User talk:SunDawn/Archives/2023/August

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Signpost: 1 August 2023

Gorani

Hi SunDown I you did make a mistake! Gorani are an ethnic croat group! Because they are bosniaks and bosniaks are Croats of muslim faith!

Now this seems a little bit nationalistik but I have reasons! Long story short there was never a bosniak tribe which settled the balkans with the Croats and serbs! And there are many more arguments over that!

Not to mention that he closest related ethnic group to the bosniaks are the Croats

But I have other arguments! Anyways thank you for notifying me about the change! As we concluded the Bosniaks are muslim Croats! And there is so much proof that tie the Gorani to these Croats! I would like the change back the page in the way I corrected it

If you don’t agree that is completely fine! I respect everyones opinion but this is my opinions

Again thanks for notifying me have a great day 78.0.55.150 (talk) 16:35, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Mistake in Wyomissing high school page

I apologize, it was an accidental copy-paste without adding the rest of the information. AlsoPterodactyl (talk) 16:18, 4 August 2023 (UTC)Reply I understand why you reverted the student demographics section, but did you also mean to revert my edits on the History section? Thanks! AlsoPterodactyl (talk) 16:21, 4 August 2023 (UTC AlsoPterodactyl (talk) 21:15, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Brit Awards 1996

You incorrectly reverted my edit on the page. I corrected the wrong quote, which was misquoted by the article and provided a first-hand source for the correct quote, the actual video recording of the words being said. Please don't do that in the future. --Luchador619 (talk) 06:56, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Hello Luchador619, the references given clearly stated "Hasbeens shouldn't give awards to gonnabes." If the source is incorrect, you must provide alternative references that said otherwise. Wikipedia is about verifiability, and your preferred version can't be verified by the current reference per WP:RS. The actual video recording can't be seen as reference, as editors watching the video and taking the quote from such video is WP:OR.
As it stands, the stable version should stand - you are welcome to provide different reference that quote your preferred version. I will revert to the stable version. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:14, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Punjab University Law College

Hi! I've improved the page "Punjab University Law College" by adding infobox and some history. I'll improve it more by adding detailed history and current standing after my research. So will the page still be deleted or the warning message will be removed on its own? Thanks Dawood Ch 471 (talk) 08:45, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

It looks like the article will be Kept. The page won't be deleted and the warning message will be removed on its own. Have a good day! ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 17:12, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2022 United States infant formula shortage you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 06:03, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for taking up the article for GA review. Hopefully I can work it out with you. I would have to admit that the timing caught me in a bit of pickle, as these weeks I would be particularly busy for work, but I will try my best. Again, thank you! ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:42, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – August 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2023).

Administrator changes

added Firefangledfeathers
removed

Interface administrator changes

added Novem Linguae

Technical news

Arbitration


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:54, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Review of Prussia-U.S. relations article

Hello, SunDawn, just wanted to check in in case you haven't had time to review my recent article creation as you have done so in the past. The article was moved out of my user space back in July. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:05, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi! I saw that you marked Euskirchener Kreisbahnen as reviewed, but it currently has no inline citations. I don't think it complies with WP:V, and it may have been more appropriate to WP:DRAFTIFY or at least tag it for sourcing issues. I wouldn't consider that article ready for mainspace. I've discussed this with the creator User_talk:Kelisi#Euskirchener_Kreisbahnen. Let me know what you think. Happy editing! :) Actualcpscm (talk) 14:01, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

I do agree that it lacked inline citations, and I have tagged it as such. From my point of view, this article is still good enough due to WP:NEXIST. It also didn't look like a hoax or lies, the main difficulty is finding the pages of the book. But the safer position is to WP:DRAFTIFY it, and I have no objection to draftification. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:11, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for the feedback! I agree that (lack of) notability is probably not a major concern here. Have a good day. Actualcpscm (talk) 14:14, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
The railway was part of the Euskirchen district's industrial history; so of course it's notable. Well, ladies and gentlemen, we have a problem: I have discovered that the German article's creator, Nordgau (I was mistaken earlier about it being Radiojunkie), died on 14 October 2021 (it says so on his userpage on de:WP); so I will have to figure out what to do over on de:WP to see whether anybody there can furnish inline citations for the original German article. Any chance of having them in the English article is contingent on that, as the sources are actual printed books published in Germany.Kelisi (talk) 15:10, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
That's really sad, rest in peace :(
Regarding the books, it might be worth checking at WP:RX if someone has access to these books in some (searchable) digital archive. Actualcpscm (talk) 15:20, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Wanted to know if you plan on making any changes to this article? I don't want to start a full review until the sourcing and missing context issues are fixed. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 19:16, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 August 2023

A tag has been placed on Category:Shipwrecks of Sudan indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 02:45, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

The article 2022 United States infant formula shortage you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:2022 United States infant formula shortage for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 17:01, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Requesting your review

Hi Sundawn,

I got a few more articles stuck in NPP queue. If you have any time, would you mind taking a look? Thanks

- Imcdc Contact 02:20, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 August 2023