User talk:Wheatzilopochtli

Welcome!

Hello, Wheatzilopochtli! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages.

Getting Started Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 17:48, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Drafted players are not contracted to their draft teams

Hello! I’ve noticed that several of your recent edits have included adding a PWHL team to player articles for PWHL draft selections. While I share your excitement for the new league and today’s draft, it is important to keep in mind that Wikipedia only records player movements that are verified by contract (either signing or trade). No players drafted today have been signed to contracts with their draft teams and are, therefore, not members of those teams until a contract has been signed. At least one GM has already made clear that selecting a player in the draft will not guarantee a roster spot following training camp. Cheers, Spitzmauskc (talk) 01:31, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Seamus Casey (ice hockey) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Seamus Casey (ice hockey). Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:54, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seamus Casey (ice hockey) has been accepted

Seamus Casey (ice hockey), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:55, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Graeme Clarke has been accepted

Graeme Clarke, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:33, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samu Salminen (November 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kilaseell was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Samu Salminen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– Kilaseell - Message me! - 19:45, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Wheatzilopochtli! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – Kilaseell - Message me! - 19:45, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samu Salminen has been accepted

Samu Salminen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Kline • talk to me! • contribs 22:06, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Josh Filmon has been accepted

Josh Filmon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tails Wx 21:47, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Jack Hughes

Do not reinstate this edit, because the standard is to list all in a single line. In addition, WP:BRD quite clearly says to start a discussion when you are first reverted, but you are choosing an WP:EW instead. Please stop it. – sbaio 15:27, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

@Sbaio:

My bad, sorry. To be fair, WP:BRD is not mandatory and I had not violated WP:EW. You could have explained on the first revert instead of just saying "fixed," and per WP:EW being technically right doesn't mean you wouldn't also be guilty of edit warring if you reverted a third edit.

The reference should be reverted, the new one makes no mention of the 2023 game. Wheatzilopochtli (talk) 15:41, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

WP:BRD is not mandatory, but it is basically how we avoid useless edit wars. In addition, nowhere did I say that you were edit warring or violated WP:EW, and just indicated that instead of discussing you are choosing the other path. If the reference that you are referring to is about the 2023 game then I restored it, because I initially did not see that you did not add the 2024 game, which I just added to the table. – sbaio 15:56, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Wheatzilopochtli. Thank you for your work on Gleb Trikozov. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:15, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Wheatzilopochtli. Thank you for your work on Ryder Ritchie. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:24, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Wheatzilopochtli. Thank you for your work on Ryerson Leenders. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:02, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for being the first person to add to my article drafts. Here's to documenting the 2024 Draft :) OnlyNano 21:42, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sam Dickinson (ice hockey) has been accepted

Sam Dickinson (ice hockey), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Kline • talk to me! • contribs 13:39, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Wheatzilopochtli. Thank you for your work on Jade Downie-Landry. Cocobb8, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I've marked the article as reviewed, but it requires more reliable sources that are not just passing mentions to help establish notability.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Cocobb8}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 20:38, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

@Cocobb8:

I find it hard to believe that notability has not been established with the sources provided. Among the sources are articles entirely about her from La Presse, The Hockey News, and multiple McGill University publications, as well as a video interview with Hockey Canada and multiple non-trivial mentions in articles from a variety of sources. Yes, there are a lot of articles from McGill Athletics, but they are not the majority. Additionally, although there is no specific guideline for women's hockey like there is in men's, she has received preeminent honors in U Sports and the PHF, and she is a PWHL player. I also find it strange that it only took four minutes from the time that the article was moved to mainspace for you to go through all 19 citations and come to such a conclusion. Wheatzilopochtli (talk) 20:49, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for sharing your concerns. The amount of sources is not what determines notability, but their quality. The point here of the tag I added is so that other editors know that more sources are required for this article. In the case of this article, the criteria for notability in sports would apply, which is itself more demanding than the general WP:GNG. Though I may be wrong in my conclusion that more sources are required, if another reviewer comes to the opposing conclusion, they should remove the tag. Furthermore, from the sources listed here, I have not found enough that are considered reliable besides La Presse. I also wanted to point out that the interview you are talking about would be considered a primary source
and hence would not be considered a reliable source.

Please let me know if you have any other questions. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 21:00, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

@Cocobb8 The Hockey News is a publication of Sports Illustrated, so it would also count. Wheatzilopochtli (talk) 21:41, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zayne Parekh (March 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zayne Parekh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 10:09, 11 March 2024 (UTC)