User talk:Sullivan9211

Welcome!

Hello, Sullivan9211, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ←Humus sapiens ^ну? 00:46, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eras[edit]

Please don't replace era notation like you did in [1] and [2]. See WP:MOSDATE#Eras. ←Humus sapiens ^ну? 01:52, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Same rule, different article [3]. — Kralizec! (talk) 02:31, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that BP (before present) and BC (before Christ) are NOT equivalent, as you did here on Wales article: [4] --76.201.142.180 (talk) 08:18, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your fourth warning. Do not replace era notation as you did on Agora (film). Viriditas (talk) 02:13, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009[edit]

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to History of National Football League Championship. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Aka042 (talk) 13:50, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to History of National Football League Championship constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. Aka042 (talk) 13:52, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aka042 I deleted that section of the page concerning the History of the National Football League Championship because that particular section was a duplicate of a previous section earlier in the page. At least that is how it looked when I logged on. I didn't mean to cause any problems. Just look at the page and see if that section that I deleted was duplicated on the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.115.232.65 (talk) 14:16, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dynasty (sports)[edit]

Thank you for your recent edits to this article. However, for purposes of this article, it's not enough to give a citation showing records and championships. In order not to run afoul of Wikipedia's rules against synthesis and original research, we need to have a reliable source stating that it is a dynasty. Thanks, cmadler (talk) 15:06, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that source, I've added in all the other dynasties mentioned there. cmadler (talk) 17:06, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Minnesota Vikings[edit]

I don't really care which way it's listed...but the page is on my watchlist and it's getting kind of old watching the slow-motion edit war over championships in the infobox. Is there a discussion somewhere that discusses the way that this is supposed to be presented? It doesn't appear that discuss your edits much, having only a pair of talk page comments and no edit summaries that I can see. You might find your edit reverted less frequently if you explained why you continue to make it. --Onorem ♠Dil 14:50, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SEC football standing templates[edit]

Sullivan, I have noticed your work on these templates. If you can knock them out for each year in complete decades (e.g. 1980–1989), I will gladly add them to the Florida Gators football season-decade pages (e.g., "Florida Gators football, 1980–1989"). Thanks, and keep up the good work. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 19:33, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:1976 Southeastern football standings[edit]

Template:1976 Southeastern football standings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jweiss11 (talk) 18:20, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ERA violations, again[edit]

Per WP:ERA, where it says "Do not change from one style to another unless there is substantial reason for the change, and consensus for the change with other editors", do not change date styles as you did here on the Louisiana article. Since the last time you were warned for this, in 2009 and 2010 multiple times over multiple articles, this policy ab out arbitrarily changing from one date style to another has not changed.

You also did this in May 2012 here [5], you removed the CE style from an article in March 2012 here, and changed style here in November of 2011. You are a serial violator of this policy. Please do not repeat this WP:DISRUPTIVE policy violating behavior again or I will take this matter to WP:ANI to have admins deal with this issue. Thank you and have a nice day. He iro 18:19, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Heiro has a problem with neutrality. Heiro is not confortable with any notions with leanings to other religions than Heiro's own. If one article should have just one date system, why Heiro have deleted all edits wich unified all dates to majority in that article in the case of BC/AD, but let all the edits with BCE and BC to stay? Sorry, but Heiro has a double standard... and a big problem to climb over in the field of scientific thinking. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.157.92.31 (talk) 12:07, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Burgess Jenkins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Broken (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:16, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Florida's 5th congressional district, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alicia Martinez. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Moon Griffon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lafayette. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Sullivan9211. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Sullivan9211. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summaries[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! UW Dawgs (talk) 01:00, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. UW Dawgs (talk) 01:01, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. UW Dawgs (talk) 10:02, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

UW Dawgs Here is a letter I received from the Director of Athletic Communications at the University of Washington. Hi Sully,

The answer, unfortunately, is that there is no "definitive answer."

The list in the media guide is of polls or organizations that declared Washington as "National Champion" for those years. We neither claim nor "don't claim" those. They just are facts. We "claim" the two that are up in the stadium, but it's up to any individual to decide what counts, since there is no NCAA Division I-A (or Division I-FBS) champion. Even in the era of the College Football Playoff, the winner of the tournament isn't an NCAA champion. Best wishes, Jeff

-- Jeff Bechthold Director of Athletic Communications University of Washington c: 206-473-8657 t: @jeffbechthold [email protected]

GO PURPLE. BE GOLD.

December 16 2017[edit]

Thank you for your edits during this year for the Washington Huskies football page. However, you have been making substantial changes to the "Championships" season without providing convincing reasons.

