User talk:Vekoler/Archive: 22 Feb 2006 - 8 Mar 2006

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please, spare me the slander attempt[edit]

Saying that you hate Iranians is not a personal attack. It's a fact, plain and simple. And it can be verified by the several users who have complained to me about your anti-Iranian edits (all of them Iranian). Your hatred is so evident that even Iranian Kurdish users are against you on this.

Nice try.--Zereshk 02:12, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed it is unfortunate. I have Kurds in my family. My aunt is from Sanandaj. She is the sweetest. The level of anti-Iranian hatred you exhibit actually hurts many Kurds. Iran is their home.--Zereshk 02:37, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Respect the truth. It is okay to want a seperate Kurdistan, that is free will but by fabricating information and trying to re-write and create a false history with your Israeli allies is only victimizing the Kurds themselves. Kurds are an Iranian people and there was a time that the ancestors of the Kurds, the Mede were the most widely recognized people of Iran and people called all Iranians, including, Persians by the name Mede. You are helping rape Kurdish culture and truth and you are well aware of it. Have you no shame?

I am of some Kurdish background and have been raised with Kurds so please stop fabricating about Kurds. Especially, in Iran where they are treated better than anywhere else. Where they were always allowed to speak and write Kurdish or where there is Kurdish radio and broadcasting. Let me ask you where did Kurdish refugees originally go? Always Iran before Europe and Cyprus. You push false ideas like Kurds are not allowed to learn Kurdish in Iranian schools but you play with the truth. Kurdish is not funded as part of the public system, but there are Kurdish private schools. You never bring up the facts that Iranian Kurds are traditionall the most educated of the Kurds......you only spit propaganda!

So we both agree that Kurdish is not funded as part of the public Education system. Thanx.Heja Helweda 02:51, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You can add any info about the Gilaki articles you want. As long as mutually opposing sides are BOTH represented on any page, I have no problem at all. I'm not an ethnically driven bigot like you and your twisted friend. Go ahead and post any evidence. I'll post evidence as well. Let the reader decide in the end.--Zereshk 02:44, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't like personal attacks. In fact difference among people should be appreciated in order to promote tolerance. Gilakis may have a different tongue than Persians but that does not mean they can not live together in peace and harmony. Heja Helweda 02:51, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
What are you so enraged about?? I see your edits on and off Wikipedia. You have quite a hatred against Persia and Iran. A bigot by definition is someone who is "obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices". Im sorry, but that is exactly the behaviour you exhibit. Youre obsessed with trying to downgrade and debase Iran in every possible manner and article. What will you say next? That Achaemenids slaughtered Kurds? Or how about "Isfahanis speak another language and have been oppressed".
In case you havent noticed, your editing pattern is pretty obvious.
Celebrating differences is one thing. Promoting racial antipathy whilst separatist agendas is another.
Dont like the name bigot? Well tough. Then change your attitude. I have a list of 10 people that have complained to me about you.--Zereshk 03:08, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is the fourth time. About bigot [1], One who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ. Where is my intolerance?. I take that as a personal insult. Moreover, I don't hate anybody.Heja Helweda 03:13, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Every Iranian editor is insulted by your Iranophobia. Leave us alone!--Zereshk 04:18, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

YOU ARE MAKING FALSE INFORMATION UP & KURDS ARE ETHNIC IRANIANS[edit]

Respect the truth. It is okay to want a seperate Kurdistan, that is free will but by fabricating information and trying to re-write and create a false history with your Israeli allies is only victimizing the Kurds themselves. Kurds are an Iranian people and there was a time that the ancestors of the Kurds, the Mede were the most widely recognized people of Iran and people called all Iranians, including, Persians by the name Mede. You are helping rape Kurdish culture and truth and you are well aware of it. Have you no shame?

I am of some Kurdish background and have been raised with Kurds so please stop fabricating about Kurds. Especially, in Iran where they are treated better than anywhere else. Where they were always allowed to speak and write Kurdish or where there is Kurdish radio and broadcasting. Let me ask you where did Kurdish refugees originally go? Always Iran before Europe and Cyprus. You push false ideas like Kurds are not allowed to learn Kurdish in Iranian schools but you play with the truth. Kurdish is not funded as part of the public system, but there are Kurdish private schools. You never bring up the facts that Iranian Kurds are traditionall the most educated of the Kurds......you only spit propaganda!

