbotham, Jr. entry. Any suggestions you have as to how to improve it would be appreciated. Cheers, JCO312 05:24, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
RFA nominiation
I have thought about being an admin and I do want to become one. However, I am going on a short little vacation on Jan 25-28 so I think we should wait until after that to go through RFA. I put together a page answering the most common RFA questions I saw at User:Mecu/RFAQ awhile ago. I'll work on the answers, especially for the empty ones. If you have any comments about the answers (especially #5 about punitive block) I will welcome them. Thank you for the offer to nomination, and once I return from my trip we can officially get started. --MECU≈talk 23:54, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- I had sent something to Wizardman, so his talk was on my watchlist. When I saw your thing about running for RFA, I was startles the you weren't an admin already! Just a little advice, though they may make an exception for someone with your contributions, many people oppose or go neutral for not a long time on the project (about < 1 year). --TeckWizTalk Contribs@ 00:32, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- (I'm responding to TechWiz on your page here since he'll see it here too) I have been around for 6+ months, and heavily active for 3 of those months (1000+ edits a month I define as heavily active), sans a few months where I was busy with real life (October). I am aware that people vote short terms on RFAs, but if you look at Image:SuccessRatevsEditsatRfA.png, even considering I only have 2000 or so article space edits, it seems my experience should be okay, I could see if it's 3 months, but 7+ (by the time I RFA)? Shouldn't be a real issue IMHO, but thank you for the advice. --MECU≈talk 01:06, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Third opinion request for assistance
I am asking for your help and opinion on an issue that I am having with User:SndrAndrss over this template {{Nordic skiing World Championships}} for the FIS Nordic World Ski Championships. The one I have is for the years only while SndrAndrss has both the location and the years. I have tried to talk it over with him on three occassions over the last eight weeks without success, including reverting back to the original settings. I am aware of the iw links of this template having the championship locations with them, but to me they seem redundant. Please have a look at this and issue comments on this so we can settle this dispute once and for all, and to avoid an inevitable edit war. Thank you. Chris 02:50, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, the language template you are looking at is es-1 (Spanish). The top one above is So-E, which is English with a Southern United States accent. Thank you for the comment though. Chris 19:59, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
substing warnings
When using certain template tags on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:test}} instead of {{test}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template.
I'm sure you meant to subst bv when you added it to User talk:Aberkooje. By the way, there are some new improved user warning templates available now. Great job in your anti-vandalism work. MKoltnow 20:16, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Congradulations
Congradulations, Wizardman! There is a 99.999...% change you will become an administrator in less than 2 hours. I'm very happy for you! Again, congradulations! Kamope · talk · contributions 00:44, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, you will be an admin in 14 minutes... Kamope · talk · contributions 02:04, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- ...4 minutes... Kamope · talk · contributions 02:14, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- ...3 minutes... Kamope · talk · contributions 02:15, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- ...2 minutes... Kamope · talk · contributions 02:16, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- ...1 minute... Kamope · talk · contributions 02:17, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- Congradulations! you are now admin. Have fun using the shiny tools! Again, congradulations! Kamope · talk · contributions 02:19, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Well technically, now you're an admin as now you've got the tools. Go forth and, uh, use them well. Don't hesitate to ask questions if you're unsure and re-read the policies as needed. Have fun helping to keep the project improving. Congratulations- Taxman Talk 02:50, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- Vongrats Wizardman. hoping to see you at FLC in the future. All the best, Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:52, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- Abra cadabra...Wizardman is now an admin! I just saw you at the AIV, great job :). Cheers! Do us proud. ~ Arjun 03:16, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- congrats bud. Have fun blocking vandals. Don't forget to check their contribs, yada, yada, yada... alphachimp 03:16, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- Congrats :) Daniel.Bryant 07:06, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- Well done old chap. The Rambling Man 08:17, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Karen Back
The redirect is inappropriate. It causes the link on The Norwegian Society to lead to Karen Lancaume, which is obviously wrong. --Klausok 07:44, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
I do not know enough about her to even start an article. The only thing I know is that Wessel wrote her a poem thanking her for mending his coat. I was under the impression that she was a waitress of the tavern where the society met, not a member. --Klausok 07:53, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi, congratulations on becoming an admin. It's always nice to see another new participant at WP:RFP. One minor point - make sure you indent your repsonses. The bot that archives the page (when it's running; it seems to be having a few glitches every now and then) only recognises a request as fulfilled when the response is indented. Otherwise, keep up the good work! --Robdurbar 14:06, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice!! Tellyaddict 17:38, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- OMG GET OUT OF RFPP! THAT'S MY TURF! Congratulations, Wizardman. If you need any help, feel free to contact me. =) Nishkid64 18:31, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Proposed deletions
Hey. I noticed you have been deleting prods with the reason "prod tag up for 5 days" (or similar). I know there are a few admins who do this a lot, but it really isn't a good idea, as it makes it impossible for anyone to know the actual reason for the article's deletion. Please try to at least copy and paste the prod reason when deleting. Thanks! --- RockMFR 04:44, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Re: SProtect on SuperTed.
