User talk:Wertuose

Speedy deletion nomination of Azerlotereya[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Azerlotereya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 18:39, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Azerlotereya (September 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Azerlotereya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Azerlotereya, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 14:48, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wertuose! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 14:48, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Gambling in Azerbaijan[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Gambling in Azerbaijan indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:41, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Azerlotereya (September 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Azerlotereya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Azerlotereya, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 22:03, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Azerlotereya[edit]

Hello, Wertuose. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Azerlotereya, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:00, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Azerlotereya[edit]

Hello, Wertuose. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Azerlotereya".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:22, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Khalik Mammadov for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Khalik Mammadov, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khalik Mammadov until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:00, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sumgayit Technologies Park for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sumgayit Technologies Park, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sumgayit Technologies Park until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 01:03, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request[edit]

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Wertuose (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think it was a result of improper analysis, because as it seems I was blocked not because of my edits on en-wiki. I have 1000 edits in 16 years and just 8 in last 2 years. 42% of all my edits are small edits (less than 20 bytes). I mostly correct mistakes in articles and very rarely create articles. I created maybe 6-7 articles on en-wiki. I even did not participate in discussions last years. The last discussion I was involved was one where my name was mentioned and which led to my block. Also, it seems that my offline wiki activity was misunderstood. Despite the fact that I indicated that I am the contact person of Azerbaijani Wikimedians User Group, I did not take into account that many users are not familiar with Wikimedia movement, and I should have indicated this in more detail. Since me as the user group official organize off-wiki meetings, conferences, wikicamps and so on I know many active users from Azerbaijan and this probably gave rise to some guesses. Please make a correct analysis of my situation.--Wertuose (talk) 08:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I think it was a result of improper analysis, because as it seems I was blocked not because of my edits on en-wiki. I have 1000 edits in 16 years and just 8 in last 2 years. 42% of all my edits are small edits [https://xtools.wmcloud.org/ec/en.wikipedia.org/Wertuose (less than 20 bytes)]. I mostly correct mistakes in articles and very rarely create articles. I created maybe 6-7 articles on en-wiki. I even did not participate in discussions last years. The last discussion [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=1196395474 I was involved] was one where my name was mentioned and which led to my block. Also, it seems that my offline wiki activity was misunderstood. Despite the fact that I indicated that I am the contact person of [[:m:Azerbaijani Wikimedians User Group|Azerbaijani Wikimedians User Group]], I did not take into account that many users are not familiar with [[Wikimedia movement]], and I should have indicated this in more detail. Since me as the user group official organize off-wiki meetings, conferences, wikicamps and so on I know many active users from Azerbaijan and this probably gave rise to some guesses. Please make a correct analysis of my situation.--[[User:Wertuose|Wertuose]] ([[User talk:Wertuose#top|talk]]) 08:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I think it was a result of improper analysis, because as it seems I was blocked not because of my edits on en-wiki. I have 1000 edits in 16 years and just 8 in last 2 years. 42% of all my edits are small edits [https://xtools.wmcloud.org/ec/en.wikipedia.org/Wertuose (less than 20 bytes)]. I mostly correct mistakes in articles and very rarely create articles. I created maybe 6-7 articles on en-wiki. I even did not participate in discussions last years. The last discussion [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=1196395474 I was involved] was one where my name was mentioned and which led to my block. Also, it seems that my offline wiki activity was misunderstood. Despite the fact that I indicated that I am the contact person of [[:m:Azerbaijani Wikimedians User Group|Azerbaijani Wikimedians User Group]], I did not take into account that many users are not familiar with [[Wikimedia movement]], and I should have indicated this in more detail. Since me as the user group official organize off-wiki meetings, conferences, wikicamps and so on I know many active users from Azerbaijan and this probably gave rise to some guesses. Please make a correct analysis of my situation.--[[User:Wertuose|Wertuose]] ([[User talk:Wertuose#top|talk]]) 08:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I think it was a result of improper analysis, because as it seems I was blocked not because of my edits on en-wiki. I have 1000 edits in 16 years and just 8 in last 2 years. 42% of all my edits are small edits [https://xtools.wmcloud.org/ec/en.wikipedia.org/Wertuose (less than 20 bytes)]. I mostly correct mistakes in articles and very rarely create articles. I created maybe 6-7 articles on en-wiki. I even did not participate in discussions last years. The last discussion [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=1196395474 I was involved] was one where my name was mentioned and which led to my block. Also, it seems that my offline wiki activity was misunderstood. Despite the fact that I indicated that I am the contact person of [[:m:Azerbaijani Wikimedians User Group|Azerbaijani Wikimedians User Group]], I did not take into account that many users are not familiar with [[Wikimedia movement]], and I should have indicated this in more detail. Since me as the user group official organize off-wiki meetings, conferences, wikicamps and so on I know many active users from Azerbaijan and this probably gave rise to some guesses. Please make a correct analysis of my situation.--[[User:Wertuose|Wertuose]] ([[User talk:Wertuose#top|talk]]) 08:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}