Hi[edit]

have you read this? Diyako Talk + 20:02, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

Hi, I would appreciate if you take a look at the page of the Baloch. The article is one-sided and promotes pro-iranian perspective. Please if you have time take a look after that. I have explained the reason in the baloch talk page. Thank you very much. Diyako Talk + 17:02, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SHADDADID[edit]

BTW, you can see my page on shaddadid coins on :

http://www.forumancientcoins.com/armeniannumismatics/

and then here:

http://www.forumancientcoins.com/armeniannumismatics/shaddadids.html

Persian people[edit]

Thanks for your help in that article. I didn't want to be explicit and suggest that Persians are genetically mixed (I don't like talking about these stuff), but to somehow suggest that some unknown "Aryans" moved into Iran more than 2,500 years ago and that they have since remained isolated from the rest of the region is just historically, culturally, and linguistically absurd when you look at modern Persians. Regards, AucamanTalk 21:57, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Semitic-Turkic people[edit]

regarding the page Persian people (the Farsis) some people who are totally biased even remove valid and well-cited text from pages in the name of Vandalism. They are among the most racist people. It's against wikipedia policy. The modern Farsis are a semitic-Turkic people. We should prove this to the world.Mesopotamia 22:13, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Al-Khwarizmi[edit]

Hi Heja, I want to thank you for your info input to the Al-Khwarizmi article, regarding The Arab settlements in Khwarizm. Jidan 03:36, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

You have been reported to administrators --Kash 14:44, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

rojbas[edit]

thank you for the link. it is very interesting. have recieved my userbox for kurdisch wikpedians? another question. wher are you from and what exactly is the meaning of your nick name? see you KureCewlik81 22:28, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Hi[edit]

The ethnic group template which is wrongly used in the linguistic article of Iranian peoples is too odd. It is not needed and certainly should be removed. The template is only for ethnic groups like, Kurds, Armenians, Assyrians not Speakers of linguistic families. What's your idea? Thanks. Diyako Talk + 01:27, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

Do NOT add information before talking in the Iranian people's talk page. --Kash 01:58, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your research[edit]

I believe your research belongs to Kurdish people, please state how Semitic these people are, and very strangely speak Iranian languages which must have been forced to them among much of their Iranian-like culture, by the Iranians, thanks --Kash 02:35, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3rr Violation Warning[edit]

Please be forewarned that you are about to violate the 3rr policy in the Iranian people article, and perhaps elsewhere too.Zmmz 02:47, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Editing Privilages Warning[edit]

Hi, please know you have submitted numerous amount of writting in many, many discussion pages that relates to an article; Wikipedia is not a chatroom. Please know that according to Wikepedia`s policy, in good faith I have to warn you and any other user before I report them to an admin for violating any of the policies. Over-excessive writting in these discussion pages may be grounds for a temporary, or a permanent block. That would be up to the admin in question.Zmmz 01:27, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Arabs of Khuzestan[edit]

Since you helped add sources to the Khuzestan article, please see Talk:Arabs of Khuzestan. Those sources are being questioned by Zora (as usual). SouthernComfort 13:18, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Minorsky[edit]

Dear Heda,

Do you have book on Shaddadids by Minorsky? It is very good. Regards, (Hetoum 22:22, 6 March 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Youre very Welcome.--Zereshk 04:57, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Perry article on Bani Ka'b[edit]

Heja, do you have a copy of the 1971 Perry article on the Bani Ka'b? SouthernComfort is citing it, but he hasn't read it and neither have I. He says that either you or Zereshk introduced it as a reference. It's possibly out of date, but I'd like to see what it says. You could post the article on my talk page, or email me a PDF, whatever. Zora 08:44, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Roj bas[edit]

I am glad to see the effort you are doing to cover Kurdistan related issues on Wikipedia. However, there is still a lot of work to do. One urgent article to be written is about the Demokratik Toplum Hareketi, which still doesnt have an entry. Please dont let you be knocked down by the unpleasant nationalist remarks you get, and I hope you dont answer back in the same way. Oh, the reason I came to your place was because of a little confusion. On the article about the city of Wan, the city is also referred to as Tushba. is that zazaci or what?? Could you please have a look and sort it out. Bertilvidet 21:34, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]