Thank you very much for assisting me with the issue concerning the SuperTed article. I am very appreciative of the fact that people like you exist and help those of us who cannot lockdown articles to stop people from screwing around with them. I am hoping somewhere in the future that we may be able to get a wikiproject started concerning Children's television so that we may be able to have a bit more clout with what happens to the pages! Thank you once again. I would award you an Anti Vandalism Barnstar, but I have no idea how... Scratch that. You have been awarded a barnstar! See Barnstar Award on User page Thor Malmjursson 12:45, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 29th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 5 | 29 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 19:02, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Sprotect on science
Can anybody add this thing, or do you have to be an admin to do it? Every so often I run across an article like science or certain of the chemical elements, which seems to be unsually vandalized by IPs. No doubt by students pissed off that they have to do some science project, and who want to take out their frustration on the subject. So sprotect is a very useful tool. What do I have to do, to be able use it? SBHarris 03:09, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Copyright concerns for MTTLR page
I'd like to ensure that the Michigan Telecommunications and Tech. Law Review pages don't get taken down due to copyright concerns. I've tried to edit the page and explicitly state the link to our page is external. Please let me know what, if anything, else I have to do to comply with wikipedia's copyright concerns. Thanks! Mttlr 04:08, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Huang Biren
Hi, Please DO NOT delete the table on the awards section. You are spoiling the artcle by doing this. I would put back the awards section of the article. Please do not delete it again. Thank you very much :) fatty 09:43, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your note (of last month) on my talk page. No, I'm not missing, but just doing lots of other things. I've updated my page to reflect my current status more accurately.
Best of luck!
Cje 10:31, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
SndrAndrss is at it again
Hello. I just wanted to let you know that User:SndrAndrss is at it again on the {{Nordic skiing World Championships}} I had to revert an edit he had done on the template again. Apparently, he has not learned his lesson on this. I hope I do not have to take it mediation, but I am getting very close to doing so. Chris 23:51, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
- User:SndrAndrss did it again and I reverted him again. I do not want to pull another revert within the next seven and half hours to ensure a block, but I don't think he is listening at all. Chris 16:14, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Block
Thanks ;-) Happy Editing by Snowolf(talk) on 17:03, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Where do I put suggestions of Wikipedia policy??
Hey, I would like to suggest that Wikipedia permits embedding videos onto articles. I would be surprised if this hasn't been suggested before, but I don't know where to start looking for discussions of wikipedia policy. Could you help?
Incidentally, my arguments would have been that Encarta has always had videos embedded onto it, and just tonight I have seen Sky News use a YouTube video in one of their reports.
I asked you because you have just been passed as an admin, and were the only one who had a username that seemed to be in English.
Thanks, --Macca7174 20:42, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
My RfA
Hi Wizardman,
Thanks for participating in my recent RfA. Even though it was ultimately successful (at 54-13-11), I value all of the feedback and have already benefited from the community's suggestions. Hope to see you around. - Gilliam 22:10, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 5th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 6 | 5 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:36, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Replied!
Just wanted to let you know that I replied to your inquiry on my talk page. Hope its more to your liking. ;) thadius856talk|airports|neutrality 06:17, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
My RFA
 |
My request for adminship was closed a day early with a tally of 98/0/3, so I am now an administrator. Thanks very much for your confidence. If there's anything I can ever do to help, please don't hesitate to contact me. If I screw up, please feel free to let me know about that, too. Kafziel Talk 15:49, 7 February 2007 (UTC) |
Review
Hi, I noticed you have expressed interest 666in reviewing sports articles in general. I am actually not sure how articles get reviewed or who should review them, but would you be kind enough to look at the Toronto Raptors article as it has been nominated as a GA? Thanks Chensiyuan 11:53, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
RFA
Hi. Will do. Just too many things on my plate right now. Sorry. I'll put it up as soon as I can. Thanks. Xiner (talk, email) 15:38, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Alright, it's out of my hands now. Please visit Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/VegaDark. Thanks. Xiner (talk, email) 20:29, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Locking articles
I noticed there has been alot of recent activity vandalizing the Dane Cook article (not a fan, just happened to surf in from wiki article on a movie he is appearing in this summer). It seems that locking arti666cles so that only registered users can edit them cuts way down on vandalization. What's the easiest way to go about doing that, as I will probably have need of that kind of protection again some time. RoyBatty42 03:00, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
I was hoping you might consider reviewing your rejection of my semi-protect request. The regular editor of this article has filed a mediation request at Medcab. Given the other editors are IPs who don't explain their deletions its difficult to see how to start a dialog. One could message them on their talkpages but most anon editors have no idea they have talkpages. I'm not convinced that it a question of simple vandalism as it is apparently a controversial topic and there's quite a bit of unsourced content in the article. Semi-protection seems the only way to ensure that everyone discusses what should be in the article and how it should be sourced. Resolving the dispute seems impossible without it. WjBscribe 05:31, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'm not very familiar with the subject matter myself which is why I'd like the IP(s) to discuss it. But the article's author accepted that there may be genuine controversy 666and there was an argument earlier in the page's history as to whether this was a valid denomination or a sect. WjBscribe 05:37, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks!
