User talk:Wes!

; Archives
	December 7, 2005 – May 16, 2006; May 16, 2006 – March 10, 2007; March 10, 2007 – March 15, 2009; ;

Please note: This page is not censored. It may contain personal attacks as a result of the work I do with vandalism reverts. That being said, I welcome your comments, whatever their nature.

talk:[edit]

please remove at that afd user:Ilikepiepieisawesomeright's comments and another one that responded to it please. they are banned. 98.90.28.192 (talk) 22:35, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

At this point, you've completely failed to recognize that you cannot delete warnings from your own user:talk space. I am not in a position to help you, I'm sorry. Wes!  ^T _c

what exactly is the probablem with that? Oh, and, yeah, just clink the undo feature for this revision, in which I reverted myself. 98.90.28.192 (talk) 22:37, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, but that user is banned, so undo the revision please. 98.90.28.192 (talk) 22:46, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Kevin Covais and others[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated articles are Kevin Covais, Lisa Tucker (singer). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to the relevant discussion pages: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Covais for Kevin Covais, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Tucker (singer) for Lisa Tucker (singer). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 02:02, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day![edit]

Happy First Edit Day, Wes!, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!

File:18th Birthday.jpg

--MisterWiki talk contribs 00:14, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Albums recorded at Abbey Road Studios[edit]

Thanks There are two main articles there and I'm working from that. Otherwise, I am using "What links here" from Abbey Road Studios. If you want to start there, feel free. Thanks again. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:36, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback[edit]

I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback correctly, and for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. Tim Song (talk) 14:28, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes[edit]

Hi, how about getting reviewer rights? WP:PERM/RW has been open for a while, go grab 'em! —ΩpenTheWindows™ 19:40, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

—DoRD (talk) 22:02, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Kurt Halsey[edit]

I have nominated Kurt Halsey, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kurt Halsey. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Fæ (talk) 17:32, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:50-States-Project.gif listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:50-States-Project.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:11, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:John Farrar.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:John Farrar.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 14:17, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:ProtestAndPrejudice.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:ProtestAndPrejudice.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:29, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Hbhsbelltower-1.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Hbhsbelltower-1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:58, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SuburbanLegendsSL.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SuburbanLegendsSL.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:41, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Whatdisaycharles.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Whatdisaycharles.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:05, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]