User talk:Vosotros32
Welcome[edit]
|
Discretionary sanctions alert[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Politrukki (talk) 13:49, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Laura Loomer[edit]
I've objected to your edit twice. Follow WP:BRD. You were bold, I reverted, now if you want to pursue this, discuss to gain WP:CONSENSUS for inclusion. WP:ONUS is on you. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:26, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 22[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andy Ogles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al Jazeera. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 24[edit]
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Candace Owens
- added a link pointing to Hollywood
- Jim Jordan
- added a link pointing to The Hill
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
[edit]
Introduction to contentious topics[edit]
You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
The page which you recently edited relating to this rule is Candace Owens. Burrobert (talk) 13:33, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 3[edit]
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Candace Owens
- added a link pointing to Variety
- History of antisemitism in the United States
- added a link pointing to Vanity Fair
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 10[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of antisemitism in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Hill.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 17[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of antisemitism in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wired.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
May 2024[edit]
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Heather Mac Donald. You can't source s**t like that to Mediamatters, some website called Angrywhitemen.com, and YouTube. Pinging CNMall41. Drmies (talk) 13:32, 5 May 2024 (UTC)