User talk:Todd82TA

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:ECARPUM2.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[1][2]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. -- Carlosguitar (talk) 17:09, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Omnivore[edit]

You and I are both fringing on the three revert rule, so please discuss on the omnivore talk page. The information you are changing is redundant of what is already in the article - that humans have the ability to digest meat. We don't have to go into details, especially using the teeth argument, which is not strong when pitted against the tooth-based arguments in favor of humans being herbivores. But if it's what I think you are saying, it's obvious that humans can use teeth to eat meat, and we shouldn't have to say that we have teeth. That's really irrelevant, as the info is redundant anyway. Again, please discuss on the talk page. Thanks. Okiefromokla's sockpuppet/talk 03:34, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, honestly, I don't know how to respond to you. (meaning, I have no idea what I'm supposed to click on so that it responds to you). I wasn't aware of any three revert rule, so I apologize. But thanks for changing it.