User talk:Someone's Moving Castle

Someone's Moving Castle, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Hi Someone's Moving Castle! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

http:// to https:// changes?[edit]

Any reason why you're changing all links from http:// to https:// ? Andy Dingley (talk) 10:26, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted you April edits to GeoHack. Understand that not everyone wants slow HTTPS since it avoids network caches. — Dispenser 22:35, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm with these guys. Any specific reason for this? These https changes are interpreted as possible vandalism by STiki and I don't know what to make of it. Seems unnecessary if anything. — MusikAnimal ^talk 20:37, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm RA0808. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Japan Airlines, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, RA0808 ^talk _contribs 17:07, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Japan Airlines with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 17:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OER inquiry[edit]

Hi Someone's Moving Castle, I'm sending you this message because you're one of about 300 users who have recently edited an article in the umbrella category of open educational resources (OER) (or open education). In evaluating several projects we've been working on (e.g. the WIKISOO course and WikiProject Open), my colleague Pete Forsyth and I have wondered who chooses to edit OER-related articles and why. Regardless of whether you've taken the WIKISOO course yourself - and/or never even heard the term OER before - we'd be extremely grateful for your participation in this brief, anonymous survey before 27 April. No personal data is being collected. If you have any ideas or questions, please get in touch. My talk page awaits. Thanks for your support! - Sara FB (talk) 20:49, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]