User talk:ThinkBlue/Archive 12

Re: Birthday

Thank you very much! ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 00:16, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

LOL, no the drinking age here is 18. Unfortunately I only turned 17... ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 00:22, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Now that sucks! ;) No, I don't mind you asking. I've been the poor sod adding the table format to most of the PPV articles. Very, very tedious work! But someone's gotta do it, I suppose. After that, I'll probably finish off Mike Lockwood and get it to GA. How 'bout you? ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 00:29, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

I wasn't too keen on it at first either, but I really like it now. I much prefer it to the old format. ;) Yea, we should. We always say we're going to work on an article, and then we never do :( ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 02:03, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Definetly. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 02:06, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Sometime next week would be good. Give me a chance to finish off the tables... ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 02:11, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

I've replied to your e-mail. –LAX 02:17, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Yay!! Thank you! I appreciate the barnstar! I'll hit ya up once I finish the tables, and we can get to work! ;) ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 02:18, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Awesome! ;) ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 02:24, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Not at all. Again, as long as I can work on the Khali/Big Show vs. Taker feud. ;) –LAX 02:27, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

That's fine with me. I, actually, don't really care what I work on. As long as I get to help. ;) –LAX 02:38, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Woops, I forgot. =P D.M.N. (talk) 19:48, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Call me an idiot please.... gives self a slap round the head! D.M.N. (talk) 20:00, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

I do. Sort of. As for my PPV work, it's coming along good. =D D.M.N. (talk) 20:08, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Even more funnier is the King Mabel debacle, what a load of......... Thanks for the compliment, BTW, trying to make it sound "as fake as possible"!! =P D.M.N. (talk) 20:35, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

It's not a real song... I don't think (it's a redlink anyway). Wanna listen to it? Good singing! D.M.N. (talk) 20:56, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I was jokin'. Anyway, I've removed the italics. D.M.N. (talk) 21:04, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

OK. While I'm here, do you think I should have another paragraph on another undercard feud, or just leave the background at that. TBH, I'm not too sure. :S D.M.N. (talk) 21:10, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Drug Testing (The Office)

I think this is ready now, I have addressed your comments. RedThunder 23:52, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Survivor Series (2004)

Hey Blue, I saw that you nominate SS04 for GA, but the thing is, the results still need to be converted into table format. Good luck with the nomination, and Cheers! -- iMatthew _T.C. 00:58, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Also, 411mania.com was proven un-reliable, so I also suggest you replace the 411mania refs before the review, so that the article does not fail. Cheers, -- iMatthew _T.C. 01:02, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Hey.

I know I'm working on things right now, but is there anything you would like me to help you with. Anything at all. Cimmo (talk) 5:24 14 July (UTC)

Talk:West Midlands (Regional) League/GA1

Many thanks for the GAR, I have finally been able to get back online and have now responded, apologies for the tardiness! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:43, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Hey

Hey Blue, can you comment on SummerSlam (2003)'s peer review (link). Thanks. Also, for SS04, 411Mania is reliable per the comments made by User:Ealdgyth, they were made somewhere but I can't remember. Though, if they run by it again, there will be no problem.--S_RX 22:03, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks so much. --S_RX 22:19, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

I see what you mean, but if I combine them, it will have to many commas, and probably be too long/run-on.--S_RX 22:32, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

It really all depends on the reviewer. I wish GA Reviews were less complex, make them like WP:FA? Don't you?..lol--S_RX 22:37, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Oh, thanks (I think?..lol), but I was tempted to review 2006 Gator Bowl, but that thing was huge..lol When I review articles, I give suggestions, which makes it tough on me as well. I rarely review PW articles, but when I do, I know what to expect and what should be altered. I would review SS04, but didn't I kinda help with it? or not?--S_RX 22:51, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks so much, try not to be biased (I know you wont) ;).S_RX 23:07, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks again, and I replied to them. You think it has a chance at FA? (with all honesty)--S_RX 23:29, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, thats what I thought as well. I just don't understand why SS'07 failed? S_RX 00:13, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Does SS'03 have alot of that?S_RX 00:14, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Hopefully, it can pass FA. That's why it's good to write PPV's after FA and GA reviews, that way you can improve on what those lacked.S_RX 00:29, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Hey, when are you gonna start working on TGAB? ;) –LAX 00:38, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Alright. ;) So, could you find anything on the Batista/Kennedy "feud"? –LAX 00:45, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

You think it can surpass that? Yeah, it is, I told you above.S_RX 01:35, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

I mentioned it at WT:PW, and it is per this if you don't want to, use wrestleview/wrestling observer/pw torch/ or slam wrestling.

It makes sense to me. –LAX 01:50, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Nope, it was found reliable per the RFC of SummerSlam '07--S_RX 02:48, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Sure, I'll give it a go. –LAX 23:20, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

It looks good. But I think you should note that since a championship cannot be lost via count-out or DQ, Booker retained the title. –LAX 23:25, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

I just finished the Mysterio/Guerrero feud. How's it look? –LAX 00:57, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Period 1 element

Hey, I'd like to get Period 1 element to GA but I'm not quite sure how much I can expand it. I don't know how familiar you are with chemistry, but there isn't much to add to this article beyond the fact that the only elements in this period are hydrogen and helium. I guess I could sort of summarize the characteristics of the elements? Thoughts? :) Gary King (talk) 00:46, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Well I'm asking you as a fellow GA reviewer :) Also, I like to try challenges to expand articles that might seem hard to expand (like Cobb salad, which I only got so far.) Gary King (talk) 00:55, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Caesar would be too easy! Gary King (talk) 01:03, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Check Period 1 element out now. How about something like that? Gary King (talk) 01:04, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Haha, now that's getting more difficult. I believe that Food is generally the least popular subject to write about on Wikipedia. Gary King (talk) 01:11, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Article is done now. Nominated for GAN. Hopefully whoever reviews it thinks it has enough content because I don't know if I can add any more Gary King (talk) 03:49, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Haha, only if you've got time ;) I've got three noms up right now; so you can pick and choose :) With me, at least you're guaranteed a quick response! Gary King (talk) 03:56, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Ah, fair enough. WALL-E is awesome. Hancock is very disappointing :( Gary King (talk) 04:01, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

← Yep! I can't get away from Batman. Some people I know say that Batman looks too dark for them and so they might not watch it. For me, I want to watch it because it's dark! Gary King (talk) 03:09, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Sure thing; one at a time, though. I've already got an article at FAC right now :) Gary King (talk) 03:37, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Yeah sounds good. I've also got some GANs up if you're interested. Gary King (talk) 19:38, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

I'm currently working on improving List of Arcade Fire awards to WP:FLC but yeah I will get to it when I'm done. Gary King (talk) 19:43, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Alright that sounds good. Did you finally see the movie or are you just going to review it regardless? :) Gary King (talk) 19:46, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Speaking of midnight. TDK is out tonight at midnight (well, Friday/tomorrow at 12:00 am officially). However, I'll probably watch on Saturday :) Can't wait! Gary King (talk) 19:51, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Haha. I will be watching Batman Begins over and over again in the meantime :) Gary King (talk) 19:57, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Yeah I saw that a few days ago but I'm not a big fan of the anime/cartoon look :( Gary King (talk) 20:05, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

I don't know; of course, don't get me wrong, I like Batman – I'm a big fan of the whole grim, dark look thing because sometimes Spider-Man feels a bit too cartoony for me, but Batman Begins and TDK are going to be great because of the story, and Christopher Nolan as director. All of his films have been great so far – such as Memento. Gary King (talk) 20:09, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

← The major, major difference among great superhero films including Spider-Man, Iron Man, and Batman Begins is that the directors are not blockbuster film directors. So they focus more on the story than the special effects. Transformers is a huge blockbuster movie, with a blockbuster budget and director, so the plot sucks but the special effects are good. Gary King (talk) 20:17, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Saw TDK? Was it good? I have yet to see it. Big sigh! Gary King (talk) 17:21, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Wow you're really going to town with actor articles. Specifically TDK actors :) Gary King (talk) 18:26, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

You saw the same movie, four times in a row?! What?!?! Gary King (talk) 18:34, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

More of a fan than me apparently :( Anyways, I'm still going to buy the DVD, so I think I'm at least somewhat of a fan? :p Gary King (talk) 18:46, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Just FYI I've got 3 GANs right now (2 minus WALL-E). Gary King (talk) 18:47, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Alright. It still blows my mind that you saw it four times. Now I will walk around feeling like less of a fan! :( Gary King (talk) 18:51, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Baseball Newsletter

The Baseball WikiProject Newsletter Issue I – July 2008

"A home opener is always exciting, no matter if it's home or on the road." - Yogi Berra News and announcements Welcome to the first Baseball WikiProject Newsletter, dated Tuesday, July 15, 2008. The Article Improvement Drive has been revived. Check it out! The Outreach department is in the works, please contribute your ideas! Featured content In the past month, WikiProject Baseball has had the following articles promoted to Featured Article status: Art Houtteman 1926 World Series St. Louis Cardinals seasons Philadelphia Phillies seasons List of Major League Baseball players from Puerto Rico This month's newsletter was designed and written by Wizardman, jj137, and Blackngold29. If you would like to contribute to future newsletters, please contact the Baseball WP outreach dept.

News from the diamond The 79th MLB All-star Game is scheduled for this evening. The 2008 Home Run Derby took place yesterday. Justin Morneau defeated Josh Hamilton in the final round, 5 home runs to 3, although Hamilton broke a record with 28 home runs hit in the first round. From the Editors Baseball has a history unlike any other sport. It has been played in countless countries throughout the decades, and it will undoubtedly continue play for many more. On this eve, some the finest players the sport has to offer will take the field at the Yankee Stadium. Four popes spoke there, Pelé scored goals there, "The Greatest [football] Game Ever Played" was battled out there, John Philip Sousa lead a band there, George Costanza worked there; but what do all these events have in common? They fail to reach the level of greatness that the baseball that was played there did. In 1923, a man named Babe Ruth decided to build a new house, and over the years, that house was a home to some of the greatest baseball ever played. If I were to list out all of these great moments, it would be longer than the bill for the New Yankee Stadium. So I'll sum it up by saying that we can remember these great moments by adding them to this place we've gathered at for future generations to read about, to learn about, to dream about; but more importantly we can watch tonight and we can remember how baseball is unlike anything else that we will encounter in our lives. — Blackngold29

--  jj137 (talk) 03:21, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

RE: Michaels

Agreed. Nikki311 04:53, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Yes, it does. Quote:

The Black and White seemed complete after Kevin Nash announced the New World Order's latest recruitment at the June 3 Raw: the king of WWE "Attitude," Shawn Michaels! Sadly, Shawn revealed a bitter disposition the following week in Atlanta's Phillip Arena, reaffirming his June 1 WWE Confidential comments that "The Heartbreat Kid" was dead. Michaels explained how he'd literally broken his back for the WWE, only for fans to steer the company's "promotional machine" from HBK over to "3:16" at WrestleMania XIV. "As Vince McMahon always said, 'It's you, the fans, who determine where we go as an organization.' So it was you, the fans, who dumped me for Stone Cold Steve Austin like a cheap nickel-and-dime prostitute runs to a millionaire!" Michaels called Nash, Booker T, X-Pac and Big Show out to the ring to address a similar problem which existed within the nWo...then superkicked the Book with some Sweet Chin Music! Accusing the floored Booker of upstaging the Black and White like Austin had done to him, Michaels swore, "Nobody wil ever steal the spotlight of the nWo again!"

Cite it to:<ref>{{cite book|first=Michael|last=McAvennie| title=WWE The Yearbook: 2003 Edition|publisher=WWE Books|year=2003|month=April|isbn=0-7434-6373-0|pages=pp. 140–141|quote=INSERT ABOVE QUOTE OR MINI PORTION OF IT HERE!!}}</ref>

I hope this is OK. =D D.M.N. (talk) 07:43, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Yes. Is there any events in particular you were looking for (for instance when HHH/HBK reunited as DX. If you could provide particular bits in their feud for which you want references for it would help. Thanks, D.M.N. (talk) 14:59, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Yes it does. The book is 300+ pages long, and covers virtually every feud, no matter how small on RAW or SD!. There are a lot of pages on that feud, hence why I need to know what part of the feud you need referencing. Sorry if I sound like a dick. D.M.N. (talk) 15:07, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Page 314. Sorry if I sounded like an idiot before, but the book is 350+ pages, has detailed PPV reviews, and covers every feud in prose month by month. If you wish, I could go onto the HBK article, and replace the refs for 2002 myself? =D D.M.N. (talk) 15:13, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

I've done it now. D.M.N. (talk) 15:23, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Nope, sorry. D.M.N. (talk) 15:35, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

I'd use this for the TBN thingy. D.M.N. (talk) 16:37, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

I typed in "Shawn Michaels TBN" on Google, and there it was second one down. =D D.M.N. (talk) 16:41, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

The Wrestling Information Archive sources are there to cite PWI Awards, correct? Now, according to the Pro Wrestling Illustrated article: "A special PWI Awards magazine is put out annually, which shows not only the winners, but the first three runners-up with the number of votes. The wrestlers receive plaques for each PWI Award that they win." - so therefore why not just cite straight from the magazine as a whole? That should be OK, even if the ref lacks key details e.g. barcode number etc. So for instance with his 1995 awards cite the 1995 magazine etc.. D.M.N. (talk) 16:49, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

It seems alright. D.M.N. (talk) 18:16, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

How does TGAB '04 look so far? –LAX 19:46, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Good idea! And then maybe we can get WWE The Great American Bash to be a featured topic. –LAX 20:08, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Just cite the magazine itself for the PWI awards, if you can figure out which issue it is (which I don't think would be too terribly difficult). Nikki311 22:17, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Congrats with Unforgiven. Hey how does SummerSlam (2003) look now? (The BG and the event Up to the U.S title match).--S_RX 00:10, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Re:WON awards

I believe the consensus was that they are, but I'm unsure to what degree. Check the WT:PW archives. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 03:01, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Backlash

Thanks for GA Reviewing the article, Matt got to your concerns before I was able to do so, so I think he covered everything. --S_RX 00:00, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

I've sent you an e-mail. –LAX 00:06, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Sure. The more help the better. ;) –LAX 00:14, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Yep, sure did. –LAX 00:18, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

I will try to get to SS'04 later tonight. Sure, I will get to it later as well, promise. Thanks for the GA review.--S_RX 00:26, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Great. We should have this done in no time. ;) BTW, how does TGAB '04 look now? –LAX 00:32, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

If they are both of that person alone, they I'd say yeah. I wouldn't recommend it. However, if one is of only that person and the other is of them in a match (or something of that nature), the I'd say there's nothing wrong with that. You get what I'm trying to say? –LAX 00:54, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

I would put an image of Cena in the background, and an image of Orton as WWE Champion in the aftermath. –LAX 00:57, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Wait, which article do you want me to review? Survivor Series 04 has been reviewed.S_RX 01:04, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

I don't know if I can do that, since I am the nominator of the article.S_RX 01:06, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

And you can't review it since you are the major contributor. Wow, thats cheating.lol You just nominated it. But what the hell, why not?..lolS_RX 01:08, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

I'd say no. It's looks a little too odd to me. Also, per WP:MOS#Images, change the image of Orton to one of him facing the left. –LAX 01:10, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Unforgiven (2007) is currently  On hold. Comments can be found here (Sorry, thats my "automated" GA review message lol, and sorry for being such a dick with the review.)--S_RX 03:11, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

