User talk:TheWeekdayz

Your submission at Articles for creation: JaackMaate (July 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ProClasher97 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

YouTube, Twitter, and DailyMail are not reliable sources. These three sites comprise most of the references in this article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:JaackMaate and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:JaackMaate, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 23:11, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheWeekdayz! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 23:11, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: JaackMaate (July 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Clearfrienda was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: The article has been declined numerous times, and has clearly not shown notability with its 3 deletions, no point declining again for the issues to not be resolved. The topic is clearly not notable.

Clear friend a ^💬 11:39, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t know why you’re putting this on my talk page. I’ve already had talks with another admin who told me to expand the early life section and add references. Then it’ll be accepted. TheWeekdayz (talk) 13:12, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm C.Fred. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to User talk:RossButsy have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. The only harassment I saw in your interaction with that user was a message you left; I don't see anything they did. —C.Fred (talk) 12:09, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Bottomlivefan95 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bottomlivefan95. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ST47 (talk) 20:53, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Logitech G923[edit]

Hello, TheWeekdayz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Logitech G923, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Logitech G923[edit]

Hello, TheWeekdayz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Logitech G923".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:42, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]