Thanks for the Caveman lock. Much appreciated, MrZaiustalk 05:34, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Re:RfA
Well gawsh, thank you! I have actually been thinking of putting one in so I'd like to accept your kind offer. Only thing is this: I just got a job a couple days ago, so I'll be busy for about 7 hours a day and won't be able to respond to questions right away and so on. Do you think this will be a problem? (I guess that'dynamite hcaks the boat most folks are in anyway). If it won't be a problem, let's go ahead and do it. Well thanks again for your offer! Peace, delldot | talk 03:36, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Well thanks for the nom. I've just added the page to RfA, so hopefully I haven't bungled anything up! By the way, I'm female, not that it matters at all, just thought I should mention it. Thanks again! Peace, delldot | talk 00:24, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Brett Favre Page Issue
Hi, on user PSUMark2006 talk page there has been a big discussion on the Brett Favre page issue and if you can check his talk page you will see PSUMark2006 has come to the conclusion that all of BeverlyHills85 edits are ver666ifiable and there shouldn't be a problem re-adding them to the article, and the only thing is that user PSUMark2006 has emailed NFL.com, ESPN.com and ProFootballReference.com about Favre career attempts is actually 8,223 or 8,224, and they should get back to him sortly, but 5 sites say 8,224 and only one say 8,223, so we are thinking the one is a typing error, but all is explained in the PSUMark2006 talk page and all the items in BeverlyHills85 edit is correct and factual and proof is in the PSUMark2006 talk page, Thanks, Malibu55 06:12, 13 February 2007 (UTC)mailbu55
Re:RfA
Well gawsh, thank you! I have actually been thinking of putting one in so I'd like to accept your kind offer. Only thing is this: I just got a job a couple days ago, so I'll be busy for about 7 hours a day and won't be able to respond to questions right away and so on. Do you think this will be a problem? (I guess that'dynamite hcaks the boat most folks are in anyway). If it won't be a problem, let's go ahead and do it. Well thanks again for your offer! Peace, delldot | talk 03:36, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Well thanks for the nom. I've just added the page to RfA, so hopefully I haven't bungled anything up! By the way, I'm female, not that it matters at all, just thought I should mention it. Thanks again! Peace, delldot | talk 00:24, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
sprot
Hi - no need to apologize. On the contrary - several Obama editors agree that sprot is needed, and will be for a while, and that it doesn't spell the death of wikipedia. It's far worse to allow the garbage that some IPs have posted to stand for anyone to see. Some Obama editors lobby hard for not having sprot, or for having it for very short period of time, but in my view it's illogical, because he is squarely in the spotlight, controversial, and attracts a certain kind of targeted vandalism that is very destructive to the reputation of the overall project. So thanks for keeping a neutral eye on this page and for jumping in with sprot - I would predict that voices will be heard pretty shortly to remove it "to see" what will happen, but it's clear to me what will happen because it happens each time sprot is removed, so I can't understand their insistence. Anyway, from one regular editor over there, thanks. (You can see the talk page and archivehaxor666s for the discussions if you're interested.) Tvoz | talk 16:59, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks!
Hi there, thanks for your honest opinionons on my editor review, Even if it is neutral/negative I'm glad you voiced your honest opinion. On my failed RfA from early january most people suggested I get my mainspace contribs to 3,000 so I've just stuck with that, I hope you understand my point of view as I understand yours.TellyaddictEditor review! 10:38, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Image
Could you delete this image? I uploaded it under the same name on Commons, I'm not sure how that will affect the situation. Thanks. Quadzilla99 18:57, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Just wondering... when you tried to relist this AFD, why on earth did you blank the AFD subpage diff? For some odd reason you then added it to the bottom of the subpage for an entirely different AFD [1]. Looking at your contributions, I don't see where you relisted it on the log for the 11th. Did you? Or was that what you were trying to do when you pasted it onto the bottom of Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Court_calendar? If it's not been added maybe we should just go ahead and add it to today's log to give it a fair shot. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 22:13, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Lynn rogoff
Having fun with your shiny new zap gun and LART? If you have a minute, can you have a peek at Lynn rogoff. I tagged as a G12 copyvio of the imdb article http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0737360/bio but the tag has since been removed. From my cynical perspective, if it's not a copyvio, then it's probably a G11. I don't particularly want to get into a tag war with the creator. Can you have a loo666k? Many thanks, Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:45, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Camino Real Middle School
Alright, thanks.--Don't call the popo 02:03, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Camino Real Middle School
is this better? BADAT!! ( i can't format good ) --Deadman 14-0 03:47, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 12th, 2007.
