User talk:Tikmok

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello Tikmok, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Tikmok, good luck, and have fun.Aboutmovies (talk) 06:43, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Reticular formation, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Coronal and Medulla (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:35, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 4[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Depersonalization (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Stress, General population and Trauma
Lorazepam (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Refractory period

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:59, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 11[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Depersonalization, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Stress, General population and Trauma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:19, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thought disorder[edit]

Hello Tikmok - I've been going through the page and see that you have done quite a lot of work. There does seem to be many problems with defining and presentation on page. I've only just been looking at the Word Usage section and been made aware of just how much confusion there is. My initial thought was to change the page name to Formal thought disorder but ngrams favours thought disorder. Something is very amiss when the definitions used by APA are different from those used in DSM-5 and elsewhere. The later articles that I've been using from 2018 Lancet and a 2019 review are more relevant to Formal thought disorder perhaps an overview later after further edits. Best --Iztwoz (talk) 15:42, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi Iztwoz. Thkx for the heads up. It seems pretty clear from the psychiatric texts that this word isn't sharply or commonly defined; therefore, the article should present as such and makes it clear which one the section/paragraph is talking about. I personally prefer neither terms, but note that even if the article is changed to "formal thought disorder", this confusing situation still has to be presented somewhere else. Since the academics don't agree, I don't think all the wikipedians will agree either. Whichever way seems fine to me, as long as we present the confusion in an article, or in multiple related articles. Maybe a possible threshold for splitting into multiple articles is when the materials at hand shouldn't be all in one place. --Tikmok (talk) 05:31, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors![edit]

please help translate this message into your local language via meta
The 2019 Cure Award
In 2019 you were one of the top ~300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a thematic organization whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 18:35, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bitwarden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Core values.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]