User talk:ThatSpiderByte

February 2022[edit]

Hello, ThatSpiderByte, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

ThatSpiderByte, good luck, and have fun. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:27, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nesticus cellulanus has been accepted[edit]

Nesticus cellulanus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gpkp [u • t • c] 06:25, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, ThatSpiderByte, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Ganesha811 (talk) 14:27, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nesticus cellulanus[edit]

Kudos for a well written article! I wanted to inform you that I have nominated a fact from the article to appear on Wikipedia's main page in the Did you know section. You can find the nomination here. Please feel free to nominate alternate hooks/facts if you like. Ciridae (talk) 09:00, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

wow, thank you! ThatSpiderByte (talk) 09:19, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Nesticus cellulanus[edit]

On 15 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nesticus cellulanus, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the colour of the markings on Nesticus cellulanus can vary depending on the light level of the habitat, with darker habitats causing lighter markings? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nesticus cellulanus. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Nesticus cellulanus), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:06, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reference quotes[edit]

Is there any reason in particular that your references are all in quotes? Per WP:repeatedcitations, quotes are only required if you have spaces in the name. For instance <ref name="Simon, 1895"> needs quotes, but <ref name=Simo1895> doesn't. I picked my particular style (first 4 author/4 year digits) to shorten refs and avoid quotes because I think they look ugly [personal preference], but it looks like you're doing both the shortened version and the quotes. I'm just stopping by to make sure you know the quotes are only needed if the refname has any spaces in it ~~and bc I think quotes are ugly..~~. Anyway, thanks for all the work you've done so far, Cheers! Sesame honey tart 11:55, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thanks for letting me know! There's no reason besides inexperience, I'll be sure to only use them when necessary in future. ThatSpiderByte (talk) 22:23, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There's no policy or guideline regarding the use of quotes in for named references. (Unless something's change and my info is outdated.) Sesamehoneytart is correct to write that the quotes are only needed if there is a space in the name of a named reference but it's not wrong to use quotes when there are no spaces; so if you make edits only to remove the quotes, you may end up clashing with somebody who prefers them. That said, I agree that the unnecessary quotes are ugly and make reading the source harder. I copyedit a lot of references and I tend to remove unnecessary quotes if doing a bunch of other cleanup but it's kind of a gray area. This is usually fine if the article was in an inconsistent state regarding the quotes, but if you come across somebody who really prefers them and the article was initially always using quotes, it may be an issue. Jason Quinn (talk) 01:08, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Avoiding redirects should usually not be done[edit]

Hi, ThatSpiderByte. Cool name! I too was editing spider articles and I noticed this edit where you avoided a redirect. Please see WP:DONOTFIXIT. This type of edit should not usually be done for various reasons explained at the linik. That said, there are exceptions to every rule, so there's also WP:DOFIXIT, but in those cases you should be very clear why you are avoiding the redirect in the edit summary. Since this change doesn't seem to qualify as an exceptional case, I'd thought I'd give you a heads up on this redirect guideline that trips up almost everybody at some point, especially intermediate experience editors. Jason Quinn (talk) 00:38, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah thanks for letting me know, I'll keep that in mind in future! - ThatSpiderByte (talk) 06:43, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022[edit]

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Rlin8 (☎·✎·📧) 21:31, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah thanks, I've been trying to use them more often but it's still not a habit. I appreciate the pointer! - ThatSpiderByte (talk) 21:40, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Board of Trustees election[edit]

Thank you for supporting the NPP initiative to improve WMF support of the Page Curation tools. Another way you can help is by voting in the Board of Trustees election. The next Board composition might be giving attention to software development. The election closes on 6 September at 23:59 UTC. View candidate statement videos and Vote Here. MB 04:18, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Velvet Spider Eye Diagram[edit]

Hello, I ask for your help to make an eye diagram for the Velvet spider family, as it's a pretty esscential way to identify them. And as of yet I do not have the technical skills to understand how it works. Oh, and by the way thanks for the barnstarn. Thanks, User:MaskedLynx 🕷️ 02:23, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've got some free time today so I'll start working on it ^-^ - ThatSpiderByte 🕷️ 11:24, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've finished the first one for the genus Adonea, gonna work on a few other genera in the family, but I just wanted to double check that one's accurate? - ThatSpiderByte 🕷️ 16:46, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it seems to be. Thanks, User:MaskedLynx 🕷️ 17:08, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Though the entire family has similar eye formatting, I mainly wanted it to add to the family page. Thanks a lot User:MaskedLynx 🕷️ 17:12, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]