It looks good, just a few prose issues, do you want me to point them out here or are going to 'put it up for PR. I guess you haven't been paying attention to WT:PW, their is new consensus formed on how to write out of universe, which is what me and LAX are doing for SummerSlam (2003) and SummerSlam (2007), check out WT:PW for more on it and you will see why the many differences are there ;)S_RX 00:43, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Sure I'll point them out later on. The new consensus is so the articles can pass FAC, which was prevented with the jargon and in-universe style of writing, now I think we may have 2 FACs.S_RX 00:47, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

1968 Liberty Bowl GAR

I prefer not to use the cite web template. It's just personal preference, not out of being stubborn or anything. It's been held up as all right (use of cite web is encouraged but not required) in featured Article Review, but if there's any other problems you'd like me to change, don't hesitate to ask! Thanks again. JKBrooks85 (talk) 03:27, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Hancock

You set an article as GA, and it had no introduction (article started with a header). I fixed that, but you might want to take note of glaring issues like that in the future. MSJapan (talk) 04:34, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

The Dark Knight (film)

I'm back from it. It is truly epic, and well-deserving of its #1 spot on IMDB's all-time list. The Dark Knight (film) and related articles will be getting lots of loving. Gary King (talk) 22:17, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

SERIOUSLY?! Lucky you :| Although, honestly, I think that sometimes too much of a good thing is not good ;) Just like, as it has been discussed in numerous reviews, if there was more screen time for the Joker than there is now, then the movie wouldn't be as good. As it is now, you are dying to know when the next time the Joker appears on screen while watching the movie! It's intense. Gary King (talk) 22:46, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Don't even speak to me about any Batman films not directed by Nolan :p Also, didn't get to see it in IMAX unfortunately. Even though I'm from the same city that the company is based in ( ;) ), I don't think there's one near me. Gary King (talk) 23:01, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Still working on BB. Gotta give it and now TDK some TLC. What's the IMAX experience like? The screen wraps around the audience? I've only been to an IMAX screen at the nearby science center so that's the only time I got to experience it, for Mount Everest films and such. Gary King (talk) 23:19, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

I have decided that I will watch The Dark Knight in IMAX. It will probably be in a few weeks, though, as I've already seen it so there isn't as much point to see it again so soon. Also, I just purchased the movie's soundtrack, and two posters: this one and this one. Gary King (talk) 19:22, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Nice. A lot of people I know are creeped out by the Joker, but personally, I like the complexity of the character. He's so evil, but of course he's not an idiot and he knows how to get things done. He's just so interesting! Gary King (talk) 19:36, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Haha, are you trying to persuade me to work on his article? In due time! Some people I know wasn't going to watch the movie because they were unsure of how dark it would be; I eventually convinced them to go see it and they definitely walked away happy that they saw it. Also, a lot of the people that watch Mamma Mia aren't the same people that would watch TDK so they are both mutually exclusive in a way, which is why TDK managed to get $155 million while Mamma Mia still managed to get a decent $27 million on the weekend. Space Chimps is such a joke. It got $7 million on its first opening weekend! They should have released that movie before WALL-E because WALL-E just pummels any animation movie that isn't up to par with it. Gary King (talk) 19:49, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I guess my fears were for nothing when I was worried at whether or not the movie would become more successful than BB, eh? Also, I did take a look at the Joker article after returning home from the movies but it does indeed look a bit complicated at this point. I think the hardest part will be finding references. However, would you like to collaborate on it? Gary King (talk) 20:01, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

FYI the article is certainly getting way more love after the movie was released. Gary King (talk) 20:03, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

← Okay I will get to it soon, as in a week or two. Also, I don't really know where I can access comic books for references. There are probably some good regular books that I could get from the library that analyze the comics, too, since in the past few years comic books have become more serious. Gary King (talk) 20:11, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Wow, it's in really poor shape right now; it needs a Development section at the very least :) I've never played the game, too, so maybe I'll get to it later. Gary King (talk) 20:29, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Development sections are the hardest to build, and since the article doesn't have one yet, I'm wary as to how long it would take to get the article up to scratch :) Gary King (talk) 20:36, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Most of your articles are biographies and events; I think you should branch out more :) Gary King (talk) 20:43, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Joker, or the video game, for starters. Work on either one but don't give up this time :p Gary King (talk) 21:01, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Feedback

Hey Blue, how've you been? Anyway, I gave two comments on Unforgiven 03's talk page, and I'll give some more later. Cheers, -- iMatthew _T.C. 00:44, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

I guess let Matt do it, then I'll point out anything that he misses.--S_RX 00:54, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

I'm doing great, and I'm actually really excited about going to the bash tomorrow! Yeah, I'm working on Bash '05. TGAB, a FT...sounds great! No problem for the Unforgiven review, btw. Cheers, -- iMatthew _T.C. 00:56, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Did you get my reply? –LAX 00:59, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. Of course we can. 3 heads is better than 2 (wow that was corny.lol)--S_RX 01:01, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

That would be cool. SRX, that was pretty corny, ;) -- iMatthew _T.C. 01:03, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Hmm... IDK. Shawn Michaels' article? –LAX 01:12, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Ah, Unforgiven (2003). Wasn't that already done, though? –LAX 01:19, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Review

Thank you for the original GA review of hot chocolate. I would appreciate it if you could take a look at the changes I have made to the article based on your suggestions at Talk:Hot chocolate/GA2. Thanks again! Malinaccier (talk) 01:25, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 16:22, 20 July 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

How you sign your name..

I notice you and a lot of your wikifriends sign your names very colorful. Do you just code it yourself and have to paste it every time or is their a way that you can edit how ~~~~ shows up? Thanks. Mwutz (talk) 03:22, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, as you can see, worked! --Mwutz 20:04, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Hard Ball GAN

I've sorted all the problems you brought up at Talk:Hard Ball. -- Jamie jca (talk) 19:15, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: Question

Somewhat. Why? Gary King (talk) 00:11, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

It can easily get to GA in its current state. Gary King (talk) 00:47, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

I mean, get to GA, like with a little bit of work get to a Good article state. Gary King (talk) 01:06, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

I'm not a huge Superman fan; this is the only Superman film I have seen, so I think I will pass. But, the article already has a lot of meat, it just needs references now. Gary King (talk) 01:13, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

I've got a few WP:FLC and WP:GAN listed which I am waiting to be closed before starting on anything new. If you've got time, feel free to comment on them ;) Gary King (talk) 01:22, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Ah, I'm finally going to watch TDK tomorrow in IMAX. I didn't realize that IMAX was so popular (since it cost more, etc.) – the showings are already sold out, so the latest I can go is 12:00 p.m.! Gary King (talk) 00:25, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Homer's Odyssey

Hi. I have fixed the two things you mentioned in the above article's GAN. Thank you for taking the time to review it.--LAAFan 04:12, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

LAAFan has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thanks for taking the time to review it. :)--LAAFan 02:29, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

WikiCup

weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 10:36, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Hurricane Ivo (2007)/GA1

I think I addressed your comments. Cheers, Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 02:34, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

And again with Talk:Tropical Storm Barry (2002)/GA1. :) Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 01:29, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Alan Shearer GA

Hello! Thanks for taking a look at the article, to be honest I wasn't expecting to hear anything for a few weeks. I've looked at all of the points on the talk page, and I think I've remedied all of them. I've gone into more detail on the page, thanks! - Toon⁰⁵ 21:12, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Excellent, my first truly meaningful contribution to Wikipedia! Hopefully the first of many. Thanks for the review. And whoever said Americans don't know anything about football? ;) - Toon⁰⁵ 21:37, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

I will keep that in mind, thanks! - Toon⁰⁵ 21:43, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: IMAX

Oh yeah? Not that surprising, I guess. Oh, and I went online to check the address for the movie theater, I check the showtimes – 12:00 pm is available, but after that, it's all sold out. I post that message to you, go out for five minutes, come back and refresh the page – and even 12:00 pm is sold out tomorrow! It sold out while I was gone for a few minutes. So now I'm going to buy Sunday at 12:00 pm since that's the same deal – everything after 12:00 pm is gone. Gary King (talk) 00:32, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Yeah would be nice if it was reviewed :) Gary King (talk) 00:44, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Alright I just bought the tickets. It's 50% more than normal ones, so it better be worth it! Also, it said to print the tickets on one per page, so I just copy and pasted each one onto a different Microsoft Word document. I hope I did it correctly! Gary King (talk) 00:54, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

It says to print the tickets one per page; the problem is that they come right after the other on the printing page, so I suppose we have to be creative to print them. How do I get into the theater? Don't they just scan the barcode on the ticket – I imagine that's the most crucial part of the ticket? Gary King (talk) 01:06, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Except that I've never purchased movie tickets online before! Gary King (talk) 01:12, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Nope don't think it's the same then. It says to bring my printed ticket directly to the usher instead of waiting in the ticket-purchasing line. Gary King (talk) 01:21, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Ah, well as I said, I print out the ticket and it has a barcode on it so I guess they scan the barcode on the printed ticket. It sounds like you don't need to go online at all? I don't really get how they could reserve a ticket for you with only your name, since then you wouldn't have paid for the ticket yet, etc. Gary King (talk) 01:34, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Hm the problem with that is that it sounds like it can be abused though. Gary King (talk) 01:41, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

So do you have to go to the theater to get the ticket at a prespecified time or something? Otherwise someone can reserve a hundred tickets under different names, and then not arrive at the theater so they don't have to pay for the tickets. This would cause the theater to hold a hundred tickets for someone who will never show up, so then they can't sell them to someone else. Gary King (talk) 02:18, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

← I saw TDK in IMAX today – the first time I've ever viewed IMAX. Loved it! Gary King (talk) 03:28, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

RE:Busy

Nothing other than reviewing GA articles and still finishing up SummerSlam (2003), why?--S_RX 02:36, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Sure. I'll get to it tomorrow. Also, sorry about not finishing the event section for The Bash '06. I'll get to that tomorrow as well.--S_RX 02:41, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Ok thanks. Which matches though do you want me to complete?--S_RX 02:51, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Ok I'm done. Sorry I took so long.--S_RX 15:08, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Your welcome. Well I'm done, I just need the PR to close. You think it should go straight to FAC like it is or GA first?S_RX 23:55, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

I think i will get shot down by PW. Go to WT:PW and scroll to the bottom and see the big discussion about the new PPV formats. I say not yet, because we don't know if that is a way to write articles to meet the FA criteria. I think I'm gonna go for it to see what happens and if it doesn't pan out, we may know what to improve in.S_RX 00:14, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

I gave notice to WT:PW. lol, yeah you are going to have to wait for us. :p Sure, but what article?S_RX 00:22, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Sure. When do you want to start? Crap, 2008 WWE Draft failed its FLC.S_RX 00:26, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Sure. What do you want me to work on? There were no votes, which is why it failed. Eh >;(S_RX 00:34, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

I asked the FL director if I could nominate again, but I'm still waiting for a response. Sure. I'll try, since I never played that game.--S_RX 00:41, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Well about 3 people reviewed it but they did not place a "support" or "oppose", so it was just not promoted by The Rambling Man, the FL director. I will start to work on it.--S_RX 00:49, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. You know not to be a dick or anything, but I don't think I can write the gameplay for Batman Begins because I am so unfamiliar with the subject. I'm sorry, mayby if it were something I was familiar with I could have written it, like a racing game or a fighting game. Sorry. :(--S_RX 01:07, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry. Mayby a VG about pro wrestling, racing, or another fighting game. Want to just work on a pro wrestling article or a list of any nature?S_RX 01:15, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

IDK, writing that game would be like writing WWE SmackDown (video game series) all over again. How about a list of some sort?S_RX 02:29, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

A building's list or a video game list?S_RX 02:34, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

How about making a List of Need for Speed titles?S_RX 02:41, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Superman Returns

Would you like to collaborate to get SR to GA status? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:21, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Sure! I'll have some time this week to make some passes at it. Replying on your page too. I'd been meaning to for a while... rootology (T) 15:11, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry but I was busy in real life today and had no time to get on the computer. Can I complete it tomorrow?--S_RX 02:17, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Manchester Part I and Part II

Thanks for you review of my article! I've tried to address your query, could you please have another look? Lampman (talk) 16:06, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! Lampman (talk) 15:30, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

CM Punk

I don't know where to go with this but, on CM Punk's page, don't you think instead of

Raw brand (2008–present)

it should be

Pursuit of the WWE Championship (2008-present)?? RkOrToN 19:17, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

My mistake, I meant World Heavyweight Champion...? RkOrToN 00:00, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

I'll be staying this time ;) RkOrToN 00:10, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Feels great to be back, and don't worry you will ;). Although, I might not be so much on the wrestling related articles as I tend to remember how to do everything on Wiki. RkOrToN 00:15, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

(Video game articles) I'm great with them :) RkOrToN 00:19, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Kinda, but like I said just trying to remember every thing :) And thats good, atleast am not alone here lol. RkOrToN 00:22, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Sure. Want to start now or...? RkOrToN 00:25, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

I don't know what the hell I said lol, your my pal as well. And sure I don't mind. RkOrToN 00:29, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

I don't have the game to be honest, but I know my sources, so I'll read alittle bout it, and start expanding. RkOrToN 00:32, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Oh lol. RkOrToN 00:33, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

That'll be good. I might work on the Gameplay or Story, idk. Though, Ill start reading 'bout it now and i'll hit you up in 5. RkOrToN 00:37, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Well, I read a couple of reviews, the plot and story of the game. I think I'm ready. RkOrToN 00:51, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

I've replied. –LAX 00:53, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Sounds Good. I'll also start fixing mistakes, and sourcing everything out. RkOrToN 00:58, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Cool. RkOrToN 01:06, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Just a couple of reviews, trying to get the idea of the game. And, criticized? RkOrToN 01:14, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

I know what you mean lol. If you don't mind am also working on the Cast section, adding notes to the characters. I already did Batman. (Got the idea from Iron Man (video game)) RkOrToN 01:27, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Cool. RkOrToN 01:37, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Sorry I got to go, big wedding party (Yea this freakin late lol). Ill be on tommoro afternoon, and Ill finish up extending the Cast section. Se ya later Sis. RkOrToN 01:40, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Yep, and I replied. –LAX 01:54, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Yummy!

