User talk:Vibigraphical

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 13:11, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Vibigraphical reported by User:FyzixFighter (Result: ). Thank you. FyzixFighter (talk) 04:10, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 18:40, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi, Daniel Case. It looks like I did in fact technically violate 3RR, and for that I'm sorry. I got caught up a bit, and lost track. My apologies. The point being though that the other editor in fact did revert four times also, in the space of a couple of hours, whether "consecutive" or not. Removing sourced relevant facts for obvious "I don't like reasons" and bias.

I pointed that fact out with actual evidence and points, not just asserting it. And that is a form of "edit-warring" also. Instead of maybe improving or modifying or fixing, he chose to completely remove. The information in the Mormon section of the article, which is true and referenced, and then the lede stuff which is relevant and arguably necessary, since it was lacking, and the rest of the article contains the point of "Life-giver and Law-giver to creation". The lede nowhere has that relevant article-mentioned information but pushes only hard trinitarianism right off the bat.

I didn't remove that part, but simply added the (arguably) necessary and the pertinent "Life-giver" etc stuff to make the lede a bit more complete, thorough, article-supported, and comprehensive. I meant no 'disruption' as others want to bad-faith impose on me or assume. But meant well. Thanks for your consideration to this matter though. In future operations or edits (if I do in fact edit anymore much after this) I will try hard to avoid this in the first place, and will be extra careful not to violate 3RR. Regards. Vibigraphical (talk) 19:59, 23 May 2023 (UTC)