User talk:Therajeshjoshi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 2012[edit]

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at "User:Therajeshjoshi/The Alumni Portal, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. This is pure advertising, and is not permitted here, even in user space. DGG ( talk ) 23:07, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DGG Have Started Contributing in a genuine way

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Therajeshjoshi, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Sex offender registry have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:18, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Farmguide logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Farmguide logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Farmguide logo.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Farmguide logo.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:58, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on FarmGuide, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Galobtter (pingó mió) 08:53, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Any more copyright violations or use of wikipedia for promotion will likely get you blocked. Galobtter (pingó mió) 08:58, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your addition to Google Analytics has also been removed, as it was copied from elsewhere. What Galobtter says above is right: if you again add to Wikipedia either promotional content or content copied from copyright sources, you can expect to be permanently suspended from editing without any further warning. You are welcome to make useful edits to the project. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:02, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:12, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Therajeshjoshi! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:12, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Custom signature fix needed[edit]

Hi there! You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. Changes to Wikipedia's software have made your current custom signature invalid.

The problem: Your signature contains a syntax error or obsolete HTML tags.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, you can fix your signature, or you can do nothing.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

  1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
  2. Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
  3. Remove anything in the Signature: text box.
  4. Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (Do not click the red "Restore all default settings" button, which will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

  1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
  2. Click the Learn more button next to the error to learn how to fix the error.
  3. Update your signature to fix the error.
  4. Click Save to update to your newly fixed signature.

Solution 3: Do nothing:

  1. In accordance with a recent request for comment, all invalid signatures will be changed to the default, which looks like "Example (talk)", one month from now.

If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Star Mississippi was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Star Mississippi 14:23, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Star Mississippi,
Thank you reviewing content added and dropping suggestion,
I would humbly request to review below highly authenticated sources like OTT Platforms and TV Channels like Hungama TV, MX Player, ZeeTv, Airtel Stream etc. apart from IMBD and Social Media Profile. All this below mentioned reference I have added in the draft article as well.
Please review atleast once them.
1. https://www.hungama.com/tv-show/swaanng/83556895/
2. https://www.hungama.com/tv-show/swaanng/season-1/83556895/episode/out-of-focus/83556901/
3. https://www.mxplayer.in/show/watch-the-red-land/season-1/the-land-mafia-online-874272126d86d1332471987807064bcd
4. https://web.archive.org/web/20110613235729/http://www.zeetv.com/shows/bhagonwali-baante-apni-taqdeer/cast.html
5.https://www.airtelxstream.in/tv-shows/swaanng/HUNGAMA_TVSHOW_83556895
Also, I would like to clarify that I have not been paid for this creation. Thank You. Rajesh 14:31, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aviram7 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 16:19, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Aviram, Thanks for posting your opinion,
I would like you to go through the below articles as a reference about notability about Swami Shri Adgadanand Ji Maharaj, Where Prime minister as well home ministers had a interaction on this topic matter. The articles are in Hindi Language.
1. https://www.jagran.com/haryana/faridabad-12380242.html
2. https://www.bhaskar.com/local/uttar-pradesh/news/pm-narendra-modi-speak-to-swami-adgadanand-maharaj-about-health-condition-in-varanasi-uttar-pradesh-today-news-and-updates-127685081.html
Hope this counts as a notability. Rajesh 06:22, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Swami Shri Adgadanand Ji Maharaj has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Swami Shri Adgadanand Ji Maharaj. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 09:38, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Avdhesh Kushwaha (February 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:33, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Information icon Hello, Therajeshjoshi. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Avdhesh Kushwaha, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:34, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DoubleGrazing,
I have read your above comment on my recent contribution, I will like to thank on the guidance about Wikipedia's Policy.
Also, I would like to clarify again as it may seems to you (editors) that It is a Conflict Of Interest or may be a paid, merely just because I created in-depth content for the recent draft (Avdhesh Kushvaha) which includes Imdb and other reference links as well but I feel you (editors) overlooked other reference links (which I felt little disappointed) and only considered IMDB citing it is not valid as per wikipedia's policy. I truly respect this things.
The only reason for multiple followups is because I collected much information ownself but all were not considered. I giveup now.
Just want to assure, I would be creating more contributions which I feel comes under notable person (like another draft Swami Adgadanand).
Thanks. TheRajeshJoshi(talk) 11:08, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sundeep Sharma, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fram (talk) 08:36, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Jeromeenriquez were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Jeromeenriquez (talk) 18:53, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]