Tiptoety has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. {{subst:if||| {{{message}}} ||subst=subst:}} To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Halo GA review

I fixed your comments for Talk:Halo: The Flood/GA1, on David's behalf. Thanks. Blackngold29 16:29, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

I hope you are aware that I responded about the VG list above?..:)..lol--S_RX 16:58, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Now? It's pretty easy to make these types of lists, we can have it done by today. Want to work on the lead? I will work on the tables. Try to follow the model of WWE SmackDown (video game series). Since we can finish it today: sandbox or mainspace?--S_RX 17:03, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Lets do it in mines. Try to make the lead with good facts so maybe we can get a DYK.--S_RX 17:15, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Haha. Well lets get too work.?--S_RX 17:25, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Both are correct. It took 2 years to develop the first game.--S_RX 18:27, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

I would say from 1994, because that's when it was literally produced, unless you want to say it was developed from 1992.--S_RX 18:39, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Expert? Ha. But to coincide with other VG FL's, it should read "The main series was produced from 1994-2002." If you want you can later say that the first game was developed in 1992, but I dont think that's needed.S_RX 18:48, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

I reworded it a bit. But it looks good. Keep it up!--S_RX 19:02, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Cool. Try to research whether it is the longest running racing game series to date, I think it is. That way, that fact can be our DYK. How does our table look?S_RX 19:21, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

I don't know if it is. But try to search it on google and see whether it is. IT should be added as that could be a DYK fact.S_RX 19:32, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Are we still working on TGAB '06, or what? --LAX 00:06, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

No it doesn't. But I think it is the longest running franchise. Search google with keyterms like need for speed + longest running.S_RX 02:42, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Aaron Eckhart GA review

Just dropping by to let you know I've filled out a review for Aaron Eckhart. Good luck with improving the article! —97198 talk 09:10, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Hurricane Henriette (2007)/GA1

Just wanted to let you know that all the issues have been addressed. Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 14:44, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

So are we still working on TGAB or not? --LAX 01:51, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

I'd be delighted. For some reason or another, that is now my favorite section to write. I'll have to start over from scratch, though. 'Cause that's how I roll. :P --LAX 01:58, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

I know, but I just had to say it. ;) I don't think they really "hurt" the article, although they could go for all I care. I see that you have already written it. Do you want me to write an aftermath for it, though? --LAX 02:09, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

I'll do what I can. I've been quite busy lately, so I may not get to it right away. --LAX 02:22, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Anyways, you haven't replied to my latest "text". --LAX 02:31, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

110% sure. Either you didn't get it or I didn't get your reply. --LAX 02:36, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Yep. I got it now. --LAX 02:46, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Laie Hawaii Temple GA Nom

I'm going to take over your reviewing for the Laie Hawaii Temple GA nomination, if you don't mind. I hope I'm not being rude. :D Intothewoods29 (talk) 04:40, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Want to try and finish the list today? I responded above about the comment you left me on my talk page.--S_RX 14:43, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

I researched here on wiki, and the only other racing series released before NFS was Virtua Racing, but they stopped releasing in 1996. So NFS is the longest consecutive racing series. I just don't know how we can source it. --S_RX 14:56, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

They have nothing. I guess we can't add that, oh well. Just continue doing the rest of the lead.--S_RX 15:04, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Oh btw how does the lead for SummerSlam (2003) look?S_RX 15:10, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Okay never mind! I didn't know there was a peer review, but I thought there was a reason. Thanks Intothewoods29 (talk) 15:29, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Thank you so much, and I'm pretty sure I could help you do that with your PPV. Wow, Vengeance reads awkwardly since I've been writing out of universe, but in universe it reads great. You just want to cut down on the background and no go into much detail, which is why I cut down on the BG for SS' 03. Just summarize the main points. Also, try to avoid using a lot of jargon, it's okay, but writing the whole thing like that is getting GA Reviewers fed up. :)S_RX 15:31, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

First let's see if it's worth writing it like I did for SS'o3, if it passes FAC, then that will be the new model to follow. But if you look at the Peer review for SS'03, look at what the FA reviewers have told me about it.S_RX 16:28, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

I will email you how I did the grossing for the event. Motor City was part of NFS, it was just intended as as spinoff to the series, but EA just put the NFS name on it.S_RX 17:02, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

That actually is kinda true. Then you can say how it evolved into different systems.S_RX 17:10, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Great. Can you publish the lead in my sandbox where the rest of the list is at? Sure. I think it's a good list, but how many games have been produced under that name?S_RX 22:17, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Sure I don't mind. I can finish up the lead. You think we can be done by tonight? Sure we can work on it after we are done with NFS. What's you email, I don't have the link.S_RX 22:48, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Okay cool. I see no link?--S_RX 23:31, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Yep, it is. Mobygames and Game Rankings.S_RX 00:11, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

For the release dates, you should use GameSpot because it also gives you for Japan.S_RX 00:14, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Talk:History of the National Hockey League (1942–1967)/GA1

I happened to be checking my watchlist just as you posted your review. I (hope) I have already addressed your concerns, heh. Regards, Resolute 21:45, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Okay I'm done the lead, and I think I found our DYK fact, the one about the customization of vehicles. Also, in one of the games that you wrote, you put GameCube twice, can't recall at the moment which one.--S_RX 01:29, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

I'm done. Just 3 more (I think) and you will be done.--S_RX 01:49, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Also, when you do the releases, do them in ABC order like I did. :) Are you sure you are going to finish it by today, so I can upload the generic NFS logo to put in the article?--S_RX 02:26, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Wow don't I feel smart. Ok I'll move it into the mainspace, get a copyedit by Nikki, upload the image, and nominate it for DYK.--S_RX 02:32, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Well, I'm done. check it out, image uploaded, currently request a CE by Nikki and I am about to nominate it for DYK.S_RX 02:46, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

After the copyedit, I will nominate it for FLC. If you are online after Nikkie copyedits it and I'm not, go ahead and co-nominate it w/ me to FLC.--S_RX 02:53, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films July 2008 Newsletter

The July 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:45, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Do you?

Do you have a yahoo, because I just want to talk to you so I hope we can get along. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 2:10, 1 August (UTC)

Jack the Bulldog

Just wanted to pop over and thank you for taking the time and reviewing the page!--Patrick Ѻ 02:27, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Oh my bad. I already nominated it here. I think however, we will not get a DYK because I messed up on the hook of the DYK and it was too long and then i made an alternate, but it was not approved, sorry. Also, next time you want to nominate a FLC, put the FLC template in the talk page and follow the link given there, then put a lever 3 header with the articles names wikilinked and then explain why you are nominating it.--S_RX 03:00, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Well we had plans for List of NFL Madden titles no? Also, when expanding this, MobyGames is not reliable per WP:VG/S.--S_RX 03:10, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Don't worry I already replaced them earlier today for NFS. A FT? Sure, but what would be the topic?--S_RX 03:18, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Hmmm, how many are them are GA's? Then we would have to get Cyber Sunday to FLC.--S_RX 03:25, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

"up and stuff?"..lol I sent you an email.--S_RX 03:36, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Idk, I don't feel like working on PPV's, SS'03 has got me so fed up and like stressed. How about the Madden list? or a List of tallest buildings, you can pretty much get yourself a DYK out of those.--S_RX 14:54, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

I responded to your email and I nominated SS'03 for FA status. OMG, I hope it does good. :)S_RX 01:38, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

I don' think we need the email anymore :P. Hopefully, watchlist it!! Eh, NFS has no comments whatsoever. You want to help me with a buildings list?--S_RX 01:52, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

May I recommend a new computer?..lol What's wrong with it?--S_RX 02:00, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Well me and Raime are trying to get List of tallest structures in Paris back to FL status. But we haven't started, we have to convert the table into one used in List of tallest buildings in Baltimore. Then we have to source the buildings with refs, which is relatively the easy part. I also recommend (if you haven't so) go to your preferences then click gadgets and add RefTool, it will add a cite button to the toolbox and then you can source pages by just filling out the application.--S_RX 02:29, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

I will notify you when we can start. So you didn't use if for NFS?--S_RX 02:43, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Not really, why? I will keep you in the loop :)S_RX 03:01, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Oh okay, cool.S_RX 03:54, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Association for the Study of Ethnicity and Nationalism

This is just a quick note to say that I've made the changes you requested in your GA review of Association for the Study of Ethnicity and Nationalism. Thanks again for taking a look at it! – SJL 04:53, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Barely Legal (Family Guy)/GA1

Further input has been received after I requested it over IRC. Qst (talk) 19:36, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Owch

I didn't realize that I had not added you on my userpage under "other users of references" and then I noticed I was removed from your page. I just wanted you to know that was a mistake, and completely unintentional. I'll re-add you now. Cheers, -- iMatthew _T.C. 11:06, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 15:18, 3 August 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Sorry

I don't have internet for a few more weeks, right now am at the libary, sorry Blue, I guess you might have to work by yourself for a few more weeks, sorry sis. RkOrToN 23:33, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Beth Hamedrash Hagadol GA

Thanks for your thorough review. I've updated the article based on your comments. Jayjg ^(talk) 00:41, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks again. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:43, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Film/Movie Locations FamousLocaions.com

Hi ThinkBlue, I run a website FamousLocations.com and we list 233,000 movies and 4,600,000 locations around the world. We list movie locations for the movies. We are a free site and offer great movie/film location info and are interested to get listed on the movie pages at Wikipedia for the pages. We have been running since 2001. What do you think? Thanks David —Preceding unsigned comment added by FamousLocations-com (talk • contribs) 13:17, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

I've set up wider discussion here. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 13:28, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

You want to get a DYK?--S_RX 14:39, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Lets created the Building Height Act of 1910, that is for sure to give us a DYK.--S_RX 14:41, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

This isn't relatively a buildings list, but a amendment passed by The U.S government. Try to find a good article or featured article or B-class article about an amendment so we can use it as a template.--S_RX 14:44, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Well I meant find an article on Wiki, but I guess we can just do the best we can on our own. Apparently not per SummerSlam's FAC. Ok want to create it in the main space or sandbox?S_RX 14:47, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

If we do the actual article we are going to have to create in less than 5 days. For HBK? That sucks.S_RX 14:55, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Try using PW Torch to source it. Okay in my sandbox then.S_RX 15:04, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Why you say that? Umm, I'll start the lead and you can start the sections.S_RX 15:22, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Okay cool. --S_RX 15:35, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Okay I think I'm done the lead. How does it looK?--S_RX 16:09, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

I don't think there is a well written one, but if you look at List of United States Legislatures, that is all the acts passed by congress, try looking at those. Also, this source gives the 3 main sections (I dont know if that is all the sections) and gives the exceptions to the law. That file is in PDF format. I'm still searching for all sections.S_RX 16:20, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

The wikilink above gives all the acts passed in US History just try to search for a good one and use it as a template.--S_RX 16:26, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm just not sure if we are suppose to list all the sections or just the main section. I will create a section that gives examples of building restrictions.S_RX 16:34, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Yeah it works, but from that source I gave you you should write the 3 parts of section 5.S_RX 18:04, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Sorry the wikilink I gave you above was not correct, this is the correct on -->List of United States federal legislationS_RX 18:12, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Just copy and paste it but with italics or a quote template with a source, as that is the main act's points.--S_RX 18:19, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

I just got done with my latest pay-per-view, and should have some time now to rewrite the event section for GAB '06 (and write the aftermath in the lead for TT '04). --LAX 01:27, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

I am now obsessed with writing PPVs on my own. I am ten-times better and I get them done so much quicker. Anyways, I'll have the Bash done tomorrow for sure. As for TT, I may have it done tomorrow, I may not. :P --LAX 00:59, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

It should be no problem, It really doesn't take me that long. --LAX 01:07, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Oh yeah, I published Heights of Buildings Act of 1910 and for DYK, let's see if we get a DYK out of it.S_RX 01:27, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Well kinda, but you found me the source and wrote some of section 5, so it's okay we both contributed.S_RX 01:31, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

It's cool. :)S_RX 01:36, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

It's okay, no votes of support of opposal but comments for fixes.S_RX 01:46, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

You can do that (but only when the name appears once) or you can explain somewhere in the article that pro wrestlers use ring names.--S_RX 01:52, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

No problem :)S_RX 02:06, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Deleting old username

Hi ThinkBlue, I was wondering if I could change my old signature here to my present username. I'm trying to get rid of all my sigs from that old username. Thanks! LittleMountain5 15:25, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Bane (comics)

Hello, I was just reading through the article and I must say it is terrific. Is there anything you want to do to get it to GA? Alientraveller (talk) 19:20, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

RE: HBK

Spooky! I was just looking through HBK's article. I think the sources look much better, and it's looking pretty good overall. Do we want to try and incorporate the new "out of universe" writing style into the article, or do we want to see how SummerSlam (2003)'s FAC goes first? All the FA reviewers seem pleased with the new style, so I think we should try and incorporate it the best we can...explain the moves better and link real names. We should also try and fix the overlinking problem...some of the wrestlers are linked a lot throughout the article. The last thing I can think of right now is that the MSG incident is mentioned in the lead and in the pic, but not the text. I've got a book that explains it pretty well, so I'll add in some info with the sources (either later tonight or tomorrow, depending on how long it takes me to find the book!). Nikki311 02:59, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Temple Sinai (Oakland, California)

Thanks for the helpful feedback. I think I've made all the required changes. Jayjg ^(talk) 05:47, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

IT looks good! Keep it up!--S_RX 18:42, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Absolutely, what is it?--S_RX 18:46, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Now how's it look? --LAX 18:50, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Whoops! At least you know what I meant. ;) --LAX 18:57, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Sure. I'm about to leave, I'll do it when I get back. I am also planning to make another FAC, if possible with Bad Blood (2003) and a DYK.--S_RX 19:00, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Maybe another feud could be outlined in the background. Other than that, I think it's pretty much done (except for sourcing, which I will probably do later). --LAX 19:05, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Hmm. I was thinking the London and Kendrick/Pit Bulls feud. Maybe both. --LAX 19:15, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

I'll just find what I can for both. If I can't find much for the divas feud, I won't add it. --LAX 19:19, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

30 Rock GA

I think i've fixed all the points you raised at Talk:30 Rock. Thanks for the review. -- Jɑɱǐε Jcɑ 23:33, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

GAN Downey jr

Some articles have been nominated for over a month, I think it's a bit unfair for the rest if RDJ gets a reviewer less than five minutes after being nominated. I know its an awesome article and all but I bet Paudge Behan could also build a robot out of scraps in a cave if he was ever given the chance. If you agree with me I'll add a note at the GAN page next to my nom, if you think that you should be able to review whatever you want then its fine by me too. Thaaaaaaanks.--Yamanbaiia^{(free hugs!)} 00:12, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Nothing personal, I just think its a bit unfair for those other articles, I'll leave it up to you. If you are going to review it now i'd appreciate it if you do it before sunday, i'm leaving the internetz until the 20th at least. I actually thought i'd had at least two weeks before someone picked it up. By the way, who's this batman you speak of? is he one of superman's sidekicks? --Yamanbaiia^{(free hugs!)} 01:06, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

I'll be eternally grateful if you can do it before Sunday. Just kidding about Batman, he's that superhero that can rearrange his facial structure and keeps coming and going and back again right? Oh and...isn't he THAT superhero?--Yamanbaiia^{(free hugs!)} 01:35, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Almost done? --Yamanbaiia^{(free hugs!)} 20:10, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Guestbook

		The Guestbook Barnstar
		For being the tenth person to sign my guestbook, I, La Pianista, award you this award </redundantness>. Cheers! —LaPianista! «talk» 00:22, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

It's a little late, but better late than never! ;) —LaPianista! ^«talk» 00:22, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

I think I'm done explaining the moves. I read his entire career, there is still a lot of jargon and poor word choice, before FAC I recommend opening a peer review for it. Also, I recommend placing the prose of the personal life into 1-3 of the same paragraphs.--S_RX 00:39, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

The thing is since it's already a GA, you can close the PR anytime you feel it's ready for FAC, as that is one of the outs to a PR. Plus, if you ask FA reviewers, they can help, that is how I got SS'03 ready for FAC.S_RX 00:57, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Alright, ttyl.--S_RX 01:07, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Temple Sinai

It was a good point, and I've fixed it now. Please let me know if you think it does the trick. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:09, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks again for all your hard work! Jayjg ^(talk) 04:04, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Archery at the 2004 Summer Olympics

I believe all of your concerns have been addressed. --LAX 15:16, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Back from California

I was in Los Angeles in the past week which is why I haven't been as active around here. I'm back now though – and I've got three music GANs, if you're interested ;) Gary King (talk) 16:44, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

I had lots of fun, but it was really hot and there were always very few clouds. Where I'm from, it rains at least once a day and it's almost always cloudy! Sure, of course that article has FL potential, but it's definitely nowhere near there yet. It will probably require a lot of copyediting in my opinion to get there, because of all the prose. Gary King (talk) 01:32, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Kirsten Dunst

Not sure, if you've missed it, but there's one bit of the GA review to complete. One sentence doesn't make sense. I would fix and pass it, but I don't know what's wrong. Peanut4 (talk) 20:52, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

No. The main change is still "The film is expected to be release in early of October 2008.[34] is also expected to portray peace activist Marla Ruzicka in Sweet Relief scripted by Lorene Scafaria for Warner Independent Pictures in 2009." There's either a word or a change of sentence structure needed.

