User talk:Vandy 1989

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Vipinahir per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vipinahir. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. firefly ( t · c ) 16:20, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Firefly I can't understand for blocked me who was sockpuppet of User:Vipinahir per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vipinahir , taking as references for me Vandy 1989 (talk) 16:43, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure what you are asking - you were blocked because the evidence presented at the SPI was strong enough for me to think that this account is a sock puppet of the master listed there. If you wish to appeal, please read and follow this guide carefully. firefly ( t · c ) 16:48, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Firefly asking about who was Vipin , now I'm reading [[1]] here but not matched with my edit. you can reconsider and checked but you had done with suggestion of DaxServer

DaxServer targeted me from long time after that matched with other account and blocked was done by help of him. Vandy 1989 (talk) 17:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any evidence of you being "targeted". As I said, if you wish to appeal the block you will need to follow the instructions I linked. Thanks. firefly ( t · c ) 17:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Firefly for your confirmation each my edit was reverted by DaxServer then how can targeted on here. opposed him after that approx 10-15 days blocked me by your hand with help of him and also I don't know Vipin Ahir on Wikipedia. Vandy 1989 (talk) 17:07, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Firefly please unblock me, may be by mistake you blocked me. really I don't know anymore on Wikipedia. Vandy 1989 (talk) 17:11, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I stand by the block based on the evidence presented at the SPI and my assessment of it. As I have stated, if you wish to appeal the block, follow this guide. firefly ( t · c ) 17:12, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Firefly as your wish if you unblock me or not that's your choice Vandy 1989 (talk) 17:24, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Firefly: For you--

--Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:11, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #57734[edit]

is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:08, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra As per your review and remarks as [[2]], first edit was done by me on 17 April 2022‎ due to that's day saw in news/website and added the details here. for references you can see the same date here on image [[3]].

edit was done by me on 17 April 2022 with relevant sources so you can cross verify after that you can unblock
without can't edited any relevant sources past 10 months as joined here.
- As per some experience created Draft:Muslim-Yadav formula after watching approx 8 month out of 10, after that page was moved to draft and said that not having any relevant sources by user Hemantha but added so many sources.
asked from hemantha so many times to give the proper reason for moved the article but he was unable to said till date.
After that user DaxServer started the targeting on me but still I'm asking the same from Hemantha (May be both are known to each other)
I want to Know the valid reason from Hemantha like my mentor response [[4]]
If I have any doubt suddenly asked from mentor @Pelagic

I think you can understand my all concern as per my above comment. Vandy 1989 (talk) 19:53, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not ping me. Please read the the WP:GAB. You are blocked for sock puppetry per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vipinahir. Best --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:40, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra sorry of inconvenience actually ping for replied on (UTRS appeal #57734 ) status and remarks. Vandy 1989 (talk) 23:19, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below to the bottom of your talk page, filling in your reason:

{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Thanks --Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:25, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@NinjaRobotPirate loged the (UTRS appeal #57734) and after confirmation @Deepfriedokra to share the unblock reason after that shared. due to some edit related consider as sock id but its not me. so please consider my unblock reason and do the needful thanks~ Vandy 1989 (talk) 02:03, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replying here because I was pinged, though I see from below that Vandy can't reply back. I was AGF'ing that the political strategy of appealing to Muslim and Yadav voters could be a thing in Bihar, but I will defer to Vandamonde's argument Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics#Muslim- Yadav formula that there are many such strategies. Seems there is a history of certain users causing aggro and calling people M--C--. Though there are some re-reverts, I don't see egregious behaviour from the Vandy 1989 account itself. I'm not convinced that all pro-Yadav editors are necessarily socks, but this has progressed to the point where if Vandy really isn't the same person as Shital, he needs to explain the similarities presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vipinahir/Archive#23 April 2022. Vandy, sorry, it's not enough to assert that you're a different person and wrongly accused, you need to convince someone at UTRS why they should believe you. ⁓ Pelagic ( messages ) 14:54, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vandy 1989 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Insert your reason to be unblocked here Vandy 1989 (talk) 00:31, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The evidence is overwhelming that you're a sock puppet, and that's not even taking into the unrelated issues evident on this talk page. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:35, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Studied and read the guide of WP:GAB carefully and realized the I'm as a new user so give me one opportunity to share the my best knowledge on Wikipedia without blaming on anyone. I'll never give any chance for block in future. Past 10 months maximum studied about Wikipedia and read the content after that recently started to write my article here but may be as a newer I'll improve to myself to do the better for next edit or create the article. thanks Vandy 1989 (talk) 00:31, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop pinging administrators. Deepfriedoktra already asked you to stop. If you ping another administrator, I will revoke your talk page access. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:06, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra extremely sorry to ping and encrypt you , need some suggestion from your side as per your last replied after that provided the reason from myself to unblock me or will wait 48 hrs. for UTRS ticket, please guide me on this thanks in advance.... Vandy 1989 (talk) 14:54, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what you're up to. Repeatedly pinging DFO, who asked you to stop, is just plain trollish harassment by now. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:57, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vandy, when you @-mention someone, it generates a "ping". Above, NRP said don't do the ping, then on the very next line you did the ping and said sorry for doing the ping. Just mentioning this in case you genuinely don't understand the terminology. Because if you do understand it, then your action here seems downright contrarian. (I have no idea what "encrypt you" means in this context.) ⁓ Pelagic ( messages ) 15:13, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:57, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]