User talk:Wilkinsonp

Conflict of Interest: Great Britain at the Olympics

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Great Britain at the Olympics, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Your edit has been reverted. Regards, Yboy83 (talk) 12:53, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest: British Olympic Association

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article British Olympic Association, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Your edit has been reverted. Regards, Yboy83 (talk) 12:53, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Whilst i agree about the problem with the conflict of interest, always feel free to update information about changes to peoples roles in such an organisation. The BOA article had been inaccurate for almost two months until your edit today when you removed Simon Clegg as the Secretary General which should of happened in December. As your edit was undone i have removed him again thanks. BritishWatcher (talk) 19:57, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked for obvious sock puppetry per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wilkinsonp. After the block expires in a week's time, please stick to one account. Thanks, PeterSymonds (talk) 19:09, 21 February 2009 (UTC)