User talk:Unar64P

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Unar64P, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:30, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz Thanks Unar64P (talk) 14:30, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022–23 European windstorm season[edit]

Please do not change ‘last storm dissipated’ to Storm Dino or the last storm as the season is ongoing. You might update the ‘last storm dissipated’ after the season has ended. 115.96.141.18 (talk) 12:21, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@115.96.141.18 No, it the last disiped it Dino, the storm it disiped last. Unar64P (talk) 16:31, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022[edit]

Hello, Unar64P. I noticed that your recent edit to 2022–23 European windstorm season added a link to an image on an external website or on your computer, or to a file name that does not exist on Wikipedia's server. For technical and policy reasons it is not possible to use images from external sources on Wikipedia. Most images you find on the internet are copyrighted and cannot be used on Wikipedia, or their use is subject to certain restrictions. If the image meets Wikipedia's image use policy, consider uploading it to Wikipedia yourself or request that someone else upload it. See the image tutorial to learn about wiki syntax used for images. Thank you. Sumanuil. 00:45, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sumanuil Exist, for no Unar64P (talk) 12:55, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? Sumanuil. 18:34, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sumanuil i'am ortograpy Unar64P (talk) 21:49, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sumanuil it: track no Track 😂 Unar64P (talk) 21:49, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What? Sumanuil. 21:57, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sumanuil XD, i'am image it File:Danielle 2022 track no File:Danielle 2022 Track Unar64P (talk) 21:59, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, speak English! Sumanuil. 22:07, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sumanuil Ok Unar64P (talk) 22:00, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm TornadoLGS. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, San José de las Lajas, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. In any case, a minor EF0 usually isn't worth noting. On another note, you really need to pay attention to spelling, formatting, and grammar. TornadoLGS (talk) 23:08, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop this.[edit]

Hello! This is TheEasternEditer speaking. I have seen what you have done 2022–23 European windstorm season . If you don’t stop vandalizing, YOU WILL BE PROMPTLY BANNED. Sincerely TheEasternEditer. TheEasternEditer (talk) 01:34, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2022 San José Tornado and Thunderstorms for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2022 San José Tornado and Thunderstorms is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 San José Tornado and Thunderstorms until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TornadoLGS (talk) 19:54, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@TornadoLGS a Unar64P (talk) 20:19, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Hello! Unar64P, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:30, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 2022–23 European windstorm season, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 01:14, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cumulonimbus, you may be blocked from editing. Layah50♪ ( 話して～! ) 15:02, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did at Cumulonimbus. Layah50♪ ( 話して～! ) 15:04, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cumulonimbus. Roundish ⋆t c) 15:09, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Cumulonimbus. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. It has been repeatedly pointed out that the images which you are re-adding are malformatted. David Biddulph (talk) 15:22, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@David Biddulph https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cumulonimbus Unar64P (talk) 15:26, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why you've linked to that Spanish Wikipedia article? That doesn't have the malformatted images which you keep adding back into Cumulonimbus#Cloud_types. --David Biddulph (talk) 15:31, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022 Part 2[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 2022–23 European windstorm season, you may be blocked from editing. Cyclonetracker7586 (talk) 19:54, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022 Part 3[edit]

Hello, I'm Layah50. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2022–23 European windstorm season, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Layah50♪ (喋ってください!) 03:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Layah50 ok Unar64P (talk) 16:39, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Contributions[edit]

In certain edits, sometimes, please drop the stick. Thank you. Sarrail (talk) 01:51, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022 Part 4[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:CC3A (talk) 15:04, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:CC3A (talk) 15:12, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Block[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for disruptive editing. Two things: first, this is the English Wikipedia, what and how the Spanish Wikipedia does anything is not germane to the English Wikipedia's own ruleset. And secondly, because this is the English Wikipedia, sufficient command of the English language is not only expected, it is required (WP:CIR, WP:ENGAGE). That means you need to proofread what you say so that it is intelligible and coherent. So, please stop trying to brute force your changes across various pages through edit warring with that pretext, as it is invalid. And, please engage in discussion for any contested items. Thank you. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. El_C 18:16, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 21:42, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]