I still also think the lead could do with a little bit of copy edit to remove the listy-edge to it. Peanut4 (talk) 22:35, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

It's not so much a matter of removing any film specifically, just make the text more vibrant. E.g. at the moment, first sentence great, second sentence great. Then "In 1990, she did this ..." "In 1994, she did that ..." The last sentence will be fine though once the previous given more context. Second par; "Did this ..." "Did that ..." Rest is then fine. And the third par is top notch.

Just put the third sentence of par one in context, and then say why the first two sentences of the second par are particularly relevant for a lead, and it should be superb. If you want to add anything back in, again say why it's particularly relevant.

Remember, the lead is the most important part of the article. Many readers won't read anything other than that. Peanut4 (talk) 23:40, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

PS, don't worry if I don't respond again tonight, or don't pass it, if everything looks great - I'm on a really slow machine and it's difficult to wait for pages to load!!! Peanut4 (talk) 23:41, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Obviously in the lead, you cannot list every film, so you have to be selective, which of course you have been. Her first role, her breakthrough role, her most well-known role etc have all been clearly-defined, which is superb. But reading this with a neutral view over Dunst's career, the lead doesn't specify why "In 1990, Dunst starred in The Bonfire of the Vanities, in which she played Tom Hanks' daughter." is more relevant than Star Trek or Little Women. Similarly, I don't know why Virgin Suicides was chosen over any of the other 15 roles since Interview With the Vampire, which is the last to be mentioned.

It's not just about fail/pass GA. Don't get me wrong, most of the lead is good. But one or two subtle but potentially key changes, could make the lead great. Peanut4 (talk) 00:04, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

I'm not sure, but you may have misunderstood my comments at the GAN page. The edit you have just made was to one of the sentences that was fine before. My comment was to add a similar description to the one you have just removed to the other three sentences I mentioned. I think you can undo the last edit, and make three similar small edits to those other sentences. Peanut4 (talk) 21:10, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

There is nothing wrong with mentioning films she's appeared in. There is nothing wrong with the skeleton of your lead. The films you have chosen to use in the lead, must be there for a specific reason. When writing the lead, you must have come up with a particularly cut-off point for various roles, but it doesn't appear obvious at the moment.

I suppose what I'm trying to say is from her 1994 role in Interview with the Vampire and 1999 role in The Virgin Suicides, she had 15 other roles. Another editor could come along and think, for example her role in Anastasia was more important, and change the second line of the current lead to "She also had a speaking role in the 1997 animation Anastasia, in which she played Young Anastasia" and on the face of it the lead is still the same.

Do you know what I mean? Peanut4 (talk) 21:27, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

I've added a full reply on the GA review page. Peanut4 (talk) 21:57, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Need for Speed

Want to help me expand this like WWE SmackDown (video game series).--S_RX 13:13, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

This should be more easy than SmackDown because it's a very simple game. I don't know anything about NFS neither but I learn by reading sources. Um, I'll work on the lead while you start the gameplay section, after I'm done the lead I will help you with that section. Read like the game manuals from IGn and read the gameplay, thats what I did w/ SmackDown.--S_RX 17:06, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Doesn't have to be, we need to do it for the FLC of Need for Speed.--S_RX 17:22, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Ok I'm almost done writing the Gameplay, I think writing the reception would be easier for you, no? --S_RX 17:16, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

It's okay, I forgot about it to, but I think it is easier for you to do the reception. Just use the one from WWE SmackDown. When you write this section, do not make the prose based on one source, which is what was mentioned in the GAN for WWE SmackDown, use a variety of reviews to explain the ups and downs of the games. How does the gameplay section look? I modeled it after the FA, Crazy Taxi (series).S_RX 17:21, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

That is there because of the "installments section", after we are done we can remove that section, so we dont need to worry about the citation tag.S_RX 17:37, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Sure. We can do that PPV. That may well be my last PPV for a while. --S_RX 17:52, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks and yeah, I do need one, I plan on taking one later this month. Okay, I think I'm done the gameplay section, does it live up to the gameplay as the Crazy Taxi (series)?S_RX 18:18, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! This may actually have a chance at GA and possible FA in the future.S_RX 18:32, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Yep, thanks. Let me know when you are done the reception section.S_RX 18:45, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

It's okay, take your time. I wont be on that much today either so..yeaS_RX 13:08, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Sure, I'll get to it later today. Our List of NFS titles is going to fail, after we are done the NFS series article and fix comments on the FLC page, we can nominate again later on.S_RX 13:18, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

I completed the copyedit for HBK. Yeah, the 3DO was the starting console, why? Ok so the list failed, I am going to be taking a break later this month, so IDK if I can get to it, but I addressed most of the concerns at the FLC, would you mind answering some of the new concerns addressed and those that are not striked out? S_RX 17:21, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Oh yeah, it should be for the 3DO then.S_RX 17:53, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

I'll get to it after I copyedit The Great American Bash (2005).--S_RX 20:14, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

I started the OOC CE for JD'05, due to the new format you need to write a reception and then remove the "aftermath" thats in the lead. S_RX 22:59, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Not to be a dick and all, but it will be easier for me to copyedit the article once you complete it, like do the "renovations".S_RX 23:31, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

After you write the article in the new format like SS, it will be easier for me to copyedit it, understand now? :)S_RX 23:40, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

I can't at the moment, but what do are you having trouble writing in that section?S_RX 23:57, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

The capacity is relatively easy to find, using ticket retailers is reliable in this case, so if you engine search Target Center capacity, you can use ticket retailers as a source. What do you mean by the cost?S_RX 00:24, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Use the one for basketball, then say it was cut down due to production of the event like I did in SS '03. The PPV cost is not necessary.S_RX 00:40, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

And why are you deleting my previous comment? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.29.92.18 (talk • contribs)

RE:Mount Adams (Washington)

Thanks for the review so far. I apologize I didn't respond faster, I was on vacation. However, it seems Burntnickel has done most of your requests already. Could you come back and give the article a runthrough? Thanks. --Meldshal [discuss] {contribs} 17:41, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. --Meldshal [discuss] {contribs} 17:51, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Could you check one of the sections? I'm confused with one of your points. Thank you, --Meldshal 22:03, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

I was confused that you stated that there was a POV sentence, but that sentence has been gone from the article for a ouple of days. --Meldshal 20:23, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Peer reviews

If you've got time, could you peer review two really short articles? They are:

• The Office (U.S. TV series) season 5 at Wikipedia:Peer review/The Office (U.S. TV series) season 5/archive1
• Half-Life 2: Episode Three at Wikipedia:Peer review/Half-Life 2: Episode Three/archive1

I am looking for reviews because I would like to be able to mark the articles as audited for a future featured topic nomination. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 02:24, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Alright no problem, I got some reviews already. Thanks anyways! Gary King (talk) 20:16, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

GAN Reviewer of the Month

		The Good Article Medal of Merit
		Congratulations, I have chosen you as the GAN Reviewer of the Month for the month of July 2008! Dr. Cash (talk) 23:24, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Wicked awesome. --  ThinkBlue  03:50, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Passing Mount Adams

Thank god. I just finished adding the final reference for the article, and I believe itmnow finally meets the guidelines. Please check it out (and hopefully pass it). --Meldshal 03:14, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! You were a great reviewer. I'm glad you got the award. --Meldshal 12:00, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Real Madric C F

Not wanting to be rude, but are you actually reviewing this article? The GAN list has it down as under review as of the 2 August, but I can't see any review work started on it. Grateful if you could update the situation as necessary - if you're pushed for time I'd suggest taking the 'under review' note off the GAN list. Cheers. 4u1e (talk) 17:46, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Sigh. I suppose it is always a bad idea to start off by saying that you don't intend to be rude or to criticise: it always gives the opposite impression. My apologies for any offence caused, none was intended. Nonetheless, it seems a legitimate question. There's a largish backlog in the sports and recreation section, and there have recently been several articles marked as under review that were not (only one of them by you). There seems little point in marking an article as being under review unless you're actually in the process of doing so, as the tag will likely put others off doing the work. However, as you imply, none of my business. Cheers. 4u1e (talk) 16:28, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

OWOW in FAs.

I fail to see how no source at all for that section is better than a source that is generally accepted though not proven 100% reliable. In addition, a current FA uses OWOW as a source for several things that no other RS could be found for. I really don't see how this is a problem. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 03:25, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

I thought that you were (and let me say that the article looks great), but I suppose you're right. Hell, not having those moves sourced may come off better in a FAC than "What makes this a reliable source?" Fair enough then. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 03:43, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

I could have swore that was something on the recent WT:PW archives that some FA reviewer stated OWOW was reliable, but I can't find it. Oh well. Admire me as an editor? Well, I think you're a much better editor than me, but to each his/her own. I guess. Thanks. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 03:57, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

I do do all that, but so most other project members and they have loads of GAs under their belt. I'm sort of a wikifairyish editor. I generally just fix the mistakes of others. Though I am trying to get Matt Sydal to GA if I could only find Personal life info... Gavyn Sykes (talk) 04:05, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Links two and three are good, thanks. I already used the first one for some move names, but it's written in kayfabe, so there's nothing on his (real) PL there. Anway, I plan to do a bit more work on the article and put it up for peer review soon enough. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 04:17, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

I've done that and it yielded me some great stuff. Quick question, what's the policy on "official" Myspace pages? And how can we tell if they are real? Gavyn Sykes (talk) 04:28, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

DYK 8/13

On 13 August, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Heights of Buildings Act of 1910, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Daniel Case (talk) 04:26, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Hehehe, BOOOYA!--S_RX 12:35, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Haha, the caption is funny, but you earned it, you did help somewhat, better than no help at all :)--S_RX 16:32, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Kinda, I have to copyedit some articles, why?--S_RX 19:18, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

It looks good so far, just a few things. Instead of saying "Pro wrestling is a ....." reword it to how I reworded it in SummerSlam (2003)'s lead, it flows more. Also, because UF '05 is a brand exclusive event, write it how I copyedited Armageddon (2006)'s lead, it also flows more. Also, remove the paragraph about the feuds in the lead and add a little bit about the reception, other than that, the lead works.S_RX 21:40, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

There we go, great job. I need to start doing that to my other GA's, ehh, I hate this new format now (haha and I created it)--S_RX 23:23, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Haha, shame on me. I'll try, I need to make like a copyedit to do list, lol.S_RX 23:37, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Haha, yeah you are third, just check the new notice banner I made and the new table I embedded, good?S_RX 00:13, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

You can steal it, I just don't know how it will work for you. I recommend you archive your talk page once it gets to 20 threads, it is too long sometimes. --S_RX 00:44, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

What do you mean?S_RX 01:01, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

I see, but it doesn't hurt to archive, I think you should incorporate the table so you can remove all these threads. You know you have a bunch of GA's that you are "reviewing", but you haven't reviewed them since you tagged them, just saying. Think it's best for that table.--S_RX 01:17, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

I think you should cut back on the amount of GA's you review, it's killing you. Don't review any new ones (aside from the ones you already [are] will be reviewing).S_RX 01:25, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

That's great. I'm taking a long wiki break after the FAC of SummerSlam, which is not going to good. Per many WP:PW users opposing per the format, arggh, I hate this.S_RX 01:36, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Look at what Killswitch is saying, I can't believe this crap, ehh, it seems I did SS'03 for no damn reason.S_RX 01:53, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Icehouse (band) GAN

I've complied with most of your statements at Icehouse GA1 page. Only exception is "Rom=Pari", I believe the equals sign should stay, it is part of the artist's name.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 04:39, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the positive review, I hope to get a few more articles up for GAN.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 03:54, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

WHY!?

WHY DO THEY ALWAYS SEND THE POOR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Tech43 (talk) 20:18, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Real Madrid C.F. GA

I hope i've answered all questions at Real Madrid C.F. Thanks.--KSA¹³ 14:26, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Laie Hawaii Temple

User:MPerel helped out with the GA review and tried to address the problems you found. Let me know if this works for you or not. Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 09:53, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your review. Viriditas (talk) 06:05, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Earthquake - possible GA

You were a great reviewer for Mount Adams, do you think you could look over this article real quick. --Meldshal42? 13:54, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Could you also look over this? Thanks, --Meldshal42? 17:22, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Lake Toba has been nominated at GAN. Please review it if you can. --Meldshal42? 17:38, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Um, not to sound hasty, but do you still want to review the article? Thanks, --LordSunday 13:13, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

I didn't mean it like that. You don't have to review earthquake. just Lake Toba. Cheers, --LordSunday 20:09, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Could you look over Lake Toba? i believe I have fixed some things. Thanks! --LordSunday 16:07, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

		The Good Article Reviewer's Medal of Merit
		For excellent reviews at good article nominations, I award you this Good Article Reviewer's Medal of Merit. Thank you, and congrats. --LordSunday 22:21, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for being such a big help? Before you're off to college, could you review earthquake? Cheers, --Lord₪Sunday 15:04, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Oh. Aorry about that, how was your first day? College is far away for me. ;) --Lord₪Sunday 15:10, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Although I don't like advertising my age... six years. --Lord₪Sunday 15:20, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Jesper Blomqvist

Hi there, I've been working on this article lately, Toon05 recommended I ask you for your opinion on the article. Thanks in advance BeL1EveR (talk) 18:50, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Olympic road race GA

Greetings. I noticed you indicated that you would review Cycling at the 2008 Summer Olympics - Men's road race for the GA criteria. I thought I'd let you know that the article is quite stable at this point, and (unless images specific to the event are found) the only further edits are likely to be minor housekeeping matters. Do you know when you might get to reviewing the article?

Thanks. Nosleep (talk) 14:19, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Hey, no rush. I was shocked anyone would even respond this quickly. It's all good ;) Nosleep (talk) 03:19, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Sorry..

Sorry I couldn't help you expand Bad Blood (2004), which I see you are ready to nominate for GA, but I've been real busy, this is my last free week. I plan on taking my long wiki break next week, so I will finish up my CE requests and that will be it for the week, I have Unforgiven more than 1/2 done (I think). I will finish it up tomorrow.--S_RX 02:29, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

I'll try to squeeze BB tomorrow, good luck in college, what college you going 2? Not to sound like a dick, but can you reply on the last thread of my talk page, I hate scrolling in the middle of the page :) --S_RX 02:40, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter

Sorry about the delay. AWB has been having a few issues lately. Here is the august issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter! Dr. Cash (talk) 20:55, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Unforgiven (2005)

I completed the copyedit for Unforgiven, if you have any questions don't hesitate to ask.--S_RX 00:22, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

I will give you feedback on Bad Blood tomorrow. Oh' thats cool, what are you majoring in? In all honestly, in it's current state no, but with work yes. The main thing is there is poor word choice and some of the explanation is very wordy. Since this was written before the new format, its in this format because some of the prose is very long as well.--S_RX 02:56, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

No it's not rude, it was just a copyedit, you never know I may have missed something.--S_RX 03:19, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, btw SS is going good, 3 supports no opposes, but Tony's comment really got me..S_RX 03:30, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

So he was talking about the ring names?..lolS_RX 03:42, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Ohh, lol I see now. :p S_RX 13:44, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

I copedited Bad Blood for you, their were still some flaws but I fixed them. One thing you need to watch out for when writing these PPV's, you go way into much detail for the BG and AM, look at SS'03's aftermath, I was told to cut it down and I did, you don't have to write like another BG section for the AM, just summarize. For the BG, you don't have to list every detail like they were booked in a match for tag team match after the attack, not relevant to the rivalry. Check here for the difference. Sorry to sound like a dick. :)--S_RX 14:27, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Looks much better, you should also cut down the BG a little bit as well.S_RX 16:58, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Oh, my bad, I didn't notice that. lol--S_RX 17:12, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Wow thats a good amount of KB down, hey how does List of celebrities at WrestleMania look?S_RX 23:40, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

You deserve this

I see your name on my watchlist all the time, either helping someone, nominating an article for GA, or reviewing an article for GA, I believe you deserve this for all your hard work.