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 7 | 12 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost 666spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:46, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
I noticed that you have looked over several basketball articles for GA such the Olajuwon article I worked on the Toronto Raptors article that is currently a GA nominee. I'd like to ask a favor of you: Bill Russell's article is a Featured Article Candidate and I'm worried that it may not pass merely because there are not enough reviewers looking it over. Would you mind looking it over and seeing if you feel it meets the criteria. Here is the candidacy page. If you have any issues with the article please just comment on them on the candidacy page and we'll try to fix them. Thanks in advance. Quadzilla99 08:56, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Ebony Anpu AfD
Hello. You recently commented and/or voted on the AfD for the Ebony Anpu article here. FYI, the AfD has been reset because the discussion was not about the merits of the article, but instead about procedural issues. You are welcome to leave a new comment about whether or not the article should be included here, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ebony Anpu. In order to be as fair as possible to the article's creators and those who feel it should be deleted, all comments about Wikipedia deletion procedure as it relates to this specific AfD are being directed to the AfD's talk page, here. Thanks for your time, and sorry for the wikispam. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 18:03, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
re: the AfD of Mrs. Puff
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Mrs. Puff. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 21:45, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Lansdowne Elementary School
Thank you for notifying me of your move to tag my article for deletion. May I know what proves notability for an American public elementary school? Thanks! --Anthony6665429 02:47, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Everything has been moved from the three categories, so they can be deleted if applicable. — J Greb 07:08, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
reverting {humorous} vandalism on my userpage
Thanks, I appreciate it. Keep up the good wikipedia-ing! Cornell Rockey 15:34, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
NN middle school
We were both prod'ing that middle school at the same time. :) Cheers, Fang Aili talk 22:17, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
VegaDark's Request for Adminship
Thank you for supporting my RfA. It was successful at a unanimous 52/0/0. I hope I can live up to the kind words expressed of me there, and hope to now be more of an asset to the community with access to the tools. Please feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any suggestions for me in the future. Thanks again! VegaDark 06:41, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
RfD page
Could you take a quick look at the RfD page? I think you may have inadvertently incorporated some stuff about another category while marking a speedy delete for --Orange Mike 15:48, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- Excellent! --Orange Mike 16:02, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Zzuuzz's RfA
Hi Wizardman. I've transcluded my RfA nom, courtesy of your fine self. Thanks for the support. -- zzuuzz(talk) 21:42, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Kiarostami assessment
Hi there! I am going to nominate Abbas Kiarostami for A-class soon. It is now under peer review. It would be nice if you could take a look at it, comment on it or improve it. Thanks and have a nice day. Sangak 16:08, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
I was the one who asked for the peer review and I was wondering if you could go a little more in-depth about your comments. What needs referencing? and What kind of sprucing-up needs to be done on the article? Any ideas are greatly appreciated. Cheers! --tennisman sign here! 19:51, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- Anything about the "sprucing up" that you entioned? --tennisman sign here! 20:06, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- okay, great. Thanks for your input. If you don't mind, I'm going to copy-paste your comments into the article's review. --tennisman sign here! 20:13, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
What I'm thinking of doing is simply removing the whole trivia list and placing it on Records Held by Roger Federer. What would you think of that? --tennis</fosatannt>man sign here! 20:22, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
RFA x 2
You nom'd me for Admin back in Jan and I declined. Someone else just nom'd me and since it has occurred twice in less than two months, I took the plunge. I thought you'd like to know. See Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Rlevse 2.Rlevse 02:33, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 19th, 2007.
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 8 | 19 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line &nbsdtomp;| Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:42, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
RFC Jeffrey O. Gustafson
Hi there. I notice you participated in an AfD with Jeffrey O. Gustafson. I have recently opened this RFC about that Admin. Just thought I should let you know. Thanks Captain Barrett 04:22, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
List of coil knots
Hi. I noticed you recently speedied List of coil knots for being a redirect to a category. This isn't really a criteria for speedy deletion. There are hundreds of others like it and we really haven't established much precedent regarding this issue at Rfd. --- RockMFR 07:42, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
- Can you respond to this? --- RockMFR 21:43, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Sonic imformation
The honda sonic 0-100 has been modified. I am not sure if you are the one who changed it, but I personaly tested the bike on stock parts. Certanely there is an 0-100 faster than just 14.8 seconds.
Sorry if your not the person. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Blackraven36 (talk • contribs) 10:59, 22 February 2007 (UTC).