User talk:Vestpa
I have reverted your edits to Vancouver because the citation you removed in not out of date (September 2006). Plus, there being no figure to compare to is an invalid reason to remove content cited by a reliable source. The Royal Bank of Canada is also more informative than Realitylink. -- Selmo (talk) 03:42, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- The main issue I had was you replacing the previous reference with a less credible source. Even so, I kept some of your relevent text but had to remove much of it due to problems using slang, sentence fragments and incorrect grammar. You can complain all you want to leave immature messages but when it comes down to it, your contributions reduced the quality of a featured article. Mkdwtalk 03:38, 23 November 2006 (UTC)