		The Working Woman's Barnstar
		For all your hard work and never stopping.--WillC 04:00, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

No problem, you deserve it.--WillC 17:24, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

No problem, I just happened to see the new section added and didn't think the title would be a nice message so I decided to check it out. Just did what was right. Anyway, I was getting ready to ask you a question, so I guess it all fell into place. If you have time later can you ready an article for me to tell me how it sounds?--WillC 23:48, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Well at the moment I'm working on it. Last minute fixes before I nominate it for GA. It is Sacrifice (2008). I had a peer review a while back but because of the new changes in PPVs for Out of Universe almost everything in it has been changed and I was wanting a very good opinion from someone who knows if it will survive the GA review. After I'm finished with the changes I'll tell you. I need to make sure there is no over linking and explain the moves and better explain the matches. So I'll tell you here in a few minutes. Thanks for the help.--WillC 00:11, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm done with it. I got side tracked so it took me longer than I wanted it too. Just for you to know, I use the words, followed by, then, and Before the match alot. I have tried to make it sound as good as I can make it. I've been working on alot of other articles so this one hasn't been number one priority to me. Again thanks for the help. I'm off to nominate it for GA.--WillC 03:16, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Hey, how are you doing? Well I have Sacrifice done. I've read through it and it sounds okay to me. The review should fix everything else and your input will help as well. I would review unforgiven and Judgment day for you but I'm not sure what a FA is at the moment, so I'm sorry I can't really give anything on my end. I await for your feed back for a pre-GA review.--WillC 18:21, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Done and thanks for the feed back.--WillC 22:05, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Al Gore

Hi ThinkBlue,

Thanks so much for reviewing the Al Gore article. Your insights were very helpful. All of your suggestions seem to be an easy fix - it's just a matter of the time it takes to go through them. Rather than leaving a long trail on the Al Gore page, I'll just let you know when I've finished going through them. Regards, -Classicfilms (talk) 19:39, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

A minor question

I do have one minor question. You had requested the references use the {{cite web}}: Empty citation (help) format. I'm not certain what should be changed since they use this format - which is the vertical, rather than horizontal, version of {{cite web}}: Empty citation (help):

If you could clarify this suggestion, I would appreciate it. Thanks -Classicfilms (talk) 19:47, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Got it - missed those references in the intro. Great, as long as the vertical format is ok, I'm going to go ahead and fix #11 and others that lack it. The rest seems clear, it's just a matter of doing it. I'll let you know when I'm done. Thanks again, -Classicfilms (talk) 20:24, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

GAN fixes

I've completed the GAN fixes for Al Gore - at least as far as I can tell, I might have missed a date or two. Perhaps you can take a look and see if anything else needs to be done? -Classicfilms (talk) 00:08, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for all of your hard work! -Classicfilms (talk) 00:55, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

One more request

Hi ThinkBlue,

I wonder if you could help with one more thing - I am having difficulty combining the article history template for Al Gore with the GA template - I wonder if I could ask you to do so and to update the article history with the GA status? Thanks. -Classicfilms (talk) 01:10, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Is it an automatic change or do I need to contact this person? -Classicfilms (talk) 01:16, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Great! Thanks. -Classicfilms (talk) 01:17, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Ok, I've placed a peer review request. Thanks for the suggestion. -Classicfilms (talk) 01:30, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Could you do me a favor?

I see you that you seem to have a thing for GA reviews. In keeping with the unofficial rule of reviewing an article when you nominate one, I decided to review Harmon Killebrew. I put it on hold for a week, and the editors addressed most of my concerns. However, I'm still not certain it should be passed, and have asked for a second opinion at WP:GAN. No one has yet come in to offer that second opinion.

It shouldn't take very long (the article is really close, but for some reason I'm still kind of hesitating to pass it), and I'd really appreciate it if you could help me out. Thanks. (and thanks for passing the cycling article! :) ) Don't fall asleep ^zzzzzz 23:01, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Whatever you can do. The editors don't seem to terribly mind being in GA purgatory, so if they (and I) need to wait further for a second opinion, that is OK. Don't fall asleep ^zzzzzz 23:06, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

You obviously have much more experience than I do :P Thank you very much. Don't fall asleep ^zzzzzz 23:32, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		You reverse so many vandalisms you look like a bot. :) So I give this award for being the most tireless human vandalism figther ThaddeusB (talk) 23:11, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

He has been warned and I warned him again, if he does it again report him to an admin.--S_RX 01:44, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Los Angeles Lakers

Hi, im looking for users who have reviewed GA articles nominations, can you review the Los Angeles Lakers article so it could become a GA. Thanks. BlueRed 05:04, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

That's all right. BlueRed 20:03, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 22:50, 23 August 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

SummerSlam 2003

Thanks for the Barnstar blue it means a lot, I'm just glad to set an example for the project :)--S_RX 00:31, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Matt Sydal

Would you be willing to peer review this article. I've gotten several reviews so far and would appreciate your input. Thanks. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 02:17, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. And I'd be happy to review those later today, probably around 3PM EST when my other class ends. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 14:38, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Done and done. :) Gavyn Sykes (talk) 19:02, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Replied. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 21:27, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Re:Feedback

Sorry, but I can't take this on. I've permanently given up Peer Review, finding it too tedious and tiresome for my wee attention span to handle. Go on, I know this is very rude and selfish of me, but it was also part of the reason why I almost quit.

4give? :)

LaPianista! «talk» 03:14, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

LaPianista! «talk» has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Mitchell Reiss article

You reverted my edits on the Mitchell Reiss article, I am not sure why?

"Mitchell Reiss is Republican Candidate Mitt Romney’s national security advisor"

Mitt Romney dropped out of the election in February, I doubt he keeps his full campaign staff months after dropping out.

"and is currently U.S. Special Envoy to Northern Ireland, with the diplomatic rank of Ambassador, having succeeded Richard Haass in this role."

He was replaced with Paula Dobriansky in 2007.

http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2007/79217.htm

"Reiss is expected to step down from his role in Northern Ireland on January 31, 2007, and will be followed by Paula Dobriansky."

He has been replaced and it is now August 2008. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.19.222.40 (talk) 21:36, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

De-linking

Is there any particular reason you are going through and de-linking all dates in PPV articles? At the very least the date in the infobox should be linked. TJ Spyke 17:10, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

To add on, there is nothing saying that linking dates is not allowed, just that it's not standard practice anymore (it also does not say anything about going through and de-linking ones already linked). Please stop doing this until it can be discussed, I don't feel like going back and undoing your good intentions. TJ Spyke 17:17, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Not Vandalism

The edit I Made for Rugrats, is not vandalism it's true information. (Please Respond Soon.)--DJ WikiBob (talk) 19:58, 27 August 2008 (UTC)DJ WikiBob

Personal Attacks

Your reverting of the edits to the [Ryanair] page constitutes disruptive editing, and has been reverted. Please read the discussion page before editing again. 87.74.2.211 (talk) 20:34, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

87.74.2.211 is on a 3RR warning. He/she has reverted seven times in the past 24 hours and is the only one engaged in an edit war. Harry the Dog WOOF 20:41, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

There was another incident at Limoges in April, and the IP was looking at that discussion and adding it, thinking it was related to this one. That's why I started a new section. I was actually confused myself! Harry the Dog WOOF 20:47, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Question

How you think am doing so far? RkOrToN 22:33, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Of course you can, I'm just trying my best to fill up alot of spots ;) RkOrToN 21:58, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Definally, or some of the featured articles like Halo 3 or good articles like GTA IV (By the way, I am like totally awesome at GH3 I beat Through the Fire and Flames already on expert, and TDWDTG. Am really good at FC'ing Raining Blood or any DLC, and I'm waiting for World Tour Its going to be awesome =] )

P.S. I using Iron Man (video game) as my reference. RkOrToN 03:47, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Well, i'm going to try and do as much as I can for 2 days, because I will be limited when school starts. RkOrToN 00:33, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

:P Yea I dont want to fail my last year at high school. RkOrToN 01:48, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Feedback

Real busy. Im on an organization that gets busy when there is a campus event. Anyway, thanks for the congratulation. I think the article is really good, especially that you got lots of talk in the background section and there are already the most important aspects of a song-related article. Maybe you have to bulk up other sections and the music and lyrics is a bit POVic because of the words/phrases like "ambient intro" and "brings an electrifying jolt to the striking piano melody" typical of a song review article. --Efe (talk) 11:56, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

I just came back today, but I will try little by little as I am limited by school.--S_RX 22:29, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Seems good too. --Efe (talk) 07:45, 30 August 2008 (UTC)rs

Stupid answer too. I don't know how. Hehe. But as far as uploading in concern, I think you'll just hit the same button: Upload File. However, the audio sample should be of 30 seconds length. I dont know how to do it, do you? --Efe (talk) 06:14, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

It depends upon the presentation of the subject. Those files are added to enhance understanding. If its for decorative purposes only, it fails to comply our non-free content criteria. --Efe (talk) 03:49, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Always welcome. You may consult Giggy about uploading audio samples. --Efe (talk) 02:40, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

I sometimes suck at grammar and I really dont have a good copy edit. But with the unfamiliar subject, maybe it can help me spot some minor glitches. I'll try. BTW, I'll be working on some Coldplay-related articles someday. Hope I'll have the time to do so. --Efe (talk) 02:51, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

I even have problems with this so I dont know if I can satisfy you. Anyway, I'll try my best. Yah. I have the interest in getting articles to GA status when there are lots of online sources and I got a handful of Coldplay articles. We can collaborate buddy. I am just hoping I'll have the time. Getting busy in school. --Efe (talk) 03:06, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

That's true. Everything we do, it applies. Cheers. --Efe (talk) 00:14, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

That's my third. Thanks. I'll check it later, I still have my class. --Efe (talk) 00:24, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Seems ok. All major aspects of the topic are there. Maybe the music video section needs some more. --Efe (talk) 11:28, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Hey, its fine. I can handle your pleases if I have time. I actually dont read it wholly but seeing the major aspects of the subject are there, then it will absolutely pass. =) --Efe (talk) 11:03, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Always welcome. --Efe (talk) 05:56, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 16:02, 31 August 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Films roll call and coordinator elections

Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 06:43, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Peer review request

I don't know if you usually do peer reviews, but if you've got time, could you review What's It Gonna Be (Beyoncé Knowles song) at Wikipedia:Peer review/What's It Gonna Be (Beyoncé Knowles song)/archive1? It's a really short article but I'm looking for reviews anyways, since it would most likely fail a GAN so I won't even try with that. Thanks in advance! Gary King (talk) 21:51, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

I wasn't looking for any specific suggestions, so anything you've got to improve the article – including copyedits, new additions, etc. – is fine by me! Gary King (talk) 04:36, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films August 2008 Newsletter

The August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:30, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Nothing Offensive...

I want to be a psychiatrist and I wanted to know her views on things like that trying to learn how peoples minds work when they think about stuff like atheism and the lifestyle of a vegeterian. Nikki311 was both of those and I finally found somebody who might be able to express her views on things like that. Didn't mean anything offensive by the way just wanting to know her views on such things. No need to get upset about it. I feel no need to apologize about the situation so I will leave it at that, by saying to bad for her that she didn't want to share her views on her beliefs with me, but I will find somebody who does. —Preceding unsigned comment added by HairyPerry (talk • contribs) 18:25, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

For the first thing that was accident deleting your messages because they showed up on my talk page when I was talking to you, or so I though it was my talk page. Another thing, it is a social site I talk to people all the time on here if you talk to people ain't that considered social. I reverted my own edits that were on her page, becuase I felt bad so just calm down everythings ok. I'm working on a WikiProject and don't have time for your stuff, so just keep at peace.

User:HairyPerry 18:40, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

My RfA

Thank you for your support in my recent RfA, which was successful with 58 support, 4 oppose and 1 neutral. Kind regards. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:41, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Alternative Music Newsletter for August 2008

The Alternative music WikiProject Newsletter Issue 17 - August 2008

"Oh, we've been called an alternative band before. But we eat meat, so I think we're disqualified: chili dogs, corn dogs, Jimmy Dean Sausage Breakfast."- Kurt Cobain Project news "My Happiness" (song) reached featured article status in the past month! Well done to Giggy. Isobel Campbell discography, List of Nine Inch Nails awards, List of Soundgarden awards, and List of Pearl Jam awards reached featured list status during the past month. Well done to Red157, Drewcifer3000, -5-, and Be Black Hole Sun. Flea (musician) was featured on the Main Page on August 19. We collaborated on "Interstate Love Song", The Smiths, Viva la Vida or Death and All His Friends, Sub Pop, and Bleach (album) during the past month. During the month of August, Superunknown, Vs. (Pearl Jam album), Black Holes & Revelations, "Clocks" (song), and Disintegration were promoted to good article status. We are currently discussing various alternative rock albums as possible candidates for a project-wide Featured Topic collaboration. Please join the discussion here. This month's "Recommended Alternative Album" is Velocity Girl - Copacetic (1993).

New members Corythepaperboy, Hiram111, Yozzer66, and Lugnuts joined the alternative music fold during August. Editors User:WesleyDodds

SoxBot II (talk) 21:45, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Real Madrid

What you thunk for bring Real Mdrid to FA?--Djuneyt tr (talk) 16:36, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Cite Web" template on Viva la Vida

That website has mostly inaccurate information. For instance, they invent a "Belgian Singles Chart" when there is no Belgian Singles Chart, and Officially, there is separate Flanders and Walloonia Charts. As well as the addition of a Chart which cannot be trusted, The "United World Chart", which had its large Wikipedia article deleted this past summer since the chart was so misleading. It does have some useful information, such as (in my expierience), a mostly accurate German Singles Chart, which is useful since Media Control does not release an official chart. Also they have additions of largely unreliable charts such as the Argentina, Brazil, and Chile Singles Charts. Also, there were far too many charts, as WP:CHARTS states no more than 18 charts should exist on a page, and before the edit spree, there was 17, room enough for one more.24.111.234.4 (talk) 18:41, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Judgement 2005

DO you mean remove the OOu, or make the article OOu? Thanks, Genius101 Wizard (talk) 23:22, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Actually I dont know what you mean. Isn't consensus at WP:WP to make articles out-of-universe? Thanks, Genius101 Wizard (talk) 23:34, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Ok, I'll do my best on it. The way you said your first message confused me. Anyway, I'll see what I can do. Thanks, Genius101 Wizard (talk) 23:43, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

I've taken a look at it, and it won't be too hard to change. Someone has already done half of of it. Thanks, Genius101 Wizard (talk) 00:18, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Waking Up the Neighbours

What do you mean with "In the Canadian content section, add a period after this sentence ---> "The album made much controversy in Canada concerning the system of Canadian Content"."? --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 13:37, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

I fixed all the problems on the Waking Up the Neighbours article, and if you could review the Run to You (Bryan Adams song) article which is a current GA nominee. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 18:42, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Bad Blood

WOOO! Back-to-Back GA's, Good job SRX and Blue!!..lol--S_RX 23:57, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

It has a a chance, but it needs work, like tweaking to comply with MOS.--S_RX 00:05, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

I don't have time at them moment to go in-depth, but like minor issues that become an issue at FAC, like it did for SS03, like grammar (a big one) and the length of the article and the way the jargon is explained.--S_RX 00:10, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

HBK has a strong chance at FAC, the only thing stopping it is the grammatical issues, but other than that it looks like a strong candidate, I would focus more on HBK as it has a better chance than your PPV articles (no offense).--S_RX 00:16, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

LMAO! I didn't mean it in a bad way, I mean you have several GA's of your own, and SS03 wouldn't have passed without the PR and the many comments at FAC, it was about to fail but I was lucky it got restarted. But you've worked harder on HBK than on any other article and you should focus on that before you focus on a PPV.--S_RX 00:24, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I haven't really been as active lately. Thank you! I plan on nominating it for FA status (you know, after the waiting period). I think it should have no real problems. What do you think? Does it look good to you? --LAX 23:03, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! Well, the GA reviewer brought that up, so I just added it. It's really not that big of a deal, IMO. CANOE is a website, not a magazine. So, yeah. It shouldn't be capitalized. --LAX 00:28, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, bad ass match for sure, HBK for FA will be a no brainer.S_RX 20:04, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Nope, because if his name is already spelled out fully (real/fake name) in the prose, no need for it in the image caption.--S_RX 20:18, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Hmmm, I don't think I can commit myself to it due to school, completing these type of articles take less time. I can probably only format the table and some of the lead and you can do the history, and another section that would be good would be a reception section, but in this way I think it would qualify more for GA than FL.S_RX 20:27, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

I'm not working on anything else. Sure which one?S_RX 20:53, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

So far so good, notify me before you nominate it for FL so i can give it a pre FLC review.S_RX 20:59, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, there is no restriction that you have to go in order, it's okay to just go ahead with what you want to complete, its like the PPV's.S_RX 21:12, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

No problem :)S_RX 21:27, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

I might, I might not. I would like it to pass an FA, but I would have to really work hard for that to happen. I needs alot of work. But who knows? I might just work on something else. --LAX 21:53, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Maybe...