I have noticed you made almost identical but significant changes such as removing several subsections created by early editors during August, October, and December. Again, none of these changes came with clear, convincing reasons or notes. Your edits also led to several mistakes on the page, such as confusing "Division Champions" with "Conference Champions." If you wish to remove "Division Champions" subsection (actually most other pages about college football teams have this subsection), please provide reasons and do not enter "Conference Champions" information under the "Division Champions" tab. Unfortunately, to maintain quality and consistency of the page, several other editors had to revert your changes more than once. Due to reasons above, one of the users who undid your changes marked your edits as "page/content blanking." Per Wikipedia:Disruptive editing protocols, someone may request an administrator via Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents (ANI) if regular page editors reach consensus on reverting your edits. Please provide your convincing reasons for such edits so we will consider accepting your changes. Thanks so much and happy editing. J1n9 (talk) 02:01, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. UW Dawgs (talk) 00:36, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

UW Dawgs (talk

Here is a letter I received from the Director of Athletic Communications at the University of Washington. Hi Sully,

The answer, unfortunately, is that there is no "definitive answer."

The list in the media guide is of polls or organizations that declared Washington as "National Champion" for those years. We neither claim nor "don't claim" those. They just are facts. We "claim" the two that are up in the stadium, but it's up to any individual to decide what counts, since there is no NCAA Division I-A (or Division I-FBS) champion. Even in the era of the College Football Playoff, the winner of the tournament isn't an NCAA champion. Best wishes, Jeff

-- Jeff Bechthold Director of Athletic Communications University of Washington c: 206-473-8657 t: @jeffbechthold [email protected]

GO PURPLE. BE GOLD.

Please read WP:DE, the activity in which you appear to be engaged. Then please read WP:NOR, which addresses the above. Finally, College football national championships in NCAA Division I FBS is a good article to familiarize yourself with the complexity. UW Dawgs (talk) 01:18, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm a writer at Sports Illustrated hoping to get in touch with you for a story on the UCF football team. Could you find me on Twitter at @stephapstein? (I'm new to this so not sure I want to post my email address on what appears to be an open page, but happy to DM it to you so we can proceed.) Thank you! Stephaniesi (talk) 16:21, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mercedes-Benz Superdome, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mercedes-Benz Arena (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Knute Rockne, you may be blocked from editing.

You may wish to read WP:TBAN as relates to your ongoing inability to accurately edit CFB national championship content. UW Dawgs (talk) 00:03, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So I guess when I source my material from the University of Notre Dame's own website, it is wrong. Only YOU can decide if the material is accurate. (talk)

There was no sourcing offered in either[6] [7] of your WP:DE edits. UW Dawgs (talk) 00:11, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I added a source this time.

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:La-fg-wn-germany-gestapo-chief-mueller-death-2-001.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:La-fg-wn-germany-gestapo-chief-mueller-death-2-001.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 07:01, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. UW Dawgs (talk) 20:16, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Missouri Tigers football. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Drmies (talk) 23:57, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Purdue Boilermakers football. Specifically, you recently removed[8] Purdue's 1931 Parke Davis national championship without using an WP:edit summary. Please do not inaccurately remove national championship content. That content has been restored with supporting citations.[9] UW Dawgs (talk) 21:58, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Maryland Terrapins football navbox. Specifically, you again removed accurate college football national championship content, this time from Maryland.[10] The Maryland Terrapins football article now shows citations for multiple selectors awarding Maryland a 1951 national championship. This edit was also done without an WP:edit summary. Please stop your ongoing vandalism of college football national championship content, instead use Talk pages to discuss if you are confused. UW Dawgs (talk) 21:58, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

National championship content in multiple articles/template[edit]

Please be aware that college football national content exists in at least four locations for a given team-year selection.

The team article (Ex, Purdue Boilermakers football#National championships + infobox)
The team YYYY articles (Ex, 1931 Purdue Boilermakers football team)
The team's template (Ex, Template:Purdue Boilermakers football navbox)
The topic's list article (College football national championships in NCAA Division I FBS)

By inconsistently editing one location and not the others, you are creating cleanup work for other editors to reconcile. If you are confused, please ask -this explicitly does not imply that you need permission to edit, it is only a callout that others are willing to assist you and you historically do not engage on article Talk pages. Additionally, it is significantly easier to state and cite "XYZ university claims the 19xx national championship," rather than "XYZ does not claim the national championship." You'll be much more successful citing something that can be observed and affirmed, rather than the reverse. UW Dawgs (talk) 22:12, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Sullivan9211. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. UW Dawgs (talk) 15:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]