User talk:Welhaven

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Welhaven! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! SMP0328. (talk) 20:58, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Vandalism from IP editors[edit]

I notice that your talk page has been receiving a deal of vandalism from IP editors (I suspect they are all one editor, using proxies). Note that if it persists, you might consider requesting temporary semi-protection of your talk page at WP:RFPP. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 15:23, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redistribution of Wealth article[edit]

I noticed you reverted changes I made to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redistribution_of_wealth and labeled them as vandalism. The few sentences I removed are statistics about public opinion on the topic and belong in a section about public opinion, not the opening section. Feel free to create a section for them, but do not put them in the opening section as they do not belong there. 69.117.163.51 (talk) 09:00, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Arundhati Roy has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Silivrenion (talk) 22:18, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to American imperialism. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Funandtrvl (talk) 22:33, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In your edit to the imperialism article, you added some old content Question: What sources make those claims which you added to the article in this edit: [1]? That was removed prior for lack of sources, and has since been removed. Please see WP:OR and WP:V on the necessity for having sources for claims, particularly for current writers/people.Ebanony (talk) 04:51, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This is my second warning to you. You restored WP:OR to the American imperialism article; such is a violation of policy and has been removed. Please do not do it again.Ebanony (talk) 00:47, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as sock of Mbhiii[edit]

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. Vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:04, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]