Its too far but it can help though. I spotted some related pics in flickr.com. Here --Efe (talk) 06:01, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

The Dark Knight (film) GAN

I don't know if you've noticed, but The Dark Knight (film) has been nominated for GAN, if you're interested in reviewing it ;) Gary King (talk) 16:24, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Guitar Method GAN

Hi ThinkBlue,

I think I've addressed your concerns regarding this article's GA candidacy. The lead needs work by anyone's standards though, so if you have any comments on that I'd jump at the chance to address them!

Thanks for taking the time to review it anyway. Seegoon (talk) 09:08, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Awesome! That's a first for me. Thank you! Seegoon (talk) 15:26, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Simon Wormull GA

Hey, thanks for taking the trouble to review Simon Wormull, and particular thanks for finding so little wrong with it :-) cheers, Struway2 (talk) 11:00, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for signing my guestbook

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		Thank you for signing my guestbook. LAAFan

Hed PE

I responded to your comments on the GA review. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 01:24, 10 September 2008 (UTC))

GAN: Pennsylvania Mutiny of 1783

Hi ThinkBlue. I responded to your comments on Pennsylvania Mutiny of 1783. Thanks for taking the time to offer a review. Best always, epicAdam^(talk) 16:08, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Above x2. Thanks! -epicAdam^(talk) 22:07, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Good article subpages

Just FYI I notice you use {{/GA1}} for Good article reviews; the full path should be used, like Talk:Kung Fu Panda/GA1, so that the link still works once the review is archived. Gary King (talk) 18:16, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the review! Also, if you've got a chance could you take a look at Suga Mama and/or StarCraft (series) (currently looking for a 2nd opinion) for GA? Thanks in advance! Gary King (talk) 20:07, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Alright no problemo Gary King (talk) 20:11, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Yeah what? Gary King (talk) 03:45, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

TDKF now a GA :) Gary King (talk) 05:17, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

GAN review of South African War Memorial

Hi! I think I've taken care of the problems you found at Talk:South African War Memorial (South Australia) - thanks for having a look, and feel free to let me know if I stuffed up with the fixes. :) - Bilby (talk) 22:29, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

That was dumb of me - it's probably too early in the morning. :) It should be fixed now. - Bilby (talk) 22:59, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks heaps for taking the time to review the article - I'm really happy about that one, as it was the first (and only) new article that I've created. :) - Bilby (talk) 16:35, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject California roll call

Hello from WikiProject California!

As part of a recent update to our project main page we are conducting a roll call to check which members are still active and interested in working on California related content. If you are still interested in participating, simply move your username from the inactive section of the participant list to the active section. I hope you will find the redesigned project pages helpful, and I wanted to welcome you back to the project. If you want you can take a look at the newly redesigned:

• Main Page
  
• Talk page
  
• Cleanup listing
  
• Template list
  

As well as the existing pages:

• Assessment
  
• Article Worklist
  
• Deletion sorting
  

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page, and add it to your watchlist, if it isn't already.

Again, hi! Optigan13 (talk) 00:38, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

"Suga Mama"

I think its now ready for a GA status. Please check. --Efe (talk) 11:47, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. By the way, how about our collabo? --Efe (talk) 00:10, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

I think I'm done with Destiny Fulfilled. Please check and thanks for the review. --Efe (talk) 12:29, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

I have now fulfilled your request, two GAs for Coldplay-related songs: "Clocks" and "Yellow". --Efe (talk) 01:05, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Not for now, I have three: Parachutes, A Rush of Blood to the Head, and X&Y. Wanna help? --Efe (talk) 00:13, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

I have started all three and I think the first two are in good stand. I am planning to nominate them altogether. --Efe (talk) 06:16, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Of course yes! I'll help you also get the three out in that GAN room. --Efe (talk) 07:46, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

"Speed of Sound" now a GA. Grats. And good luck on the WikiCup. You need more. Hehe. =) --Efe (talk) 08:08, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Almost done with X&Y. --Efe (talk) 09:31, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

I have nominated the three. --Efe (talk) 11:15, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Effects of Hurricane Noel in the United States

Just wanted to let you know I replied on that GAN. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 14:30, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

East Midwood Jewish Center

Thank you for reviewing it, and promoting it! Jayjg ^(talk) 01:18, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Peter Bynoe GA

I hope I have addressed your concerns.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 04:18, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

How is it now?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 05:37, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Did you forget to put Bynoe in a category at WP:GA?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 23:50, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Hey.

Hey ThinkBlue. I was just wondering do you have anything against me, I know we've never talked to each other, but every time I send a message to you, you never reply to my message. So I was just wondering do you have anything against me?. Save Us.Y2J

You haven't offended me, and when I used to ask you questions about Triple H's photo, that was in the past and I believe we are over that. And if you ever want talk to me, just add me on Yahoo. It's [email protected]. I won't bother you anymore because you are a GA reviewer, and working on articles. Save Us.Y2J

Doesn't No Mercy have to get past the waiting list? Save Us.Y2J

What's your Yahoo? Save Us.Y2J

I added you, all I have to do now is wait. Save Us.Y2J

Come on, one more

Could you please review Nevado del Ruiz? You know you want to... :) —Sunday ^Note 12:58, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Thank you, thank you, thank you. I'm trying to feature this tragedy. Eventually... —§unday His Grandiloquence 01:45, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

PR for HBK

I will comment on the PR, but since i'm so used to the article, my eyes won't catch everyhting. I recommend having FA reviewers or even GA reviewers to come check it out to find faults in it, thats what I did and just look at how it turned out.--S_RX 19:45, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

First start with known people, like Nikki and Nici, then try BrianBoulton, but he's on Vacation right now, try User:Giants2008, User:Malleus Fatuorum, User:Giggy, and User:Ealdgyth (for ref checks).--S_RX 19:50, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, its good to ask, if they say no, then go to other people. Go to the FAC page and just ask anybody who has commented on an FAC. (thats how I found those people)--S_RX 20:01, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

I dont think so, I just asked everybody at the same time and eventually they all pulled through.--S_RX 20:08, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Looks good so far, but I'm pretty sure that seasons and episodes coincide with their numbers no? Like since its the ninth season, wouldn't it be Ep. 912? Also, a comma is needed somewhere in the first part of the first sentence in the second paragraph (cant get the exact point where as of writing this message). Question, where are you getting the plots from or are you writing it yourself?--S_RX 20:26, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Oh okay, I see now, I didn't see the "prod. code" to the right :) Looks good so far.S_RX 20:44, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

It looks like the simpsons the voice actors had also won awards, and also won more awards than SP. Also, I think their season was longer and it looks like they gave a bit more info in the lead and DVD release section. S_RX 21:00, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Re:HBK

Hey, I'll try to look at it either tonight or tomorrow. iMatthew (talk) 21:38, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Yep, you do that.--S_RX 21:48, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

I also commented on the PR (my first comments). True, you should add the explanation and the fact that he won it when he won the final title to complete the GSC. --S_RX 21:59, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Sigh, WWE really needs new writers XD. His Euro reign was the final to complete it, not the WHC, he had already won the WWF title, so no need for the WHC reign. So explain it during his Euro reign.--S_RX 22:08, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

I replied.--S_RX 22:34, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Hmm, I would say something like to Hunter Hearst Hemsley, who was often referred to as Triple H (HHH),..etc.--S_RX 22:45, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Okay, +comments to PR from me.S_RX 22:53, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

GA Review: Sarah Conlon

Hey there, I've addressed all of your suggestions for the Sarah Conlon article. Please take a look when you're free, thanks! -Samuel Tan 05:28, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

About the edit war

You left me a message about being in a edit war with AltCrash over Kirsten Storms page. AltCrash seems to have ignored your message and went back to editing it. The user is editing it to Kirsten Storms is engaged to Elias Reidy. It is not true. Kirsten herself has said she is not engaged. The reason for this is because a friend of Stacey Winter, who is married to Ronnie Winter posted it on the Red Jumpsuit board (http://theredjumpsuit.proboards23.com/index.cgi?board=discussion&action=display&thread=2691) that he proposed for her birthday. But, Kirsten herself said that she is not engaged in a article that came out in late June/early July (http://i31.tinypic.com/263gdg8.png). I know, that it could be said that she doesn't want fans to know, but in the thread, the friend says that she is sure that they don't mind fans knowing. So it is false. A spokesperson for GH even stated in a Daytime Emmy Article, which happened in mid June, that the rumors are simply rumors. SpoiledTink (talk) 09:09, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Edinburgh Zoo

Thanks for the review and the detailed improvements, they were very helpful. I've made the changes you suggested and hopefully you can have another look at it. --Brideshead_{(leave a message)} 10:39, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 15:17, 14 September 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

i didn't delete any templates. that was just some angry person who doesnt like wrestling. Hollywoodd 05:51, 15 September 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kperfekt722 (talk • contribs)

Long time, no "see"

Yep, it's me. I'm back. I don't know how long I haven't been on the computer.... I'm going back to editing. Hit me up with what's happening and what I can do. :)Hell's Guardian 21:02, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

I also responded to a comment.--S_RX 21:11, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Notify me when you are done with the comments at the PR.--S_RX 20:27, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Re: Book info.

Sorry, I've had no time whatsoever today to look. I'll look tomorrow if I get a minute. Regards, D.M.N. (talk) 21:20, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Right I can't find anything about a hand injury. As for the other bit.... (pg ref is 203 and 204)

The next day, we had a television taping in Poughkeepsie. When I arrived at the building, Vince told me he wanted to talk. "Shawn, we are going to switch you to babyface."

"What! It's because of the kickout, isn't it?" [refence to something the previous night at WMXI]

"It was a bad call on my part. I admit it."

"Why is it affecting me? I'm the only heel that you have."

"They like you, the people like you, Shawn."

"They like me, but they like me to hate me. Now is not the time. You make the mistake and it costs me in my career!" I was not happy.

"We're going to have Sid drop you—injure you—tonight, and you'll go home for six weeks."

I was so frustrated, so bummed. We had told him that the people were going to boo. "Vince," I said, "I would never tell you how to run your entire business, but please, leave the wrestling to me."

Then I went and told Kevin what was happening. "They're taking me off for six weeks."

"What for?"

"They are turning me babyface."

"It's because of the kickout, isn't it!"

What could we do? Sid turned on me that night. He attacked me from behind and powerbombed me three times before Kevin rushed to the ring and chased him off. I was now injured and off on a six-week paid vacation.

Hope that's OK. D.M.N. (talk) 18:24, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

HBK

Hey, I'm sorry I haven't finished my review of HBK. I've been really busy and plan on finishing it. I have alot of crap happening in my life right now and I'm trying to get all the ppvs I've been writing done this week. I'll get to it either today or tomorrow.--WillC 22:07, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

I just didn't want you to think that I just did the lead and quit, I was planing on finishing that is why I didn't sign my comments but some crap came up and I got distracted.--WillC 22:18, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Okay, well how have you been? While I'm here I thought to ask.--WillC 22:24, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

I'm glad to hear. Just stressed beyond belief. A lot of crap in real has been screwing up. Plus I have No Surrender (2008), Hard Justice (2008), Victory Road (2008), Slammiversary (2008), and Destination X (2008) to all get done this week. As well as I have Sacrifice (2008) as a GAN and I have Lockdown (2008) up for peer review for FA. I have stress at home and stress on here, though somehow I handle it very well. If you met me in-person you could not tell one bit. But other than that I'm fine. I'm watching the main event for No Surrender. But enough about me, how are you coming on anything you're doing?--WillC 22:37, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

I actually don't have a deadline but I wanted to have all those done by the time TNA starts to build Bound for Glory IV. Since I plan to make it an FA. I want all of my attention place towards it. Well good luck on that.--WillC 23:11, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Hey Blue, I just wanted to let you know I haven't forgot about the PR, I've just been very very busy. I'll try to take a look at it tonight. iMatthew (talk) 10:18, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Did you find the book sources and did you change monikers to ring name?S_RX 20:58, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Okay, but I'll get to the review probably today, I can already feel today isn't going to be fun so it is still 50/50.--WillC 21:22, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

NO! you do not have to do that. I was going to comment on it no matter what. I need to start pulling more weight around here than just placing articles up for peer review and GA review. You aren't making me do anything, I'm just helping out a friend.--WillC 21:27, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Hey don't worry about my stuff. Hard Justice can't go up for GA till November, because the DVD is not out yet. Lockdown is going to get reviews by probably every FA reviewer because I left a message at everyone who reviewed SummerSlam (2003) asking them to review it. I don't need anything in return. I got one review for Lockdown on its first go around at peer review and it made it through the out of universe change and three GA reviews at one time to finally get to GA. I don't really need that many reviews. Look at GAB 05 and NO Mercy 05. They didn't have peer reviews after GA before FAC. GAB 05 made it and No Mercy might make it.--WillC 21:37, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Well I'm talking like before FA. I remember the old GAB 05 review before GA review but I was talking like, peer review, GA review, peer review, FA review. I never read JD 05. I'll take a look at it though.--WillC 21:52, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Okay, yeah I was thinking about reading and giving some comments before you said anything but I wasn't sure if I was going to do it. I noticed you only got a few comments on its peer review so I felt she needs more feed back. I do know that Unforgiven 05 will make it though.--WillC 22:00, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Okay, that is because I look at user pages. Plus you also give off the vibe you're a girl. Also I'm physic. I can see you have brown hair, you are around 5'7, and your nickname is thinkblue I'm not even close. Yes I believe Unforgiven is well written. Crap I think Lockdown is terrible but I got told by two people outside of the project it is well written. So if I think it is good then it must be good. no grantees.--WillC 22:28, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Okay, off by four inches. Crap. Thanks. Glad to hear it is good.--WillC 21:45, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Shitty. Lockdown and Hard Justice still have no reviews and I don't expect any. I don't really care about them anyways. How is HBK?--WillC 22:20, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Maybe later. I'm still not sure what I'm doing. Life is catching up to me again.--WillC 22:28, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Only if you want. It doesn't matter to me either way. After Turning Point (2008) I'm taking a break. Hopefully by then I'll be in school and everything in real life will not be so hard along with this crap I keep doing. IT! is amazing how addictive this is when you are bored as hell. But I don't want to whine about my problems. How is life treating you? Real life not Internet.--WillC 00:45, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Run to You (Bryan Adams song)

Fixed all the problems pointed out. Thanks for reviewing the page. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 12:43, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Oh before i forgett i'd like to invite you to join the newly-formed Rock music WikiProject. There's alot of Rock-related articles on Wikipedia that could use a little attention, and I hope this project can help organize an effort to improve them. So please, take a look and if you like what you see, help us get this project off the ground and a few Rock music pages into the front ranks of Wikipedia articles. Thanks! --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 18:39, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Heres the link if you want to become a member. Wikipedia:WikiProject Rock music/Members and heres a link to the main page Wikipedia:WikiProject Rock music. Does check mean that i've done it or needs to fix it? --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 19:04, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Fixed the date problem. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 19:06, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for joining and i have now unlinked all the years and dates. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 19:29, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing the article. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 19:46, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

WikiCup

weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 19:09, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films coordinator elections - voting now open!

Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 21:35, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Nevado del Ruiz

I've completed all your requests, is the article ready to pass? —§unday {Q} 00:50, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Alright, now its done. —§unday {Q} 19:21, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Jamie Stuart

Does it make any difference? Sorry, first article I've nominated for GA. --Jimbo^[online] 20:51, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

How long does the PR stay open for? I'm leaning towards ASAP as I'm only around for another week. --Jimbo^[online] 21:00, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Might as well do it now then. I don't come back til April! --Jimbo^[online] 21:06, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

I didn't get that impression at all. Cheers, --Jimbo^[online] 21:11, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Contractions

Hi there. I've reviewed In My Place and God Put a Smile upon Your Face, but during the reviews I noticed one general point. You shouldn't really use contractions in mainspace articles when they are not in quotes, i.e. I've and shouldn't that I have already used(!!) but also "who's" or "he's" that were in the articles. Peanut4 (talk) 21:28, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Not a worry at all. I just wanted to point it out to you to help you in future. The main point in the policy you referred to is "In English, contractions are commonly used in speech and informal writing." I.e. it's alright to use it in speech as I said, but informal writing would not include an encyclopedia or similar writing. Peanut4 (talk) 21:42, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Honestly no need to apologise. The easiest thing to remember is you can use them in quotes but don't otherwise use them in mainspace. I've added one more point in each of the two reviews and otherwise they should be ready. Peanut4 (talk) 21:53, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Joe Biden GAC changes/response is done

See Talk:Joe Biden/GA2. Thanks again. Wasted Time R (talk) 03:31, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks very much for the review and the pass!! Wasted Time R (talk) 23:02, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Scottish crest badge/GA1

Hi ThinkBlue, thanks for reviewing the article. I've tried to work on the points you brought up, and commented on them. The main one, i think, is the references using the citebook template. I've got all book refs listed using that template at the bottom of the article. But when the book refs appear in the footnotes they are only in shortened form (like here: WP:CITESHORT). Is that ok?--Celtus (talk) 10:04, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks alot for the review. :) --Celtus (talk) 08:49, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Bad Blood Peer Review

I scratched your back, can you scratch mines?..lol--S_RX 22:47, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

A bat will work :)--S_RX 22:55, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

I swung back at your pitch. lol--S_RX 23:30, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

PR request

I will be glad to look at it - it will probably take me a few days. Thanks for asking, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 01:33, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

I have an article to work on and it is third on my PR to do list, so two days should be enough (barring unforeseen complications) Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 01:45, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Unfortunately Blue, I'm not going to have time to finish Michaels review. I have too much on my hands right now, and Michaels article is way too long. I hope you forgive me! But I'd be glad to comment on a PR for a pay-per-view. Those are short and simple. iMatthew (talk) 14:10, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

RE

Hey, thanks. Sorry I haven't replied yet, and finished my HBK review, but a town that is 5 miles away from mine had a type of fun day called Cow Days, real redneck, you could even milk a cow in the middle of town if you wanted. So I went to it today and yesterday, I haven't been working on here much because of it. I'll take care of your comments and finish mine on HBK. How has your weekend been so far?--WillC 05:54, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

You know what I'm planning to do next? Make No Way Out (2004), a good article and one that failed FAC twice, another FAC, and this time pass. Wouldn't that be awesome?..lol--S_RX 23:03, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

With work, it can happen, by the end of the year the project may have over 20 FA's!--S_RX 20:26, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

lol, we can do it if the project puts their mind to it.--S_RX 20:33, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Going slowly, just need more comments on the PR, if not, I think I will just let it go straight to FAC, but first I need a copyedit from Nikki.--S_RX 20:38, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

I'll see if I'll take my chances :) You do have a choice, HBK!. I will close it after nominating it for FA, I can close it myself.S_RX 21:11, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Why have u given up?

Keep going, nominate it right now, learn from it, and if it fails, you know what to do to make it pass next time, that's how I took SS 03, which if you saw closely, almost failed.--S_RX 21:28, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Well that's one voice, I disagree with what he said because if you were to explain every feud that would make the article very long and thats what PPV's are for now, his career shouldn't even detail feud by feud.--S_RX 21:38, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

I know I would say that, but I can't speak for the FAC reviewers. How about nominating it for A-Class? Can you take a look at No Way Out (2004) and check out the difference. June 7, 2008 and current revision.--S_RX 21:49, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

You will just need I think its' two people to review the article, I'm not sure whether from the project or outside it. Thanks, now I just got to write the reception and nominate it for PR then FAC.--S_RX 21:58, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Like it is in SummerSlam (2003) and No Way Out (2004), don't have the explanation on me, why?S_RX 22:26, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Oh, well you are going to have to explain it since it is likely he will use it again in the match right? Also remember there is a new of doing it by embedding the explanation.S_RX 23:01, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Yep, still explain it.--S_RX 23:24, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

a move in which Angle tried slamming Booker down by spinning him and lifting him to a 90°, into a small package, a pinning maneuver in which the opponent falls backwards while turning, which the opponent hooks the far leg with their legs and the opponent's other leg with their free arm, ending up on top of the opponent, pinning their shoulders against the mat. How about, No need for the move name here.S_RX 23:56, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

My bad I meant, Angle tried to lift and twist Booker 90 degrees to slam him down, but Booker grabbed Angle's leg and rolled him into a pinfall. Comments would be appreciated on NWO's PR :)S_RX 23:24, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Was that a compliment? Lol--S_RX 23:30, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

You FINALLY ARCHIVE! Lol, I responded to your comments at the PR, thanks.--S_RX 00:06, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

What is the date on the link? (Sorry, can't open pdf files at the moment)S_RX 21:36, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Oh then yeah, Unforgiven is after that and I'm guessing that is the second quarter/4th quarter release of their finances, so Unforgiven is included :)S_RX 21:46, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

I guess, if you are following the same way SummerSlam 2003 was written then yeah :)--S_RX 21:53, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

I also responded.--S_RX 21:35, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Haha, I know, thanks. I replied at the peer review :)--S_RX 23:36, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Hahaha, yep.--S_RX 23:55, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

GAN of Louvre Abu Dhabi

Hi ThinkBlue. I have recently listed the above mentioned article for a GA review. It has been a GA nominee for about a week now. However, I am greatly desirous of receiving a review for the article. I would appreciate it if you could review it, if you find the time. Your comments would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance, --Jordan ^Contribs 13:55, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your review. I am currently busy improving the article as per your suggestions. Jordan ^Contribs 08:37, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Done. I have fixed up the references, added inline citations, expanded the lead and generally improved. What do you think? Jordan ^Contribs 09:34, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

I've touched up the last few rough spots. I think its ready. Jordan ^Contribs 08:22, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Only one of those references has a problem. The others are all named references, which changes the format and appearance. Reference twelve has been corrected and modified. Jordan ^Contribs 17:08, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

No longer a dead reference. Have fixed. Jordan ^Contribs 06:11, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

No Age

Hiya, Thinkblue. You recently reviewed No Age as a GA candidate. My good friend EnjoiNico and I are working on all of the improvements you listed. For starters, one question:

" Reference 3 and 9 need to be fixed."

What do you mean by this? Do they need to be put in cite web format? Thanks, BobAmnertiopsis∴_ChatMe! 21:37, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

many freaking subjects

Thanks for the peer review of Hard Justice (2008). I'll read HBK again after you close the peer review. Also here in a little bit I'm going to read Judgment Day (2005) and give some comments. Just thought to give you a heads up. Would you like me to read anything else for you?--WillC 23:40, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Hey don't give up hope. I'll help you with it if you want. I feel you can get it to FA. Go head and continue with HBK. Also just for you to know, I like him. He is cool so if you want me too, I'll review that when I find time. I can only be on the computer for two hours a day since I need to make a schedule for stuff I do everyday. I really liked him in Thank You for Smoking. I'll probably start the review for JD around when ECW comes on since that is the when I start my two hours a day. I just get on for about 5 minutes every little bit when I need a break.--WillC 01:16, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Okay, I've reviewed Judgment Day (2005). The link can be found here.--WillC 07:37, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Okay, I left some of my own. Yeah, I thought the Dark Knight was good but didn't live up to all the hype. Plus the way it ended made me go "what?". "Who the hell is he going to fight now?". I've been thinking about expanding an article outside of wrestling. I just happened to notice Thank You for Smoking. I think when I find time, I'll expand that article. What do you think?--WillC 21:11, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

I'm not saying it was bad. I enjoyed it but I just wish they didn't have to kill Two face. Riddler is the next villain which I'm looking forward too but it would have been better if two face stayed around. I'm going to buy it on DVD. I just saw a few problems with it. It was probably the best movie this year so far but I still think it had its problems. Plus my grandmother got in a wreck when I was watching it so I was too worried about her than the movie but I was with someone and I was told my grandmother was fine so I couldn't leave. First I have to get all this other stuff done but I can work on TYFS. I have the world X Cup, all the 08 ppvs by TNA, and the Impact video game. Also to make it clear, I liked the movie, it wasn't bad, if you want to talk about a bad movie then watch the third mummy. Were they drunk when they made it. It had a great storyline, but shitty flow.--WillC 21:26, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Oh I agree, Ledger did a great job. Why get excited about anything? What is the point of being excited at all? You're only given misery in return. Damn I need to quit letting people read poetry to me because I'm bored. I was looking forward to the mummy. Then it got here and I went to see it and got pissed. I thought it was a decent movie, I might buy it. But I just wish they could have done better. If I don't then who will? The only other guy I saw expanding them is blocked until further notice. Plus I have a plan that I'm going to make all the 08 ppvs FAs, then make a list of 08 ppvs. Take it to FL and have a Featured Topic if that will work.--WillC 21:41, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

What? I'm not angry. I'm a little upset I keep hearing Lockdown is too long. When if you go look at the event section it is near the same length as GAB 05 and SS 03. For a ppv that has every match inside a steel cage and TNA has gotten what a singles match it is kind of hard to make something under 40 kilobytes. Believe me, I'm addicted to this freaking thing. You aren't going to see retried on my user page. You may see blocked when I get pissed one day. Probably around the beginning of next year is when I'll take a break. I'm home schooled. I'm trying to go back this winter. If I go I'll be going to a school that is around 30 miles away. I'll get in all the sports. You will not see retired but you will see someone who isn't on as much.--WillC 21:57, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Damn, did you think you had enough pictures? Well just go to User:Wrestlinglover/Lockdown (2008) and see what it once was and now, the whole Evolution of it all if you what to use the terme. At one point I believe it was over 60 kilobytes. Now it is 45. I can get it to 42 or 41, but that means resourcing it and removing two of the table boxes. Thanks for liking my enthusiasm. That shows that people can tell I'm crazy. Right now I have no personnel life. I asked a girl out a few weeks ago and she said she had a boyfriend. I am working on this other girl who I asked out a few months ago and she said she had a boyfriend. Then I saw her Saturday for the first time in two or more years. She wants to hang out again. Which is very interesting. First she turns me down, and now she wants to hang with me. I must damn pretty. Plus a girl that I have been wanting to go out with since 04, but always is with a dude so I can't talk to her, is finally single and a friend of mine is probably about to go out with her after I told the retard that I wanted to go out with her. Hopefully God will be nice and let him screw up and then I get the shot.--WillC 22:27, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

I'm just joking. Oh I think it will all come along in due time. I'm too busy and stressed for a girlfriend at this moment. I don't want someone bitching on me all the time. WOMEN!!? oh shit I forgot, I'm sorry (lol)!--WillC 21:51, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Good. Now I wish I knew you in real life. Because all the girls I know are bitchy. I only knew one girl that wasn't, and she turned out to be a slut. I do not have good luck. They are coming along. I'll have No Surrender (2008) finished tonight. I'm working on Slammiversary (2008) and I'm hoping that I have it finished by Saturday. Here is what it looks like in my sandbox. Working a little on Victory Road (2008) in my sandbox. Hoping to have it finished soon. While I'm also working on Bound for Glory IV in my sandbox since it is TNA's main ppv and I do not want IPs to be screwing it up. So far alot of activity is on the article with only three matches. No telling what it would be like if I had the background out in the open. Lockdown is still under review. Sacrifice still has not been reviewed at GAN. Been trying to work on Destination X (2008).--WillC 22:19, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Well you're nice. That is why probably. Okay. It will probably be a while. I really need to stay focused on certain things. So how is your stuff coming?--WillC 22:39, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

If I were you I would take Unforgiven to FAC. I feel it is ready. When I find time. I'll read Unforgiven again as well as Bad Blood 04.--WillC 23:10, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Don't worry about JD. It will probably pass. I'm afraid for Lockdown though. So far SRX has found all sorts of problems with the lead. I feel it is going to be just like the first peer review. I'll get to BB maybe tonight or tomorrow.--WillC 23:26, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

If anyone will fail it will be me. Don't worry. I'll help you if you want. I'll help take care of all the little problems in the review that come up. Yeah you're probably right but he always wants me to remove background to matches and just keeps saying it is too long. The thing isn't that long. It is just the way I write. So I'll probably be the one to fail because of adding more than four matches.--WillC 23:49, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

re: Aaron Eckhart

Sure thing (I loved him as Two Face), but it'll have to wait until tomorrow, if that's all right? I'm off to class soon. María (habla conmigo) 20:09, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for drawing my attention to this article on my talk page. Unfortunately, I do not have time to work on or comment on it in its featured article review. In looking briefly at the article, I did notice a couple of things that I thought it might be worth passing on to you. In the lede (opening paragraphs), I think the phrase "and has given up smoking and drinking" is out of place with the preceding part of the sentence on Eckhart's developing an interest in "photography" and not encyclopedic; I also think that the ref. to the same point later is not encyclopedic. In general, it appears to me that the entire lede needs source citations throughout (I would put a "citations missing" template on it due to those omissions). Otherwise, I would caution against any kind of "fan" (or fansite) tone of voice or inclusion of trivia/minutiae, and just focus on mostly professonal career facts and not on celebrity personal information coming from or used in tabloids. Throughout "recently" needs correction; WP:MOS stresses not to use such relative time transitions ("now"; "lately"; "recently"--as time goes on, none of those has a specific referent). If one has an actual date (year, day/month/year) to document a statement or part of a statement, it is more useful to use the specific date and to document the statement/part of statement with a reliable third-party published source. If the article is still being edited for improvements (unstable), it may be too soon to have a featured article review. Good luck with your efforts. (I haven't read the review page; these are just observations about the article independent of any comments made there.) --NYScholar (talk) 20:00, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

NHL history, 1992-pres

Fixed those two issues. Maxim_(talk) 20:25, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

ThinkBlue

Hey, ThinkBlue, could you sign into Yahoo please?, because I need someone to talk to. Thanks. Save Us.Y2J

Could you dign into Yahoo. Save Us.Y2J

Louvre Abu Dhabi

I have fixed what I can, and I see you are now online and editing. If you have time, could you check up on the GA review for the article? Thanks, Jordan ^Contribs 17:40, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for all your help in reviewing the article. Your comments and suggestions were a great help. Much appreciated, Jordan ^Contribs 18:42, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Aaron Eckhart

I have transcluded the FAC to WP:FAC. Gary King (talk) 20:09, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Just to let you know, you haven't responded to all my comments at Bad Blood's PR.--S_RX 17:38, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

I don't know if you did them all or not, but at the PR, I responded to some comments which you have not.--S_RX 00:33, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

I added a few comments.--S_RX 01:07, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

I sent you an email.--S_RX 01:08, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

It's okay, I replied back (like 2 minutes ago).--S_RX 23:37, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Did you reply? With your BB or my BB?S_RX 23:43, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Well with '03, no one else commented on it. For '04, I added more comments. For FL's, not necessarily Rambling Man didn't have any (I think), if you just know the criteria well you'll do fine. Like look at some of the ones I commented, I just check mostly for mechanical errors in the prose and see if the table/list is good in structure, has refs, is understandable, and lists content in a way everyone can comprehend.S_RX 23:57, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Oh really? Thanks so much, I was lost on how to do that. Yay! Trust me, you gain more respect from other users when you get well known at FLC. I mostly comment on the new ones and sometimes on the backlog, it's easier. S_RX 00:05, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

My RfA

Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a count of (154/3/2). I appreciate the community's trust in me, and I will do my best to be sure it won't regret handing me the mop. I am honored by your trust and your support. Again, thank you. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 18:50, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

By the way, aren't you still looking for an admin coach? iMatthew (talk) 16:19, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Oh, your should ask around. ;) iMatthew (talk) 16:26, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

I'll have to get back to you. I'm a little stressed out right now. iMatthew (talk) 16:37, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 19:49, 28 September 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Think Blue

A minute ago, you wrote:

Yeah, its fine. I don't mind. I need all the help I can get to get the article to Feature status. Thank you for taking the time to look over the article and I will answer any questions, if any are asked.

— go HERE and help me out. Let us use the talkpage there for correspondence about the article.

Anne Teedham (talk) 20:54, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

more

Think Blue, go HERE and let me know what you think. Anne Anne Teedham (talk) 20:36, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

fini

I know: it took forever!!! *grin* Anne Teedham (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 20:28, 17 October 2008 (UTC).

Thank you 4 Telling Me

Thanks 4 telling me about dates not being linked anymore. I didn't know =-)

Baby16 (talk) 22:32, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

How Do I Win Awards Like You?

Baby16 (talk) 22:37, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

I added more comments to Bad Blood, and not sure if you got my last email.--S_RX 02:35, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Also, since working on List of WCW World Tag Team Champions, I've learned how to source the lists better without the need of having 148 references, where as we can source it with about 10 minimum and 30 max. Want to give it a shot to get you another FL :)--S_RX 20:33, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Remove all the references from the article that are from DDTDigest or PWWEW.net (they are unreliable), while I will find reliable sources. Hope that's easy :)--S_RX 20:41, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Eh, I'm having a hard time finding a reliable source.S_RX 21:58, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

I dont think there are other wrestling lists we could work on, but any other lists in mind we both could do.S_RX 22:05, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

With school in session, I really don't feel like writing an entire article. I rather do lists, they are simple IMO.S_RX 22:48, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, but I think we should wait off, and see if any other topics come up. Lets just chill right now..lolS_RX 23:31, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Problem with an article

Hi

I'm very new to Wikipedia and am trying to create an article that keeps being deleted by parsecboy. I'd like to talk to this person but cannot seem to create a talkback page which appears to be the item required to speak to him. Quite unlike this easy page of yours but anyhow. Can you please help me?

Thanks in advance,

Owen —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cre8solutions (talk • contribs) 17:54, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Mark Stimson

Many thanks for your comments, all tweaks now made as requested -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 06:59, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Jnplogo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Jnplogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:35, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Evil Avatar

ThinkBlue, if you check that IP/Users Talk page, you can see I have already opened up a dialog looking for some form of compromise. However, I can guess who the IP is and he'll just continue to remove data from the page that he doesn't "like".

Update And things continued as I guessed, he began changing IPs and continues to revert the comments he doesn't like, and now claimed to do a page "cleanup" (by moving the sections around and doing nothing more than removing those comments, again). *rolls eyes* I'd love a article lock on this.TrackZero (talk) 21:43, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Talk:2008 Pacific typhoon season/October

Hey there. I just wanted to let you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Talk:2008 Pacific typhoon season/October, as it is the practice of the WPTC to create such archives to document tropical cyclone activity, to make it easier to write articles later. Cheers. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 19:43, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

No worries, it took me a while to figure out what those things were for when I joined the WPTC. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 19:47, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Heh. Who would that be? :-) –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 19:58, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Alternative Music Newsletter for September 2008

The Alternative music WikiProject Newsletter Issue 18 - September 2008

"And suddenly the plane dropped to the right, then to the left, and the ground was right there. And all I could think was, Fuck, I didn’t finish "Fix You." That would have been my last thought: I didn’t get that chorus right."- Chris Martin Project news Disintegration reached featured article status in the past month! Well done to NSR77 and WesleyDodds. List of Björk awards, List of Rage Against the Machine awards, and List of awards and nominations received by Muse reached featured list status during the past month. Well done to Gary King, who wrote all three featured lists. David Lovering was featured on the Main Page on September 17. We collaborated on Parklife, Tragic Kingdom, Bauhaus (band), and OK Computer during the past month. During the month of September, The White Stripes, "Yellow" (song), No Depression (album), "Speed of Sound" (song), "The Scientist" (song), "God Put a Smile upon Your Face", "In My Place", Demolition Plot J-7, No Age, and "All the Way" (Eddie Vedder song) were promoted to good article status. Help us select good versions of WP:ALM articles for inclusion on the Wikipedia 0.7 release! Find out more about Wikipedia 0.7 selection on the project talk page and add your thoughts to the discussion. If you are personally responsible for a Featured or Good Article listed here, please the select a version to include in Wikipedia 0.7 on that page if you haven't already. Page versions must be selected by October 20. This month's "Recommended Alternative Album" is The Long Blondes - Someone to Drive You Home (2006).

New members ThinkBlue joined the alternative music fold during September. Editors User:WesleyDodds

SoxBot II (talk) 20:04, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

GA nomination for The Nightmare Before Christmas

Alright, the comments have been addressed. I think it's ready. Wildroot (talk) 22:10, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Did you notice the comment I left at Bad Blood's Peer Review?--S_RX 02:15, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject James Bond New Collaboration of the fortnight

WikiProject James Bond Collaboration of the fortnight (two weeks)

WikiProject James Bond:Collaboration of the fortnight The collaboration has returned!! THE COLLABORATION OF THE FORTNIGHT (6 September 2011 - 20 September 2011) is Production of the James Bond films edit this Please contribute by editing this article, in an attempt to get it to good article status For more information see the page here or contact SpecialWindler. Get in and Participate

 The Windler talk  04:46, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

GANs on hold

Hi Blue. Thanks for helping me. I' be been so busy. --Efe (talk) 09:06, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

By the way, Parachutes is now a GA. The reviewer did a good copy edit, although he/she was a reviewer. --Efe (talk) 09:07, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. --Efe (talk) 06:01, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks again. You too. Yeah, we will still pursue it. I think you have to nominate it since you got three out of five A rush-related articles. Hehe. --Efe (talk) 01:12, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

We can nominate it as a good topic. Just copy the template here. Thanks. --Efe (talk) 01:26, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Hope it will be promoted. Thanks for the links. --Efe (talk) 00:15, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Yep. --Efe (talk) 07:06, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

"Don't Panic" and "Shiver" aren't ready yet. --Efe (talk) 01:05, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

More info on both, and more sourcing for "Don't Panic". --Efe (talk) 06:40, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

The FTC is doing well. Hope it will be promoted soon. --Efe (talk) 08:02, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Promoted. Grats! --Efe (talk) 11:26, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

October Baseball WP Newsletter

The Baseball WikiProject Newsletter Issue III – October 2008

"If a woman has to choose between catching a fly ball and saving a baby's life... she'll save the baby without even considering how many men are on base!" — Stephen King (The Dark Tower) News and announcements The Baseball Project promoted 13 lists to Featured status in August and 8 more in September. Amazing job! A combined eleven articles were promoted to Good Article status in August and September. Featured content In September, WikiProject Baseball has had the following articles promoted to: Featured Article status: Nashville Sounds Featured List status: List of New York Mets Opening Day starting pitchers, List of Colorado Rockies Opening Day starting pitchers, List of Florida Marlins Opening Day starting pitchers, Nashville Sounds seasons, List of Tampa Bay Rays Opening Day starting pitchers, List of Seattle Mariners Opening Day starting pitchers, List of Boston Red Sox Opening Day starting pitchers, List of Arizona Diamondbacks Opening Day starting pitchers, New York Yankees seasons Good Articles of August and September: All the Way (Eddie Vedder song), Cy Young, Dan Brouthers, Harmon Killebrew, Rickey Henderson, Billy Pierce, Kinston Indians, Three Rivers Stadium, Bill Lange, Calgary Cannons, Hugh Daily, Homer at the Bat This month's newsletter was designed and written by Wizardman, jj137, and Blackngold29. If you would like to contribute to future newsletters, please contact the Baseball WP outreach dept.

News from the diamond The 2008 opening round playoff matchups with be: Boston Red Sox vs. Los Angeles Angels Milwaukee Brewers vs. Philadelphia Phillies Los Angeles Dodgers vs. Chicago Cubs Chicago White Sox vs. Tampa Bay Rays Help to keep the articles of the postseason updated From the Editors We apologize for not sending out our August newsletter, we have tried to cover some events of the month in this issue. The playoffs have started! The Dodgers and Phillies have won their respective Division Series and will face off in the NL Championship Series. Both series in the American League have yet to be finished. Show your support for your favorite teams by keeping up with their season pages!

Shimabara Rebellion

Hi, and thanks for reviewing Shimabara Rebellion! I've gone through the article and made the corrections you suggested; how do you think it looks now? Many thanks, Tadakuni (talk) 15:13, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Featured List contest

Hey ThinkBlue, this is IMatthew (talk · contribs), co-coordinator of the WikiCup; just informing you of the Featured List contest, starting this coming Friday. You may want to check it out; it will keep you busy for the time being before the WikiCup starts around January. Thanks for listening! iMatthew (talk) 21:59, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Passing GANs

Thanks for your help reviewing GANs. This is just a note to say that when you pass a nomination, don't forget to list it on the GA page. This doesn't happen automatically! Geometry guy 09:05, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Hook (film)

The article is ready. Thanks. Wildroot (talk) 17:52, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

The article is ready. Thanks. Wildroot (talk) 16:46, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

All of the comments have been addressed. Wildroot (talk) 22:45, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Sorry to bother you, but I'm not joking. Empire of the Sun is seriously ready for GA. Wildroot (talk) 03:57, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Alright, some other guy fixed the plot. How about now? Wildroot (talk) 16:52, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Demon Murder Trial

Is ready for review, and as far as I have seen in my seraches, there are no free use images or even unfree images to use in the article. Let me know if there is more to do! Judgesurreal777 (talk) 22:35, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

GA backlog elimination drive

Not sure if you knew about Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/GAN backlog elimination drives/Fall 2008, but I thought it might interest you since you are such a prominent GA reviewer. Just add all of your reviews since the beginning of October...if you are interested, of course. :) Nikki311 02:02, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

RFA Thanks

ThinkBlue, I'd like to thank you for voting in my RFA. Thanks also for expressing your trust in me, and I hope that I live up to your expectations. Don't forget, if you have any questions (or bits of advice), please leave a message on my talk page. Thanks again, Spencer^T♦C 02:42, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Metropolitan Preparatory Academy

Hey ThinkBlue, I've added a copyright tag and a fair use rationale to the Predators logo.jpg and Metroprep logo.jpg. I hope I've sourced these correctly now. Can the speedy deletion message now be removed from the caption? Thanks for your help. Metroprep (talk) 16:08, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

No One Knows GA nomination

First off, thanks for reviewing the nomination. I think all of the points you made have been fixed, so hopefully it's good enough for a pass now. Red157 (talk • contribs) 18:31, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

And thanks for passing it. Hopefully I can send some more articles your way. Red157 (talk • contribs) 21:21, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Supreme Court of Indiana

Hello, I have left comments on the ga review page in regards to you review comments. Please respond when you have a chance. Thanks. Charles Edward 18:53, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

You have email.--S_RX 01:03, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Reply.--S_RX 14:46, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

About what?--S_RX 14:48, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Yep.--S_RX 14:51, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

I did.--S_RX 15:09, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Rock music Newsletter for October 2008

The Rock music WikiProject Newsletter Issue 9 - October 2008

"As long as my face is on page one, I don't care what they say about me on page seventeen."- Mick Jagger Project news The project has a total of 106 GAs and 91 Featured Articles and Lists put together. We collaborated on Soul Bomb. Help us select good versions of WP:ROCK articles for inclusion on the Wikipedia 0.7 release! Find out more about Wikipedia 0.7 selection on the project talk page and add your thoughts to the discussion. If you are personally responsible for a Featured or Good Article listed here, please the select a version to include in Wikipedia 0.7 on that page if you haven't already. Page versions must be selected by October 20. The genres in infobox fields have been removed cause of the discussion found here Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music#Time to remove genre section on info box?. You can provide any opinions you may have about this. This month's "Recommended Rock Album" is Soundgarden - Superunknown (1994).

Editors User:Be Black Hole Sun

Be Black Hole Sun (talk · contribs)

Bad Blood

Hey, whats up? Okay, I finished the review last night, I forgot to tell you. I'm sorry it took me so long, I just wasn't in the mood to read a ppv.--WillC 19:09, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Okay, I just thought to tell you. It slipped my mind.--WillC 19:46, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

I try to be. Thanks for the compliment. You are a good person in calling me a good friend.--WillC 19:53, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

lol.--WillC 20:24, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

• Laughing (awkward)--WillC 20:29, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Question: Why haven't you nominated Judgment Day for FA?--WillC 08:44, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

deadwing

i am new to wikipedia editing. i do not fully understand what is going. this is the first time i have found a way to reply to someone.

in any event, this image here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Pt_deadwing.jpg is the cover of the album as i posted the licensing selection. what more do i need? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dankidikarus (talk • contribs) 01:45, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

GAN of Guggenheim Abu Dhabi

You recently reviewed an article I had placed as a GAN, Louvre Abu Dhabi. Your review was much appreciated, and I have yet another for you, if you have the time. The article is Guggenheim Abu Dhabi. I'm hoping to make it part of a Good Topic in the future, as soon as I have got the other articles up to scratch. Your comments would be much appreciated. Jordan ^Contribs 15:32, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

I see you have stated that you have begun the review of the article at the GAN page. However, I see no evidence of this. I dont know if you've started the review and saved your comments on a page with an incorrect page name, or if you have not yet started. Could you please shed some light on this subject for me? Jordan ^Contribs 15:46, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

GA review for Dugway sheep incident

Thanks for the review. That was the 40th article I have brought to GA status, a minor milestone in the improvement of Wikipedia. :-)--IvoShandor (talk) 19:24, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

GA Ugly

I've unlinked the dates on the article "Ugly", I thought I stop by to tell you, since I noticed you do a lot of work (wich is great by the way), and you might not have time to keep an eye on the article.--Music26/11 19:30, 11 October 2008 (UTC)